Preview

Death with Dignity

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1291 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Death with Dignity
“Death with Dignity” Physician assisted suicide has long been a topic of debate. Those who are in favor and those who are very much against it, make very convincing arguments on both sides of this controversial topic. In November 2012, people of the state of Massachusetts voted on a very controversial petition called the Massachusetts "Death with Dignity" Initiative. This initiative that was defeated, allowed the people of Massachusetts with terminal illness (a terminally ill patient is defined as one who has been given six months or fewer to live) the right to request and obtain lethal drugs by their physician in order to end their life. The “Death with Dignity” initiative stated that before the lethal drugs were allowed to be given, the patient requesting the medication had to be mentally capable of making medical decisions, required to verbally request them two times as well as submit the request in writing, and have both verbal and written requests witnessed. The initial verbal request must be fifteen days prior to the written request and second oral request. The patient's terminal diagnosis and capability to make health care decisions must also be confirmed by a second doctor (Galvin.)
Before the people of the State of Massachusetts voted on the “Death with Dignity”
Initiative. Three states had passed the “Death with Dignity” act: Oregon, Washington, and
Vermont. Oregon was the first to pass the “Death with Dignity act (DWDA) on October 27,

1997. Since the law was passed in 1997, a total of 1,050 people have had DWDA prescriptions

written and 673 patients have died from ingesting medications prescribed under the DWDA

(Oregon Health Authority.) For those who are not opposed to the “Death with Dignity”

Initiative, believe that what is currently taking place in states of Oregon, Washington, and

Vermont is historic and one day will be adopted by the remaining forty-seven states. For

those who are

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    There are many fears that go into suffering through a disease, and a majority of the people that utilized the prescriptions were fearing the loss of dignity during their time of pain and suffering. This act allows the anguish, for the patient and their family, to cease. There is an immense amount of pain that a family goes through watching loved ones anguish in their last days, as shown by Anita Freeman. “I watched my 66-year-old sister die in pain from stage 4 liver cancer. It took five weeks and it was excruciating for the both of us.”…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    five out of fifty states allow someone to die with dignity meaning allow them to…

    • 1426 Words
    • 1 Page
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When we think about the idea of physician- assisted suicide, we most likely feel as though that the act itself should be considered murder. During 1997, The President at the time Bill Clinton signed into regulations “The assisted suicide funding restriction act”. The regulation omitted the use of federal monies to pay for physician assisted suicide, as well as euthanasia, and also mercy killings in the United States. According to the New England Journal of Medicine Physician assisted suicide is now currently legal in three states, they are Oregon, Washington,…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    He founded Oregon Death with Dignity Act in 1993. During the decade of the policy, there were definitive terms that defined the policy and what it meant to ‘die with dignity’. The state was torn into two, with the policy barely passing by 51% percent to 49% percent. There was much speculation and appeal on the policy creating a debate but with much hurdle, the federal court allowed the policy to become into effect. The entire idea of aiding in death enters in the 1900’s, showing that this issue has been constantly be questioned throughout history. I believe that educating the public about the policy and what the end-goal is for individuals with sound minds the right to choose. Involving physician’s care and expertise on if a patient is eligible and in control of their death is the hope. There were 5 states that this law is legal under the federal court: Oregon, Washington, Vermont, Montana, and New Mexico. Recently California passed this legislation in September 2015 but has not yet been taken into effect. History is in the making, and the goal of this act is provide dignity, comfort, support and…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    With the election just around the corner, many ballot questions throughout the United States are extremely controversial and one of these issues is evident in the state of Massachusetts. On November 6th, 2012, the citizens of Massachusetts will be asked to vote on the “Death with Dignity” initiative, also known as, “Question 2” which will appear on the general election ballot. This initiative is a law which will enable those who are diagnosed with a terminal illness, to obtain lethal prescription medications and use them as a more comfortable, controlled means of death. An option provided to these terminally ill people as an alternative to the drawn out and unbearably painful final months of life produced by their illness. A more specific description of the initiative is as follows: “According to the text of the initiative, the proposed measure would allow for a terminally ill patient to be given lethal drugs. A terminally ill patient would be defined as a patient being given six months or fewer to live. The patient requesting the medication must be mentally capable to make medical decisions while consulting their respective doctors. Patients would be required to submit their request orally twice and witnessed in writing, and the initial verbal request must be fifteen days prior to the written request and second oral request. The patient's terminal diagnosis and capability to make health care decisions must be confirmed by a second doctor” (mass.gov). Although, providing such drugs to people who are terminally ill appears to be a good idea there are many problems that must be addressed before the ballot should be passed.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Euthanasia, often referred to as mercy killing, easy death, or right to die, generates strong feelings both pro and con as proponents of each side passionately argue their ideological stance. The broader concept is often missed with the attention placed on the narrow view of physician-assisted suicide. Many have little or no tolerance or understanding of the patient’s position feeling there is no quality of life in their present circumstance or condition and as such, they have a personal choice or entitlement to end their life or have someone else assist them in ending it in order to cease their own personal, unbearable, suffering and/or pain. Currently, this type of practice within these United States is deemed unacceptable and unlawful except within the states of Oregon, Washington, and Montana (Marker,…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Should physicians be granted the power to intentionally end the lives of their patients? Recent proposals to legalize physician-assisted suicide have raised this question and triggered intense legal, medical and social debate. For some individuals, the debate is fueled by their fear that medical technology may someday keep them alive past the time of natural death. However, this concern is unfounded for mentally competent adults who have a legal right to refuse or stop any medical treatment. It is also important to recognize that today's health care climate lends itself more to undertreatment than overtreatment.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DWDA

    • 1244 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Over the past two weeks we have been learning about different peoples views on the Death With Dignity Act. The Death With Dignity Act allows terminally ill Oregon residents to end their lives through voluntarily administering themselves lethal medication, given to them by a doctor for that purpose. Patients who want a prescription must be a resident of Oregon, Washington, or Vermont, 18 years or older, capable of making and communicating health care decisions for them-selves and diagnosed with 6 months, or less, to live. After first requesting a prescription from your doctor, you must wait for fifteen days and then go back and confirm that you still want to end your life. Your doctor then will make you wait 48 hours before you can pick up the lethal prescription. Hardwig believes that in certain circumstances you have a duty to end your life. I agree with Hardwig and believe that the Death With Dignity Act should be passed in all states because it is a humane way to end someone’s suffering.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dr. Self-Annihilation

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In a Dr. system, the selection of self-annihilation are permissible solely on the end treatment choices don't seem to be operating, the foremost effective of health service and treatment has didn't cure the painful illness, and if the mentally stable patient continues to charm the assistance of ending his existence. Then with the family opinion and agreement, a doctor would be permissible to bring down the drug that the patient may use to commit death at a time of the patient's selection.…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    From back-to-back executions, rescheduling executions, to death penalty states hoarding drugs, drug companies blocking the use of their products for lethal injections, and Arizona allowing death row inmates to bring their own execution drugs, 2017 has seen increased scrutiny on the humaneness of lethal injections. While physician participation in executions is nothing new, in light of recent news events, it is essential to revisit the ethics of physician involvement in lethal injections.…

    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Death with Dignity

    • 4342 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Thesis: Is the fear of living an incomplete and possibly painful life a reason to bring your life to an end? Does this fear give us the authority to be masters of our own fate and end our own life before we and the ones we love suffer?…

    • 4342 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    A. According to Starks, Dudzinski & White the Death with Dignity law requires eligible people must be competent and have a limited life expectancy of about six months or less to be eligible to receive the self-administered drug (Starks, Dudzinski & White, 2013). a. Although it is required a person have an expectancy of six months to live Wesley Smith stated that a terminally ill patient was prescribed and received a lethal prescription two years before he naturally died (Smith, 2006). b. Smith also states the patient whose death was reviewed afterward was permitted to keep his pills even after being hospitalized as delusional (Smith,…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Melinda Lee, M.D. in an article for the New England Journal of Medicine, "1375 (Oregon) physicians (50%) were not confident that they could predict that a patient had less than six months to live. Moreover, 761 (28%) indicated that they were not confident they could recognize depression in a patient who requested a prescription for a lethal dose of medication" (Marker). The Journal of the American Medical Association also did a survey regarding physicians' attitudes. A questionnaire was mailed in February 1999 to Oregon physicians eligible to prescribe under the Death with Dignity Oregon act. Of the 3981 physicians, 2461 (66%) returned the questionnaire. Only 73 physicians indicated that they were willing to write a lethal prescription. Of those, 27% were not confident they could determine whether or not a patient had less than six months to live (Oregon Physicians). Since the law has been passed in Oregon, an HMO has actually had to solicit doctors willing to give a lethal overdose. Kaiser Permanente had to resort to sending out a memo to 829 physicians asking them to submit their name to a Kaiser administrator if they were willing to give a lethal overdose to patients. The memo complained that the Ethics Service could not find a physician to give deadly drugs to a patient who was suffering and dying for three weeks (HMO Seeks). One has to wonder why the patient was not adequately…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    the same should be filed at earliest opportunity time and in all cases where issues are…

    • 2865 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marketing plan

    • 4728 Words
    • 19 Pages

    Further Information: (e.g. state if extension was granted and attach evidence of approval and Revised Submission Date)…

    • 4728 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays