Preview

Human dignity and freedom of expression in media

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2279 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Human dignity and freedom of expression in media
Human dignity and freedom of expression in the media
[Insert Names of Author(s) here]
[Insert Institution information here]

Author Note

[Insert Author Note here]

[Insert Corresponding Author Information here]

Human dignity and freedom of expression in media
Freedom of expression is the basis of human dignity and one of the human rights, according to the Universal Declaration of Human Right “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers”. However, with the development of the media, the personality and dignity of the human is fading away from the freedom of speech and the press. For example, the recent hot events, two DJs Mel Greig and Michael Christian pretended to be Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Charles in a prank call to the London Hospital to inquire about Kate’s health. Nurse Saldana put their call through to another nurse who revealed details about the Duchess of Cambrige’s health on air. The hoax led to nurse Saldana’s suicide (Quan, 2013). Hence how to guarantee the harmonious development of human dignity and freedom of expression in the media is focused on in the contemporary society and law construction.
In this event occurring in London, we are not easy to judge between right and wrong, just like we could not judge from appearances. Dignity in the crucial sense can support or oppose the priority of either free speech (Wright, 2006).
Based on this, this article will discuss the importance of human dignity and freedom of expression in the media respectively and mutual relations between them.
1. Freedom of expression and hate speech
According to the constitution, Congress shall make no law about the following: to establish a kind of freedom of religion or static belief; restrict freedom of speech or freedom of the press; or limit the power of



References: Quan, Kristene. (2013). Kate Hospital Hoax Suicide: Australian Radio Show Behind Prank Call Canceled. from http://newsfeed.time.com/2013/01/28/kate-hospital-hoax-suicide-australian-radio-show-behind-prank-call-canceled/#ixzz2WRTJlKS3 Wright, R George. (2006). Dignity and Conflicts of Constitutional Values: The Case of Free Speech and Equal Protection. San Diego L. Rev., 43, 527. Zelezny, John D. (2010). Communications law: Liberties, restraints, and the modern media: Wadsworth Publishing Company. Corlett, J Angelo, & Francescotti, Robert. (2002). Foundations of a theory of hate speech. Wayne L. Rev., 48, 1071. Simpson, Robert Mark. (2002). Dignity, Harm, and Hate Speech. Law and Philosophy, 1-28. Hare, Ivan, & Weinstein, James. (2010). Extreme speech and democracy: Oxford University Press. Krotoszynski Jr, Ronald J. (2003). Comparative Perspective on the First Amendment: Free Speech, Militant Democracy, and the Primacy of Dignity as a Preferred Constitutional Value in Germany, A. Tul. L. Rev., 78, 1549.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The United States of America is one of the only country’s on earth that has the right for freedom of press enshrined in its constitution (U.S. Const. amend. I). If you take a second to stop and think about that, we are one of the only countries who have truly ‘guaranteed media freedom’, that is something very special as well as something that is paramount to maintaining a functioning democratic society. It seems as if we almost take for granted the myriad of different sources and outlets that we can pull from and learn from. In this writing I will present you with two different ideologies that weigh in on the media system in America today, one from a liberal’s point of view and one from a conservatives point of view.…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    2) Categorizing media effects: type of outcome, intentionality, levels of outcome, duration of outcome, frequency of cause, and nature of outcome…

    • 2502 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Censorship has always been a hot topic in society. The censorship of today is debated just as it was one hundred years ago. Back then, the author of “The Atlantic Monthly” clearly demonstrated that scenes inappropriate from some should not be freely publicized, and from the censorship seen in today’s society, it is clear that he has a valid point.…

    • 337 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since ancient times, people have realized how important of human rights are and they have been fighting for thousands years to achieve and complete them. The fight for human rights is still happening nowadays. Because of the rise of technology and media, freedom of press is as much important as freedom of speech, especially with journalists. The article “____” written by AUTHOR states that a new law has threaten many journalists in revealing the truth about a food industry. The author uses lots of evidences and arguments to support his idea. By using persuasive techniques such as pathos, ethos, and logos, the author successfully persuade people to against the new law that harms freedom of press.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Altman Denial

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Andrew Altman’s article Freedom of Expression and Human Rights Law: The Case of Holocaust Denial, highlights key aspects of the international discourse on Holocaust denial, and how many concessions can be made under the Human Right to Freedom of Speech. Overall, I found Altman’s arguments to be quite convincing, as there is considerable limitations to the current legal precedence pertaining to Holocaust denial cases. However, Altman’s use of the Brandenburg Doctrine as a foundation for his arguments is not without flaws. Through his comparative analysis of the Brandenburg Doctrine, and the international and European legal systems, Altman places too much emphasis upon American legal conventions, without fully examining the situational context…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Richards, David A. J. “Melville B. Nimmer Symposium: Article: A Theory of Free Speech” UCLA Law Review, 1987…

    • 2295 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    parliament 's enactment of a series of tax levies to pay off a large national…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Herbeck, Tedford (2007). Boston College: Freedom of Speech in the United States (fifth edition) Zacchini vs. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Company 433 U.S. 562 Retrieved on March 2, 2008 from http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/cas/comm/free_speech/zacchini.html…

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jeniffer Madalipay DVM

    • 1176 Words
    • 4 Pages

    positive things in a lot of cases. The questioning of these rights are not secluded…

    • 1176 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thought That We Hate

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The subjects of concern are the brave judges belonging to the 20th Century who were the pillars that laid the foundation of the First Amendment that called for what has widely become lingo – freedom of speech – but which has also become largely distorted and diluted in its meaning, in its context, and in its essence. Lewis reminds us what this amendment in the Constitution truly entails – the restriction laid on the government, the banning of offensive speech on the government’s part, is the focal point of the argument that Lewis puts before his readers. His advocacy for the first amendment and his reminder comes at a likely time for reminders, when the campaigns elections are in full swing, and when the State has been suddenly taken as if by a thunderous storm of hate speech, offensive speech, and what is tantamount to straight up vulgarity. Lewis reminds his audiences and jogs our memories back to the draft in the Constitution that deal so strictly with the issue of offensive speech. A timely judgment on Lewis’ part, this kernel of concentrated thought hits the mark with acute precision and with an iron fist, and puts many a cheek to the red blush of shame, and guilt, and…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    What does freedom of expression really mean? Why is it important to our democratic society? In the landmark case of R. v. Keegstra (1990), the issues of freedom of expression and hate speech is brought in front of the Supreme Court of Canada. The case also deals with issues of whether sections 319(2) and 319(3)(a) of the Criminal Code violated section 2(b) and section 11(d) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The courts view that the objectives of having freedom of speech are correlated with democracy in the sense that for members of society to have their voices heard, they must be free to speak on matters that provide value back to society. This case has served as precedence for other freedom of expression cases. R. v. Keegstra can be looked at through many of the legal principles, but for the purposes of this essay, I will focus on the Offense Principle. This principle, brought forward by Joel Feinberg, is a tangent of John Mill’s Harm Principle, which deals with non-physical harm, such as hate speech. This is evident when looking at R. v. Keegstra, as the Offense Principle is the best principle to articulate why the dissenting judges ruled the way they did. I believe that the lead dissenting judge, Beverly McLachlin, ruled accurately in her judgement and I intend to support this ruling throughout this essay. As well, I will provide a summery of R. V. Keegstra, look at Philosophical principles as…

    • 2805 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Flag Burning

    • 2487 Words
    • 10 Pages

    McDaniel, Ann. "A Burning Constitutional Issue: can Congress Protect the American Flag?" Newsweek. 21 May 1990: 71…

    • 2487 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Freedom of Speech at College

    • 2747 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Cooper, Michael. "Can Free Speech Go Too Far?" New York Times Upfront 142.12 (2010): 8. Academic Search Elite. Web. 29 Mar. 2010.…

    • 2747 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    First Amendment Paper

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages

    References: Balter-Reitz, S. (2003). Free Speech on Trial: Communication Perspectives on Landmark Supreme Court Decisions. Tuscaloosa: University Alabama Press.…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment

    • 1954 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Although the first amendment was written into our constitution, the translation of the meaning of the written word is often challenged. Some people believe freedom of speech should not include hate words, pornography, and vulgar language in our music or on the radio or public television. In addition, there are people who believe in freedom of religion but only if the faith is similar to their own and there is a constant debate regarding freedom of the press and what newspapers should be able to report. Because interpretation of the first amendment is sometimes challenged, some court rulings on important cases regarding freedom of speech, religion, and press have changed some perceptions.…

    • 1954 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays