Preview

Essay On Sharecropping In African American Freedmen

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
653 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay On Sharecropping In African American Freedmen
Economic freedom is the fundamental right of every person to control his or her own labor and property while political freedom is the freedom to exercise one’s rights as guaranteed under the laws of the country. In 1865 the African American Freedmen were finally given these rights under the 13th Amendment. It is not possible for the Freedmen to become politically free since they are not economically free because of the Vagrancy Act, the effect sharecropping had on their ability to make their own decisions, and the black codes implemented by the Southern States. The Vagrancy Act, passed in 1866, forced into employment any person who appeared to be unemployed or homeless. If these “vagrants” ran away they would be recaptured and would be forced to work for no compensation while wearing ball and chains. At this time, over 4 million African American slaves were just freed from slavery and were in search of jobs and lost family members. All the …show more content…
This became a new of form of slavery in the South. Many problems emerged from sharecropping. Freedmen were forced into an unending cycle of debt. They had no money to buy tools or seeds, which caused them to borrow supplies from the landowners. The plantation owners got to pick how much they charged for the supplies and what crops they would plant. This took away their economic freedom, freedmen were no longer allowed to decide what they produced to make money. The plantation owners had control over their lives because they owed them money. They influenced their decisions and limited their ability to participate in society. If the plantation owner told them that they could not vote, then they would not. This shows how their lack of economic freedom contributed to the loss of their political freedom. Therefore, this proves that It is not possible to be politically free if you are not economically

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sharecropping was just a step up from slavery, but it allowed newly freed slaves to "somewhat" have something of their own. I say somewhat because their former master still had control over them because they had to sign a sharecropping contract. This sometimes required them to work 10 hours a day and also in harsh conditions. If the sharecropper went against the contract then it would be deducted from their pay. However, through this they were not land owners. They got paid for their work, but some of that money went to taking care of their family and the rest went to paying back debt they owe. They would ultimately in this cycle of owing because they do not make…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    After the devastation left from the Civil War, many field owners looked for new ways to replace their former slaves with field hands for farming and production use. From this need for new field hands came sharecroppers, a "response to the destitution and disorganized" agricultural results of the Civil War (Wilson 29). Sharecropping is the working of a piece of land by a tenant in exchange for a portion of the crops that they bring in for their landowners. These farmhands provided their labor, while the landowners provided living accommodations for the worker and his family, along with tools, seeds, fertilizers, and a portion of the crops that they had harvested that season. A sharecropper had "no entitlement to the land that he cultivated," and was forced "to work under any conditions" that his landowner enforced (Wilson 798). Many landowners viewed sharecropping as a way to elude the now barred possession of slaves while still maintaining field hands for labor in an inexpensive and ample manner. The landowners watched over the sharecroppers and their every move diligently, with harsh supervision, and pressed the sharecroppers to their limits, both mentally and physically. Not only were the sharecroppers just given an average of one-fourth of their harvest, they had "one of the most inadequate incomes in the United States, rarely surpassing more than a few hundred dollars" annually (Wilson 30). Under such trying conditions, it is not hard to see why the sharecroppers struggled to maintain a healthy and happy life, if that could even be achieved. Due to substandard conditions concerning sharecropper's clothing, insufficient food supplies, and hazardous health issues, sharecroppers competed on the daily basis to stay alive on what little their landowners had to offer them.…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Free blacks weren’t free because they couldn’t vote. Most states did not let blacks to vote which was unfair. Over half of the states did not allow voting for blacks (Doc A chart). Some states had black voting but it was restricted. “A $250 property requirement kept most black new Yorkers from voting. For example, of 11,000 blacks in New York City in 1855, 100 could vote” (Doc A chart).…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They were taking away their freedom that they had been given after the civil war by making them work for free like they did when they were…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assignment 1 AMH2020

    • 654 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During reconstruction, the meaning of freedom suited many different types of interpretation; the perception of freedom between former slaves and their slaves masters were very contradictory. To begin with, African-Americans had suffered severe abuse over those years of slavery, so to them, the meaning of freedom was basically a hope that in the future, they won’t experience all kind of punishment and exploration that they have been experienced so far. Besides that, formers slaves were demanding equal civil and political rights. In the same way, they valued their freedom by establishing their own schools and churches, reuniting families that were separated under slavery and seeking financial dependence. Foner (2014) supports the same argument: “Blacks relished the opportunity to demonstrate their liberation from the regulation, significant and trivial, associated with slavery. They openly held mass meeting and religious services free of white supervision” (p. 557) . In addition, Foner (1014) also found “Former slaves’ ideas of freedom, like those of rural people throughout the world, were directly related to landownership” (p. 560) . On other hand, their slaves masters’ perception of freedom was different. For example, most Southerners reacted the emancipation with dismay, according to Foner (2014) , Southern leaders didn’t want to accept reality “Freedom still meant hierarchy and mastery; it was a privilege not a right, a carefully defined legal status rather than an open-ended entitlement” (p. 561) .…

    • 654 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I think the purpose of the earlier vagrancy law (1274) was to help the sick and homeless, and give help to the churches for the food they gave to them. When it was revised in (1349) it made it a crime to help anyone that was able to work, so I think they were trying even back then to get people to work and help themselves instead of relying on someone else to do it. Today we try to get people off welfare and get them to work, but it is still a work in progress I think. They soon started putting people in prison for vagrancy, in 1351 you could not quit a job you had without good reason or you would go to jail, I guess because with no job then you would go back to being a vagrant again and that’s what they were trying to stop. This would help the landowners get and keep cheap labor, because it was unlawful to turn down any paying job also. This was intended to make people work so the landowners would not have to compete for laborers. The punishments got a lot stiffer over time for the law of vagrancy, you could be whipped for two days and after the third offense you would get whipping, standing on a pillar and an ear cut off!: I think their changing social structure also has to do with this law changing and making it a felony, so there are now trying to keep felons off the street instead of just vagrant’s if Ai read it right. Well I bet that made some people just take innocent people in that couldn’t find work, and say they were vagrants then they would be branded on the chest with a V and if they tried to run branded with an S on their forehead and have to be that persons slave for two years, what a way for some people to get free workers dang.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a result “[plantation owners] turned increasingly to the use of slaves, who were regarded as a safer source of labor and were less expensive.” Because of this shift, it made indentured servants and slaves less unified against the rich, which led to a more stabile society for plantation…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An eight-year-old African American boy sat on the floor of his church. His mother and father were talking quietly in the corner. He only heard pieces of the conversation. Things like “abolitionist” and “segregation” were repeated often. Many questions ran through his head. Questions like ‘Why do the whites have separate churches?’ And ‘Why is my dad not allowed to practice medicine?’ There were 221,000 free blacks in the sixteen Northern states in 1860. That is 4.9% of the African American population. They were called “free”, but did they really have liberty? Free people act as they wish and are unimpeded by others telling them what to do. Based on the political, social and economic rights of blacks in the North, we can conclude that they were not very free in comparison to the whites around them.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Black people were not very free at all in the North because they were not allowed to complete basic tasks such as shopping, dining out, or buying land. If the title for free black people was “free blacks” than they should have actually been free. “We shall not make the black man a slave, we shall not buy him or sell him; but we will not associate with him” (Document B line 1,2,3). Black people should have been allowed to do some basic things, atleast shopping for food and clothes, or buying the land that they want. “No one will employ…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The use of slavery to paradoxically define American freedom is first shown by the use of Jefferson, the “slaveholding spokesman of freedom”(Morgan). His attitude toward slavery can be shown in two ways. The first of which is debt. Debt is a force that can hold down any free man and this was why Jefferson hated debt so much. As a planter, he was basically forced into debt and resisted giving up his slaves until he found his freedom from that debt. He did not care about the freedom of his slavery as he did for his own. Jefferson also stated that a nation would be very fertile for tyranny if the men of a nation did not have enough land or money to support their families. This is paradoxical because the slaves live in a world of tyranny where the master is there monarch and the slave has no land or money to support their families. His second dislike was artisans. He stated that they lived dependent lives because they were dependent on the customer and had no other business or land to fall back on. Jefferson, on the other hand, liked farmers because they were very independent and always had a source of income. Jefferson states “the man who depended on another for his loving could never be truly free” (Morgan). This shows that Jefferson is willing to fight for the artisans who are dependent but does not want to forgo his slaves. Although freedom was rising for those who were dependent on others, the same dependent slaves had no improvements in liberty.…

    • 670 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin with, in “South Carolina Declaration of Secession” it states, “Government cannot endure permanently half slave, half free”. This means, America could not handle both slave and free because it was very hard to. If we were to keep having slavery we would not be the United States of America because we would be half slave and half free states. To conclude, this is why politics had the biggest impact on reaching the Civil…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Free African American during the post-revolutionary war era experienced violence, prejudice, segregation and disenfranchisement. Many states had laws prohibiting free blacks from residing in them at all or required registration and bonds. Free black men and women feared capture and being sold into slavery, as they had a difficult time proving their status. Prominent black leaders became social activist and petitioned the Congress, state governments and ultimately the people for fair treatment of an entire race of both free and enslaved blacks.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compromise Of 1850 Essay

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It angered free states as it made it a federal responsibility to return fugitive slaves to their owners, and made it a felony to interfere. In addition, it denied the fugitive’s right to a jury trial, instead instituting special commissioners who would be paid more for “returned” slaves, than if alleged fugitives were released. This opened the door for free people of color to be captured and sent to the South, and with no legal way, or right to plead their case, they were defenseless.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While African Americans were no longer considered slaves they often found themselves crawling back to former owner because they had nowhere else to go. Many of these Freedman were short on cash, so they attempted sharecropping. This was the process of renting land and tools from a landowner, and in turn a share of their profits would go to the landowner. This fight seem like a fair deal, but it wasn't. Many landowners cheated their sharecroppers out of money and charged them excess amounts. This just lead to the sharecropper becoming more in debt and forced them to stay and work for the landowner, making sharecropping nothing but a less obvious form of slavery. In the north, freedmen could get jobs in factories, but they were paid significantly lower salaries than white men. Document D shows how much of the population was dependent on sharecropping to make a living due to the lack of better opportunities. Aside from the already wealthy landowners this did not help many people economically, especially newly freed slaves. Therefore the economic standing of African Americans saw almost no change during reconstruction.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1860-1877, Slaves were considered to to free, but they really weren’t. An example would be from the Black Codes in Opelousas, Louisiana stated, “No negro shall be permitted to rent or keep a house within the limits of the town under any circumstances.” This literally says that freed slaves were not free. If they were free, whites would let them rent, buy and keep a house, but in this instance the whites are not letting them do that. Imagine how the other codes sound. Henry Adams is a former slave who made a statement to the government and stated, “You had better carry a pass. I said, I will see whether I am free by going without a pass. I met four white men about six miles south of town. One of them asked me who I belonged to. I told him…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays