Preview

Genocide And The Indian Removal Of American Indians

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1745 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Genocide And The Indian Removal Of American Indians
It is indisputable that the Native Americans were wronged by the European settlers. Adamant U.S government officials would threaten native tribes to leave their land so they could selfishly use the land for their own purposes. Andrew Jackson was the driving force in clearing away the Native Americans. He strongly despised American Indians as evidenced by his relentless promotion for their removal. Jackson eventually got his wish when Congress passed the Indian Removal Act which forced American Indians to relocate, thus allowing settlers to use the remarkably fertile Native American land for their own crops and agriculture. From the late 1700’s to the early 1800’s, American Indians had to travel from their homes some 800 miles to now day Oklahoma. …show more content…
Historians who study the Native Americans describe their relationship with settlers as a cruel and, to an extent, racist because the Europeans clearly viewed the American Indians as an inferior race. Although this was a bitter conflict that ultimately led to the removal of American Indians, it is hardly fair to determine the event as a genocide. Ben Kiernan, the director of the Genocide Studies Program at Yale University, argues that genocide is the “only appropriate way” to describe how Natives were treated, but there is no indication extermination was the principle objective of the U.S government. Thorough research proves that the American Indians were much less victims of genocide but more so victims of an unlucky yet inevitable disaster. While there is no doubt the American Indians endured a devastating tragedy, there isn’t enough evidence to prove this suffering amounted to a full-blown

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Pequot Massacre Summary

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Lewy introduces the problem, namely, that it is common for historians to deem the Indians’ plight in American History as intentional genocide on the part of Euro-Americans. He presents numerous historiography in order to validate this problem. He then presents his thesis: “That American Indians suffered horribly is indisputable. But whether their suffering amounted to a ‘holocaust,’ or to genocide, is another matter” (45).…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John L. O’Sullivan had said, “‘... our manifest destiny to overspread the continent allotted by Providence for the free development of our yearly multiplying millions.’” (www.britanica.com) During Andrew Jackson’s term, America had set its sights on the untamed West - which, inconveniently, happened to be the Indians’ territory. President Jackson decided to create a controversial treaty that would allow America to exchange the Indians’ land for a large piece of land in the Louisiana Territory. It was created on May 28, 1830 and sparked much criticism and support throughout the nation. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was justified because the Indians were enemies of America, they were given good land, and they were offered the government’s protection.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All through the historical backdrop of the New World, there has been strife between indigenous populaces and approaching pioneers that usurp the land and assets. The uncovered histories and ficticious belief surrounding the Trail of Tears and the victory of the Incas and other local societies reminds us as readers that genocide and ethnic purifying leaves a sign of an awesome misfortune on American…

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Historical Report on Race

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jaimes, M. A. (1992-01-01). The State of Native America: Genocide, Colonization, and Resistance. South End Press.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    America, the nation started on the idea of a nation free from oppression has a dark often shameful history. The Trail of Tears following the Indian removal act is a perfect representation with direct legislature to prove it. Now I have to say that former president Andrew Jackson was a person I greatly admired and often visited the hallowed statue in New Orleans that stands ever vigilant as a visual tribute the man who stood with few to fight the many and came out victorious. Some historians view Jackson as a very controversial President, However historians will often agree that the Indian Removal Act of 1830 was not popular until, later on in retrospect but at the time seemed to be a viable option.” This area was home to the Cherokee, Creek, Choctaw, Chickasaw and Seminole nations. These Indian nations, in the view of the settlers and many other white Americans, were standing in the way of progress. Eager for land to raise cotton, the settlers pressured the federal government to acquire Indian territory”.(pbs) The Indians being moved, had already been pushed out of the coastal regions now claimed by the new Americas and were now being moved again,…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bartolome de las Casas

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The impressions I had about Columbus’ discovery of the New World are completely destroyed by this firsthand account of the horrible truth concerning the native people of America. In both middle and elementary school, I read about the discovery of Christopher Columbus and the evils of both the settlers and Native Americans. Never before, though, had I heard of the torturous, unprovoked attacks directed at the innocent. Never before had I felt such disgust toward people claiming to be Christians. Never before had I known how good and virtuous the natives, at least a large portion of them, were toward the settlers and in their lifestyles. We spend so much time in our schools learning about the horrors of World War II and about how Jews were discriminated against to the point of extermination towards extinction. Civil rights are also studied, and I am in no way displacing the crucial reminders of what African Americans went through in the United States’ past. However, although history textbooks typically mention settlers taking lands, killing off tribes, and taking advantage of the Indians ignorance in the ways of earthly possessions and worth, all I have ever learned concerning the unfair treatment adds up to nothing more than a single scratch on a gory corpse. Compared to this brief, breathtaking, bone-chilling account, I consider my days as blissfully ignorant over as the ugly facts melt away the sugar-coated excuses of angry, murderous tribes forcing…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Removal Act DBQ

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Since the colonization of America, there have been tensions and confrontations between white settlers and Native Americans over territory and civilization. President Andrew Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act in 1830, allowing him to communicate with Native American tribal leaders in order to negotiate their voluntary relocation to Federal reservations west of the Mississippi River. When several tribes refused to relocate, the conflict turned violent and was conducted through the use of militias and military force. Due to this violent conflict and the subsequent relocation of hundreds of thousands of Native Americans, relations between Native Americans and the United States Government have since been strained. Native Americans continually experience higher rates of poverty, fewer opportunities for educational advancement, higher rates of physical and mental illness, as well as general discrimination through social systems and policy. Strained relationships, societal, and economic opportunities have weakened and are less readily available to Native Americans, all factors that can be traced back to the Indian Removal Act.…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although America had enforced westwards expansion, it did not acknowledge the Native Americans who had settled on the land decades before the white settlers had arrived. From as early as the original 13 colonies in 1776, white settlers had fought and removed the Native Americans from their home territory. Large land grants such as the Louisiana purchase of 1803 and the Treaty of Paris of 1783, had affected the Native Americans the most as that meant that more tribes on these land claims would be removed. From the early news of untouched land from Lewis and Clark, the American spirit had been invoked. With each additional land purchase, Indians had been removed onto reservations or onto neighboring territories.…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The masses of Native deaths got this the title of being a genocide. Even though this was not intentional. The Europeans were actually puzzled as to why the Natives got so sick from these diseases. They had no clue that they had brought dangerous pathogens with them to the New World. The Natives were not immune, unlike the Europeans. The Natives had never been exposed to the diseases. That made them have weak immune…

    • 75 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    False American Ideals As many call the Indian Holocaust, the poor treatment of Indians in America existed the minute Europeans stepped foot on their land. In 1492, Columbus arrived in the New World only to find that it was already inhabited. Still, the Europeans murdered, enslaved, and relocated the Native Americans westward. Still, hundreds of years later in the 1800’s, this indigent treatment of Native Americans still existed.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Jackson, who was the president at the time was the one who porpent the removal of Indians. In 1814, he sent a command out to the U.S. military to remove the Native Americans out of the Southwestern United States. The Natives tried to fight this removal, but most of the way were non-violent. Sadly, their attempts to be able to stay in their homeland…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Removal of the Cherokees

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Trail of Tears was a name given to the cruel journey of the Cherokee Indians that were forced to move west from their native land in Georgia by The United States of America. It was a crucial time in United States history and much of the blame has been put on Americans. But it should be known that removal of the Cherokee tribe has two sides. Removal of the Cherokee Indians happened not only because of White Americans but also from Internal Cherokee Strife. White Americans wanted the Cherokees removed because they valued the Cherokees’ land, Americans felt that Native Americans never have and never could integrate into white society, and also whites felt that the land was rightfully theirs. Internal Cherokee strife also played a role in the Cherokees displacement from different viewpoints within the tribe.…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Forceful Removal of Natives The trail of tears was simply wrong. The trail of tears is one of the saddest events in our nation’s history. We forcefully took land that did not belong to us.…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Native Americans fought in court to stay on their land and even though they won President Jackson still forced them to leave. In 1830 Congress passed the Indian Removal Act because white settlers didn’t want to live with the Native Americans. Andrew Jackson’s reasons for defending the Indian Removal Act were fraudulent and in the eyes of the Native Americans would be unfair and irrelevant. A few reasons would be the Trail of Tears, the Five Civilized Tribes, and the fact that the Cherokee Nation went to court.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Manifest Destiny Thesis

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    At this point it is not necessary to say that the native Americans suffered a great injustice thanks to the manifest destiny but if the snatch of their lands was not enough neither the being forced to move still they lacked much to cross or in this case to suffer.Once the lands rapt what is what followed? Perhaps would be deprive them of their independence by putting them in federal reserves? Or take their children, their clothes and all their beliefs to be molded to white man's society and when they grew up they could be farmers? What would you say if were both? now if it is unfair. The government of the United States tried to mold the Native Americans as a white man due that they thought that they were helping and this was the only way to save them.Not everything was bad thanks to Dawes Act in the year 1887 that had the purpose to divide the land in allotments and to assign them to the native Americans to another of this would be given to citizenship of the United States provided they accepted the law.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays