Preview

Attempt to commit murder

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
416 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Attempt to commit murder
Attempt To Commit Murder
Doris McCants
American InterContinental University

Introduction
I’ve been asked by Attorney Cheatham to do some research concerning the case for Mr. G. Ilty Assin, who has been charged with attempt to commit murder in the first degree. He is pleading to be innocent and therefore he has hired our firm to represent him in his case.

Memo
To Attorney Cheatham
Concerning: Mr. Assin
Explain the elements of murder including what is required to convict someone of attempt to commit murder.
The elements of murder are, the intention to kill, recklessness causing death, the intention of inflicting grievous bodily harm. The requirement of convicting someone of attempt to commit murder the People must prove that the defendant took at least one direct but ineffective step toward killing another person. A direct step is one that goes beyond planning or preparation and shows that a person is putting his or her plan into action.
Explain whether or not Mr. Assin committed attempt to commit the murder of Sally’s husband.
I don’t believe Mr. Assin committed attempt to commit the murder of Ms. Sally’s husband, he did not make a direct step that goes beyond planning or preparation to putting a plan in action.

Explain why or why he has not committed the crime.
The evidence against Mr. Assin does not look good, however in order to commit a crime one has to plan and make preparation and put the plan into action and he has not done this. Ms. Sally has put the plan into action she made preparation but in the midst of making her plans she met the wrong person at the restaurant, she believed she was dealing the person she had asked to kill her husband which was an undercover officer. Mr. Assin happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time, he thought the lady was coming on to him and so he followed along with her. He even ordered the same drink and wink back at her, but never once did he talk

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    People V. Goetz Summary

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree: a person is guilty if they possess any firearm. Attempted murder: a person is guilty if the crime attempted is murder in the first degree (Section 35.15). Assault: a person is guilty of assault in the first degree when with intent to cause serious physical injury to another person, he causes such injury to such person or to a third person by means of a deadly weapon or a dangerous instrument (Section…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sandra Petrocelli is the prosecuting lawyer and is good. She is pushing for the death penalty. She states that everyone involved in the crime is equally guilty including the one who wrestled for the gun, the robber and the two lookouts. She is trying to prove that Steve knew and associated with the two robbers who are bad characters. He was a lookout for them. Two men, James King and "Bobo" Evans entered a drugstore. They were to rob the owner, Mr. Nesbitt. Little did they know Mr. Nesbitt had a licensed gun. There was a struggle and Mr. Nesbitt was shot dead. There was a woman in the store at the time of the crime and…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    They could try and state that she did not poison Mr. Navidad because she was not the only one that had the opportunity. We used her surveillance footage times being off as a point of her lying. They could say she just forgot the exact times. They could say she was just in the wrong place at the wrong time. Her fingerprints were not at the crime scene. Ms. Brown’s hair was found there o why not accuse her of the murder. Even though the defense team might have had some arguments I can fight back and respond to all of them. We did a forensic test to prove that only Mrs. Mulroy could have poisoned him because she was the only one that had the opportunity to have put the poison in the cola. The test came back negative on the ice cubes so that ruled out Ms. Brown. Yes she could have forgotten but she left out major points in her interrogation trying to throw us off. She had a motive to kill him. She did have a meeting with him to give her an opportunity to kill him like she had planned. We did not run a DNA test to prove that any kind of hair material or DNA found. That is her office so of course her hair is in her…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Therefore, it is the job of the prosecution to then establish whether she also has the mens rea for her Victims’ murder. The mens rea for murder is the intention to kill or cause grievous bodily harm. There are two types of intention: direct intention and oblique intention. Direct intention as defined by James LJ in Mohan6 is the “decision” to bring about a “particular consequence” no matter whether the Defendant “desired that consequence or not”. In the words of R.A. Duff7 direct intent can be construed from the Defendant’s actions if the Defendant would consider himself a “failure” if the “relevant consequence” did not occur. Lydia stated that she had no “malice” whatsoever to Danielle or Gemma and only intended to scare Jasmine. By applying Mohan8 it is clear that Lydia did not make the decision to throw the law reports in order to kill Danielle and would not consider herself to have failed if her actions did not cause the death of Danielle. Therefore, Lydia did not display direct intent to kill Danielle and whether or not Lydia displayed oblique intent must be explored. The cases of R v Maloney9 and Hancock and Shankland10 provided some confusion on what degree of foresight was required for a jury to infer intention from a Defendant’s actions. In Nedrick11 it was established that the jury should ask how “probable” the consequences from the Defendant’s voluntary act were and if…

    • 1906 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jack, Bert and Pratt

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the case, the court dismissed the charge of the attempt of murder of Bert because Jack could not have killed Bert due to the malfunction of his gun. The court was not right by dismissing the attempt murder charge because he had the intent to kill Bert and he even fired his weapon towards him but ended up killing Pratt. All the tree elements of an attempt were present plus it also meets the mens rea of attempt. It meets the mens rea because Jack intentionally performed an act that was proximate to the completion of a crime, and by possessing the intent or purpose to achieve a criminal objective. In addition meets the actus reus of attempt because he came extremely close to the commission of the crime. In addition he killed Pratt while pointing the gun at Bert with the intent to kill him.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    If in fact Mr. Assign did make a direct step and then for whatever reason decided against the murder, then Mr. Assin is still considered guilty of the said crime. Millman, et.al, (1999)…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sentencing Proposal FINAL

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages

    My team and I believe there was a crime committed and at some point the defendant was in the victims home and stole some of her property. There was a fight or struggle of some sort because the victim has the defendants skin under her fingernails. Drugs were found in both party’s apartments, blood stained the carpet and rope was discovered in the victims’ apartment, which was used to tie the victim up at some point. In the defendants home a journal was discovered with strange journal entries talking about God’s work and purchasing rope, rags and a hunting knife to fulfill his destiny. 300 photos were hung all over the wall and the defendant was talking about being God and about aliens. If you want to charge the defendant with murder you need physical proof my client murdered the victim. Yes, we realize the evidence may point to the defendant committing the crime and maybe he did kill Miss Opee but at this time we do not know for certain. Even though we have all this evidence against Mr. Dents, the only real solid evidence you have is the skin under the fingernails. We do not know if that came from a struggle, a fight, she could have slapped him for some reason or it could have even been from a consensual sexual encounter between the two of them. You did not find a murder weapon, so it will be a tough case to prove he murdered her. In our opinion I believe he should have a psych evaluation administered to even determine if he is able to stand trial based on his mental status. Pending the results the defendant should either be released on bail until the trial or if he is found to be not in a state of mind to stand trial, he should be sent to a hospital to get the mental help he needs. Once he is released from the mental hospital, and there is evidence that his health has improved and he is able to stand trial, at that moment we can put him in front of a jury of his peers,…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Prepare a paper analyzing why, under certain circumstances, two state trials in two different states for the murder of the same person will not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Also, analyze why, under certain circumstances, a state trial and a federal trial may be held for the murder of the same person without violating the Double Jeopardy Clause of the U.S. Constitution. As part of this assignment, you should conduct legal research to support your analysis of the concept of Double Jeopardy.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Regina Knight Case

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In order for a trial to be brought, the police and prosecutors might be able to prove that the elements of the particular offence are present. In this criminal case both Actus reus, Mens rea as well causation was clearly shown through the behavior of Katherine Knight.…

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    anita cobby case

    • 1873 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Recently, an interesting case of murder involving a young married woman was unravelled by the crime scene team. The collection of evidence and laboratory examination of exhibits provided the corroborative evidence necessary to prove the victim’s in-laws were trying to mislead the Investigating Officer by fabricating a story of looting and murder…

    • 1873 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    (1) that the murder was committed while the offender was engaged in the commission of other capital felonies, ... (2) that he committed the murder for the purpose of receiving the victim's' money and automobile; or (3) that the murder was “outrageously and wantonly vile, horrible and inhuman” in that it “involved the depravity of [the] mind of the defendant. ...” (“Gregg V. Georgia. 428 U.S.153” Justia.org 153)…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Agg vs Mit Circumstances

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The first of these factors is called aggravating factors which means factors that permit enhancement of an offender’s punishment, including an offender’s prior record, nature of the offense and identity of the victim(s). States use this term when dealing with Capitol murder or First degree murder, these factors are used by attorneys in their argument to get a guilty verdict and the punishment of the Death Penalty rather than life in prison without the possibility of Parole. Basically these factors are used to persuade the jury to vote death. Some aggravating factors are: killing following a rape, or, sexual…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Involuntary Manslaughter

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Manslaughter seems to be the most flexible and elusive type of homicide as far as the court system goes. The law has gradually made successful differentiations and weeding out about how it recognizes murder on the one hand, based mainly, though not exclusively, on an intention to kill. Manslaughter on the other hand, based mainly, though not exclusively, on the absence of intention to kill.…

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Felony Murder Rule

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Examine the felony murder rule: discuss some of the problems associated with it. What problems do you think were involved in the case of Brandon Hein?…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many different legal categories of homicide. Two of these categories are; first degree murder and second degree murder. If the person acted with ‘malice aforethought’ or, planned to kill another individual and proceeded to carry out the act, then it is considered first degree murder. Shooting or stabbing someone in the heart, would be considered first degree murder, as the offender deliberately acted with malice aforethought, and therefore intended to kill the victim. Second degree murder is a homicide in which, the person did not intend to kill the victim, but still wanted to hurt…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics