Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Cause of the Berlin Crisis

Good Essays
1503 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cause of the Berlin Crisis
On June 15th 1961, Walter Ulbricht, Leader of the GDR, famously said “Niemand hat die Absicht, eine Mauer zu errichten!" ("Nobody intends to put up a wall”) however two months later the Berlin wall was up and at the climax of U.S, U.S.S.R political international relations.
What began as one could describe as a “shotgun marriage” of the world’s two super powers, America and the Soviet Union, soon escalated out of error and miscalculation through both sides to a situation in which the world was put on the brink of a global nuclear catastrophe. This act would eventually cost America eight trillion dollars, affect the lives of nearly 100,000, ruin many others and lead America into the true horrors of south East Asia.
America and the Soviet Union’s cooperation to defeat Nazi Germany during World War Two was always an alliance of convenience for the common good, and as the end of the war grew closer it only “magnified the growing distrust each great power harboured about the others intentions in an environment of ill-defined borders, altered allegiances, power vacuums and economic ruin.” This conflict between Capitalist America and the communist Soviet Union did not occur because of ideological differences, but rather they confronted each other through lack of understanding and miss-interpretation of each other’s foreign policy. Because of their different views over the future of Eastern Europe, how they perceived the other on the international stage and the Marshall plan what began as a coalition for the common good of both Countries soon climaxed into a Bi polar power struggle that would have implications throughout the world.
One important miscalculation that was the first of many errors on both super powers foreign policies was there entirely different interpretations of what was to become of Eastern Europe after the destruction of Nazi Germany. This conflict was over whether post war Germany should be handled in Russia’s preferred repression or America’s rehabilitation to keep Germany pacified. The American state department worried about the long term financial difficulties happening throughout Europe and therefore saw strengthening the German industry to its former position as a positive. It continued support for a moderate peace as the best guarantee against future aggression. While it called for measures on August 1949 which would guarantee payment of “restitution and reparations to Germany’s victims, prevent reconversion of Germanys economy to war purposes and eliminate German economic domination in Europe” the plan also proposed integrating the defeated Reich into the type of economy envisaged by the Atlantic Charter. Washington officials knew what they wanted, “maximum possible self-determination for the people of the region without impairing the unity of the grand alliance.” However when the Big three meet in Teheran 1943 the full measure of Stalin’s determination to stop a future threat existing in Germany became apparent. Stalin repeatedly emphasised the need to destroy any hope of German rehabilitation and prevent rearmaments and at one point proposed to “liquidation of between 50,000 and 100,000 members of the German officer corp.” Furthermore Stalin envisioned buffer states in front of the U.S.S.R, which would help to defend the Soviet Union in case of a future European war and more importantly gave Stalin a sphere of influence in Eastern Europe. At this time of the alliance Stalin took a view that “this war is not as in the past, whoever occupies territory can also impose his own social system as far as his army can reach.” Therefore both superpowers misconception of the future of Europe directly set in motion a conflict that would slowly boil up and escalate into the Berlin crisis. The error on both parts was that at Yalta both Super powers went away as the conflict over reparations and the treatment of Germany proved too deep to resolve. Instead of agreeing on an arrangement before the end of the war in which these policies would be implemented both super powers went to Eastern Europe and implemented their own policies on either area of influence, creating a future conflicting issue on both sides.

Furthermore the Marshall Plan, America’s principal plan for rebuilding and creating a stronger foundation for the allied countries of Europe was one of the pivotal acts that through misinterpretation destroyed Soviet American relations. The Marshall Plan became a four year program that would cost the American people approximately $13 billion dollars before it ended in 1952. Although its impact on the Western countries was a promising one, it severally destroyed the relationship between the two former allies the Unities States and the Soviet Union marking an important stage in the development of the Cold War. What began on June 1947 as a helping hand to Eastern Europe because William Clayton reported to Washington that "millions of people are slowly starving,” soon destroyed U.S, U.S.S.R relations. The Soviets perceived the Marshall plan entirely differently from that of America. They read these plans as a prelude to the “remilitarization of western Germany and its transformation into the armed instrument of America’s Anti-soviet coalition,” and Subsequent Soviet propaganda portrayed the plan as an American plot to subjugate Western Europe. The Soviet rejection of the Marshall Plan in summer of 1947 has long been viewed as the turning point towards the development of the Cold War. After 1947, it was no longer simply differences on individual issues that divided the members of the wartime anti-Hitler coalition. But the Soviet rejection of the plan was not merely the implementation of a policy of confrontation with the West, rather it was a backlash against what was perceived and misinterpreted as an American attempt to dominate the post-war world with economic aid and undermine the security of the USSR. The Soviet ambassador to the United States, Nikolai V. Novikov, emphasized the underlying political aspects of the Marshall Plan in a telegram to Soviet Foreign Ministry Molotov on June 24th: "...it is directed toward the establishment of a West European bloc as an instrument of American policy..." officials at the Kremlin felt that the United States was exploiting Europe's difficulties, that American imperialists wanted to gain control over the economies of those countries that participated in the Marshall Plan and they publicly warned that those who participated in the program would lose control of not only their economies, but also over their political sovereignty. This error of Soviet foreign policy; that the Marshall plan was an attack on the Soviets influence in Europe and not just financial aid was the final straw in the destruction of cooperation in the peace that followed the end the World War II so far as Soviet leaders were concerned. The tension was building for Russia who knew they would have to try something to drastically gain back their influence in Germany.
More importantly the most pivotal point in the detereation of Soviet U.s relations was the miscalculation by the soviets attempting to stop the currency reforming happening in West Berlin. On 1 June, America and Britain announced that they wanted to create the new country of West Germany; and on 23 June they introduced a new currency into ‘Bizonia’ and western Berlin. The Soviets refused to accept this proposal, hoping to continue the German recession in keeping with their policy of a weak Germany. The Soviets refused to honour the currency, even in Berlin, but Allies had already smuggled two hundred and fifty million Deutschmarks into the city, and it quickly became the standard currency in the western zones. The new currency, along with the Marshall Plan that backed it, appeared to be able to revitalize Germany against the wishes of the Soviets. Worse, by introducing the currency into western Berlin, it threatened to create a bastion of economic resurgence deep within the Soviet zone. Although the currency reform in theory was the trigger of the Berlin crisis, in retrospect it was the soviets actions of suspending all rail, road and air traffic into Berlin from the west as an attempt to put pressure on the U.S to call off or at least modify their plans for unification and economic revitalising. Stalin thought this action would at least make America reconsider but in reality all it did was push the American Foreign policy into a hard-line anti-Soviet position. Stalin himself no longer trusted his former allies.

The Soviet-American relationship became characterized by substantial tensions, mitigated only by continuing negotiation and no clear action. The deterioration of relations within the Grand Alliance led to the great conflict known as the Cold War. From the Soviet misconception, the United States alienated the USSR through a series of challenges, culminating with the Marshall Plan, while in opposition the Americans viewed the U.S.S.R as an ideological identity only concerned with the takeover through military of Europe. This miscalculation on both sides was essentially what created the Cold War.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    HTST 386 final exam

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It was the clash between capitalism and communism that caused the Cold war in the first place. Looking all the way back to the issue of Germany and its division post-WWII, and leading to the Berlin crisis, evidence is obvious that the United States and Soviet Union’s different polices with respect to governing their portions of Germany led to the ‘plantation of the seeds of mistrust’. In Addition, the fact that European countries had been devastated by the Second World War further fueled this clash of ideals between superpowers, since Soviets were trying to absorb them into their sphere of influence by offering benefits through means of the Warsaw Pact. On the other hand, the U.S. had implemented the Truman Doctrine in order to stop communism from spreading further, most notoriously providing financial aid to Greece and Turkey. As a result, the Cold War was truly put into full gear; the clash of spheres of influence was imminent, it was East Germany vs. West Germany, NATO vs. the Warsaw Pact, Capitalism vs. Communism.…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    After the end of the Second World War, the world was left with two superpowers with competing ideologies: The United States of America and the Soviet Union. The Americans had come out of the war with a surging economy and served as the flagship for the capitalist nations of the West. The Soviets on the other hand practiced Communism, an ideology that was seen as a great threat to the Western way of life. 1 Though they had been allied at the end of the war, both nations quickly moved to bolster their military and economic infrastructure to prepare for the era of pseudo-colonialism and competition between the two powers they both knew would follow. By 1949, the Soviets would become the world’s second nuclear power, launching most of the world into a full out cold war between the communist East and the capitalist West. Competition between these ideologies meant that each side would fight to protect their influence in foreign nations, to spread their ideologies to new nations, and to protect against the spread of their enemy’s ideology to new nations; a policy the West…

    • 2308 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Lewis Gaddis Summary

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this book writer, John Lewis Gaddis has talked about how Russia and eastern Europe are changing the way history specialists take a gander at the icy war. The primary contention that was made by the writer in this book was " How Soviet's perspective of one-sided security crashed into US's conviction that security is multilateral to create two ranges of prominence: one of compulsion and one of assent." The Partners Atlantic Contract, August 1941,Roosevelt, and Churchill announced 3 Wilsonian after war goals to guarantee global security through a multilateral approach: self-assurance, open market, and aggregate security. Stalin had firmly connected state security with his very own security and trusted security must be accomplished by denying every other person of it and picking up an area while the US thought of security as an aggregate decent inescapable clash.…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ww1 Unit 4

    • 4634 Words
    • 19 Pages

    How did ‘The Marshall Plan’ further divide Western and Eastern Europe, and what were Stalin’s reasons for encouraging Eastern Europe to not accept US…

    • 4634 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the start of the first world war, Germany and the Soviet Union signed a nonaggression pact. With Germany and the Soviet Union being allies, the rest of the world had their suspicions. In the U.S., Senator Truman expressed his dislike of both countries and his view of them as potential enemies(Doc A). Unfortunately for the Soviet Union, the pact between him and Hitler was soon broken by a German invasion. The invasion of the Soviet Union on June 22, 1941 was a surprise to everyone, especially Stalin who was not prepared for it. According to Churchill, it was the turning point of the war. This turn on Stalin seemed like a great thing, if the Soviet Union hadn’t collapsed so quickly. With the fear of the Soviet Union’s surrender, Churchill and Roosevelt secretly met in the historic Atlantic Conference in August 1941. An outcome of the conference was the eight-point Atlantic Charter, where Churchill and Roosevelt agreed to defeat Germany before turning to Japan, and they planned for a new world organization, and affirmed their commitment to self-determination for all nations.…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    During the time of post-World War II Soviet geopolitical expansion, the political and economic future of European nations were at stake. Truman described the situation as autocratic regimes undermining democratic countries, using political, economic and military means to re-write and disrupt the western European map of geopolitical influence, alliances and independence (Truman 344). Greece and Turkey asked for military and financial aid from the United States as Great Britain, their former benefactor, was no longer able, or in a position to, support the two struggling nations. The two countries would have fallen if not for the immediate financial support from the United States. (Truman, 1) While the Truman Doctrine only gave support to Greece…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    History Study Guide

    • 2231 Words
    • 9 Pages

    ­ the conflicting U.S. and soviet aims in Eastern Europe ­ the state of hostility…

    • 2231 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ronald Reagan Influence

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During the years of 1947-1991, the World was divided in two, the eastern nations, who believed in Communism and social equality, and those of western nations, who believed in Democracy and free-trade. The world changed a lot during this time, leading from a world divided into a world that was more accepting of foreign ideas. Tensions between the United states and the USSR rose during the Cold War, but feel and disappeared altogether during the end. It was a War fought with espionage and secrecy, instead of combat and bombings. A war with no declaration or actual documentation of conflict, it was the war that lasted 45 years, it was the Cold War.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marshall Aid

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Truman Doctrine was an international relations policy set forth by the U.S. President Harry Truman in a speech on March 12, 1947. The speech stated that the U.S. would support Greece and Turkey with economic and military aid to prevent them from falling into the Soviet sphere of influence. Marshall Aid was the American initiative to aid Europe, in which the United States gave economic support to help rebuild European economies after the end of World War II in order to prevent the spread of Communism. With sufficient evidence, the answer to this essay question will show that even though the Truman Doctrine and Marshall Aid were successful, there were other events more successful than them at containing communism.…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Soviet Russia and the United States were so called ‘’allies’’ however due to the difference and hatred of one another’s governing systems the cold war began to evolve. Both countries knew that getting…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Regan addresses this speech to the Soviet General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev. In explaining and persuading to Gorbachev that there is only one Berlin and not two. There shouldn’t be a wall or a border to divide the west and the east of Berlin. Regan believed the wall was a symbol of control and the freedom that everyone should have was being taken away as the separation between the East and the West. There should only be one Berlin, as Regan said, meaning there should not be a division.…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Apush Containment Essay

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The year of 1945 was a time of relief for America and its people. That year was the end of World War II. Germany had lost and the time for rebuilding was near. However, the peace did not last long between the Soviet Union and the United States. A difference in political and economic views caused a rift in the Soviet Union and United States relationship of convenience. The Soviet Union was running on a system of government called communism. Communism's theory of a government run by the economy was the complete opposite of America's dedication to independence. This difference caused great tension between the two nations and became a Cold War. The Soviet Union believed that communism was going to overcome capitalism and that they will win the Cold War. America's retaliation to the Soviet Union's spreading of communism was containment. Containment is the attempt to stop the spread of communism. The Cold War split the world into two large groups, those who were under communist rule and those who were against it. The United States was dedicated in their fight against communism with instances like the Truman Doctrine, which vowed to support anyone who was being threatened by communist rule, and The Marshall Plan, which gave over 10 billion dollars to European countries in the effort to rebuild the damage done during World War II. By 1947, the United States and Soviet Union were constantly on their toes and pushing boundaries to see who would gain the upper hand in the Cold War.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cold War Containment

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Coming out of a post-World War II the relationship and tensions between America and the Soviet Union lasted for most of the second half of the twentieth century. This so-called war, heightened suspicions, creating a series of international events that brought the world’s two superpowers down to the brink of destruction.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Was the Cold War Inevitable

    • 2933 Words
    • 12 Pages

    The orthodox view of the Cold War elucidates its inevitability due to the great ideological differences that existed between the Soviet Union and United States. On the other hand, the revisionists argued that it happened due to the actions that Soviets took and the consequential responses made by the United States as a result of their inflexible, single-sided interpretations of Soviet action. Yet, even with the backdrop of the early Bolshevik conflict in 1918 as well as the great ideological gulf between the Soviet Union and United states, the cold war could have been avoided in its initial stages under President Roosevelt. However, what really determined it was the series of events that occurred after Roosevelt was succeeded by Truman. The inevitability of the Cold War, at its roots, was due to Soviet aggression and attitudes felt by the United States which was exacerbated from the post war climate of the time. To be precise, it was a combination of the subsequent events that followed Truman’s accession that sealed the unavoidability of the Cold War. American diplomatic policies were dictated by their fears of communism as well as opportunities that arise from modern warfare which aided in the evolution of American foreign policies. In the end, the Cold War was inevitable as a result of the conflict of interest between nations, whether it be the ideological gulf between communism and capitalism or the determining the political future of Eastern Europe, which was ultimately fuelled by the unstable post World War II environment.…

    • 2933 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    setting up in that part of the world was something the United States could live with.” The US was rather more concerned for a mutual benefit and wanted a working relation with the USSR. The U.S. were most interested in the west Europe, they wanted to introduce there ideology, demarcation, by trying not to collaborate, “,” Roosevelt-style—that is, by trying to work hand-in-hand with each other on whatever problems turned up. Instead, they could get along by pulling apart.…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays