Preview

Capital Asset Pricing Model vs Dividend Growth Model

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
535 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Capital Asset Pricing Model vs Dividend Growth Model
The dividend growth model approach limited application in practice because of its two assumptions.
It assumes that the dividend per share will grow at a constant rate, g, forever
The expected dividend growth rate, g, should be less than the cost of equity, Ke, to arrive at the simple growth formula.

The growth formula is,

Ke = (DIV1 / Po) + g

These assumptions imply that the dividend growth approach cannot be applied to those companies, which are not paying any dividends, or whose dividend per share is growing at a rate higher than Ke, or whose dividend policies are highly volatile. The dividend growth model approach also fails to deal with risk directly. In contrast, the CAPM has a wider application although it is based on restrictive assumptions. The only condition for its use is that the company’s share is quoted on the stock exchange. Also, all variables in the CAPM are market determined and expect the company specific share price data; they are common to all companies. The value of beta is determined in an objective manner by using sound statistical method. One practical problem with the use of beta, however, is that it does not probably remain stable over time.

The Capital asset pricing model (CAPM) provides an alternative approach for the calculation of the cost of equity. As per the CAPM, the required rate of return on equity is given is given by the following relationship:

Ke = Rf + (Rm – Rf) Bi

Above equation requires the following three parameters to estimate a firm’s cost of equity:
The risk free rate (Rf).
The market risk premium (Rm – Rf).
The beta of the firm’s share.

(1). the risk free rate

The yields on the government treasury securities are used as the risk-free rate. You can use returns either on the short term or the long term treasury securities. It is a common practice to use the return on the short term treasury bills as the risk free rate. Since investments are long term decisions, many analysts prefer to use

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Finc2011 Major Assignment

    • 1909 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The approach used to estimate the growth rate (g) for dividend payments of Woolworths is:…

    • 1909 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Telus: the Cost of Capital

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In calculating the cost of equity, we will use the average between the dividend growth model and the CAPM. Since R-squared = 0.13 we know that the correlation is not strong enough and the sole use of the beta given to us will prove unreliable. For this reason, we choose to take the average between the dividend growth model and the CAPM model if possible. Also, as described above, we decide not to count the underwriter fees in our calculation.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    5. The constant growth model (or “dividend discount model”) of stock valuation is based upon the premise that…

    • 2381 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Walmart Finacial Analysis

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The constant growth DDM stated that the current value of a firm’s stock price was equal to next year’s expected dividend divided by the investor’s required rate of return minus the expected dividend growth rate. And the required return could be decomposed into two parts: the expected dividend plus the expected future growth in dividends. That is the stock price equals dividend divided by the indicated dividend yield.…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Joanna then proceeded to calculate Nike’s costs of debt and equity. She found Nike’s cost of debt by dividing total interest expense, which was found on the income statement, by her previous calculation for debt. Nike’s total interest expense was $58.7 million, so their cost of debt was found to be 4.3%. Joanna used a tax rate of 38% in her calculations, making Nike’s cost of debt after tax to be 2.7%. Joanna decided to use the CAPM model in her calculation of Nike’s cost of equity. She used the risk-free rate of 5.74% on a 20-year Treasury bond, the geometric mean for market risk premium from 1929 to 1999 which was 5.9%, and Nike’s average beta from 1996 to 2001, which was 0.80 to make her calculations. Using these values, she obtained a cost of equity of 10.5%. Joanna then took the weights and costs of debt and equity that she found and calculated Nike’s WACC to be 8.4%.…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Chapter 7

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1. Which of the following statements is CORRECT?a. The constant growth model takes into consideration the capitalgains investors expect to earn on a stock.STATEMENT A is true because the expected growth rate is also the expected capitalgains yield.b. Two firms with the same expected dividend and growth rates must alsohave the same stockprice.c. It is appropriate to use the constant growth model to estimate a stock 'svalue even if itsgrowth rate is never expected to become constant.d. If a stock has a required rate of return rs = 12%, and if its dividend isexpected to grow at aconstant rate of 5%, this implies that the stock’s dividend yield is also 5%.e. The price of a stock is the present value of all expected future dividends,discounted at thedividend growth rate.2. Stocks A and B have the following data. Assuming the stock market is efficientand the stocks are in equilibrium, which of the following statements is CORRECT?A B…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    a. Find the Expected Rate of Return on the Market Portfolio given that the Expected Rate of Return on Asset "i" is 12%, the Risk-Free Rate is 4%, and the Beta (b) for Asset "i" is 1.2.…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    505 Quiz 1

    • 852 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Miller, M. and Modigiliani, F. (1961), Dividend policy, growth, and the valuation of shares. Journal of Business, 34, 411-433…

    • 852 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    T 7. The required rate of return includes the risk‑free rate and a risk premium.…

    • 1598 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nike Cost of Capital

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This report points out flaws of Cohen’s assumption and recalculates the WACC to obtain the most accurate cost of capital. In the cost of equity calculation, we will use CAPM, the dividend discount model (DDM), and the earnings capitalization model (ECM) to see the different in each and suggest the most suitable one.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Owner's Equity

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Investors often use the dividend per share as a measure to determine the real value of a share. Proponents of this school of thought argue that the earning per share is of no real value to anyone but those who can determine the policies of a company. The income of an investor is the dividend that he receives. It is therefore submitted that the value of a share should be a multiple of the dividend paid on that share. (Petroff)…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    We use current yield of 10-year U.S. government bond as risk-free rate, which is 6.34%.…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A stock is expected to pay no dividends in the next two years. It will pay a dividend of $2.50 in year three. For years four and five the earnings are expected to increase at the rates of 30% and 25% respectively before settling on a constant growth of 7%.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Based on this information, the ValueLine 1995 expected dividend, and the annual rate of dividend change for the growth estimate,…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Lintner (1956) was the first empirical study on dividend policy, he revealed that dividend add value to the shares of a firm. The turning point in theoretical modeling of dividend was the brilliant paper of Modigliani and Miller (1961) of dividend Irrelevance. Since the postulation of dividend irrelevance, financial economists have argued via two major schools of thought; those who believe dividend is relevant and those that believe dividend is not relevant. Despite the theories by academics to examine dividend policy, the dividend picture is still puzzling.…

    • 4738 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays

Related Topics