The ethics involved in this particular case are disproportioned because Jerry is neither a doctor nor a nurse practitioner. His line of neither work nor medical training qualifies him to prescribe medication to a patient. Even though the patient professes to be a personal friend of the doctor, he is not privileged to make that decision. Additionally, it would not matter if the medication was simply a blood pressure medication. Whether it is friend of the doctor or not Jerry is required to refer the patient’s request to the doctor in charge, especially because he is the only one in the office.…
Jerry should consider the following advice. He should not call in the refill for the Valium or any other medications without the doctors’ knowledge. He would need to remind the patient about the office refill policy if they have one. Jerry should do what he can to notify Dr. Williams of the need. Jerry would need to tell the patient he is not legally able to call in this prescription without the knowledge and authorization of Dr Williams. Jerry needs to be sure he understands what his scope of practice allows him to do so he does not put himself or Dr. Williams in a situation where they could be…
In this work ACC 410 Week 4 Discussion Question 2 Ethics Case you will find right answers on the following task: "Harris Fell, CPA and member of the AICPA, was engaged to audit the financial statements of Wilson Corporation. Fell had half-completed the audit when he had a dispute with the management of Wilson Corporation and was discharged. Hal Compton, CPA, was promptly engaged to replace Fell. Wilson Corporation did not compensate Fell for his work to date; therefore, Fell refused to allow Wilson Corporation…
The scenario, which this paper will examine, involves Jerry McCall, an office assistant with training as both a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and a medical assistant. Jerry, alone in the office, receives a call from a patient asking him to call in a prescription for Valium to a local pharmacy. The patient states that he is heading to the airport and is in need of the prescription. The patient also relays to Jerry that he is a friend of Dr. Williams and that Dr. Williams usually gives him some Valium before he flies.…
“Jerry McCall is Dr. Williams’s office assistant. He has received professional training as both a medical assistant and a LPN. He is handling all the phone calls while the receptionist is at lunch. A patient calls and says he must have a prescription refill for Valium, an antidepressant medication, called in right away to his pharmacy, since he is leaving for the airport in thirty minutes. He says that Dr. Williams is a personal friend and always gives him a small supply of Valium when he has to fly. No one except Jerry is in the office at this time”.…
In Jerry’s situation, he really doesn’t have the medical training to issue or refill any medication orders because he is just a doctor assistant. If a patient found out that the medical assistant was issue any…
“It depends on how careful they were, if they were there at all. We’re checking on that.”…
Understanding the definitions of a licensed practical nurse, LPN, and a medical assistant, MA is the first step to making a factual conclusion for this case study. Support staff to the provider cannot make decisions about medication refills for patients without a direct order from the provider. This action is outside the scope of practice for an LPN or MA.…
Jerry Dr. Williams 's office assistant is responsible for answering the phone while the receptionist is away from the desk for lunch. Jerry is the only employee in the office when he receives a call from a patient requesting a prescription for Valium be called into his pharmacy immediately, given that he will be heading to the airport in the next 30 minutes. The patient explains that Dr. Williams is a personal friend and provides Valium prior to his flight. The health care ethical standards will be discussed in this case study and determination for the best solution to the situation will be given.…
Dr. Williams assistant Jerry does have the training but does not have the ability to make a call for a patient because if he prescribed the wrong dosage amount then there will be in trouble with the patient and also with HIPAA. It will not be in the best interest of Jerry to make this call for Dr. Williams without making a call to Dr. Williams first. In order for this to happen without breaking any laws, Jerry needs to have communication with Dr. Williams. To keep the integrity of office Jerry should ensure that the proper medication and make sure that it is the patient’s correct prescription if Dr. Williams gives the okay for jerry to provide the Valium for the patient. This might have to be a medication that this patient have to go without on his trip.…
Although Jerry is certified as a medical assistant and a licensed practical nurse (LPN), this does not mean he has the authority to prescribe any form of medication to any person for any reason; it is not in his scope of practice. Jerry’s scope of practice which is what he is allowed to do with in his certifications legally will allow him to take vitals, treat wounds, administer some injections under the supervision of physicians, and in a hospital setting monitor patients on catheters and oxygen provisions. Additionally, Jerry is a medical assistant and is a multi-skilled health care professional who assists with administrative, clerical, and technical support in relation to helping the physician. The scope of Jerry’s training is limited to all of the above mentioned duties and none of them mention that he can administer medications.…
It does not make a difference if the medication that was requested was for the control of high blood pressure instead. It would only be appropriate for Jerry to call in a refill for such a case if there was a standing order for the refill of the Valium. Even if the patient critically needs the medication on a daily basis, it would not be appropriate for Jerry to call in a prescription because it is against the law to do so. If Jerry was to call in a prescription and the patient were to have an adverse reaction, Jerry would only be…
Medications assume an imperative part in the lives of individuals (Procedures and Protocol Research. These are critical in enhancing human wellbeing, in the meantime they are debilitating for the human wellbeing. Methodology and conventions in a medicinal services office are imperative with respect to the taking care of, putting away and checking of medications. You require an exceptionally strict graphing framework set up and a particular arrangement of rules and principles to take after. You require a hierarchy of leadership with uncommon morals, and more than one individual staying informed regarding each and every solution conveyed and disseminated inside of you office. We have extremely strict conventions with regards to taking care of, putting away, and checking medications that must be taken after once a…
The basis in the case of Vo v. City of Garden Grove lies within the debate of what is more important the right of free speech, which is given to all American’s as a right under Article 1 in the Constitutional Amendments, or safety of those using the internet cafes in question. Personal safety is not mentioned in the constitution, but as The United State of America’s second President, John Adams, said in 1798, “our constitution was made only for moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” (Joe, 2005). Although the courts sided with the City of Garden Grove, one judge dissented, saying that the decision infringed upon the right to free speech.…
This case presents a very typical situation that people encounter while working in the corporate environment. What is ethical, what is morally correct and what is just right out against the law are the questions that we all face while working in a corporate environment. Some of the ethical questions are governed by the law facing the situation. For example while working in an investment bank you most probably have access to inside information about upcoming deals that one could possibly use for personal monetary gain or you could act as a tippie and possibly share that confidential information with others. This kind of a situation is definilety governed by the law and you can actually be charged with various insider trading laws and possibly do some jail time as well. The other situation that is presented in the case is purely about ones ethical and moral standards. The analyst either has to compromise her loyalty towards her company B&B or towards her best friend Lori. While the situation presented is not a real zero-sum game, i.e., one player’s loss does not equal to the gain of the other player. When faced in a situation like this one has to think about what decisions can be made that will have the least affect on the players involved. The analyst should not look at the situation she faces as black or white. She should rather think about other options she might have to retain her friend’s loyalty while not compromising her loyalty towards her current employer. For example, Lori has already been laid off by her current employer, Universal group. The Universal group has already broken certain ethical and moral laws by not informing about the situation to B&B. So can the analyst come up with a situation where she can get Lori immediately and legally hired at B&B and convince her to share the information with B&B. In essence Lori will not have to feel guilty about not keeping the information confidential as has been laid off and the…