Preview

Meritor Savings Bank V Johnson Case Summary

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1852 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Meritor Savings Bank V Johnson Case Summary
Analysis: The Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VII, forbids “an employer to … discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s … sex.” Civil Rights Act, 1964. In Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, the court held that “a plaintiff may establish a violation of Title VII by proving that discrimination based on sex has created a hostile or abusive work environment.” Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson (US 1986). A hostile work environment is created when the environment at work creates anxiety so severe as to result in an alteration of the terms and conditions of employment. Hailey Course Pack, p. 140. The burden to prove such an environment was created rests on the plaintiff. The plaintiff must prove that they belong to a protected class; were subject to unwelcomed harassment; the harassment is based on sex, meaning it is not happening to members of the opposite sex; and the harassment alters the conditions of employment. Hailey Course Pack, p. 140. In this case, the court will evaluate whether Black has sufficient evidence to prove her claim of a hostile work environment. Black must first prove that she belongs to a protected class under the Civil Rights Act. The protected classes include race, national origin, color, religion, and sex. Hailey Course Pack, p. 140. “Sex” has been …show more content…
Black does not offer any evidence indicating the comments interfered with her ability to perform her job and never reported the comments for being offensive to her. She did not report the incident of the alleged touch of her buttocks until the day she quit her job. Considering the four factors altogether, Black cannot prove that the conduct affected the terms and conditions of employment. In comparison

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    On Monday August 21st, A body of a 5-year-old boy was found dead in A drive way of a home in West Mobile. The next day a daycare worker had been arrested and charged with abuse of a corpse.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The legal case of Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. is a sex discrimination case under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. “Title VII specifically forbids any employer to … discriminate with respect to compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment in any way that would deprive any individual of employment opportunity due to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.” (Twomey, 2013, p. 397). In this case, Oncale claimed that he was being discriminated against in his workplace because of his sex. In reading the case online, Oncale was “was forcibly subjected to sex-related, humiliating actions against him … in the presence of the rest…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The facts in the case of Thompson V North American Stainless, LP 562 U.S._ (2011) are fairly straightforward. The petitioner in this case, Eric Thompson, was seemingly fired from his job at North American Stainless (NAS) because his fiancée, Miriam Regalado filed a sexual discrimination charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). His suit was filed under Title VII claiming that his dismissal was retaliation for his fiancée’s charge. (Pagnattaro, Cahoy, Magid, Reed, & Shedd, n.d.)…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bsbwor501 Unit 2

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Sexual harassment still exists within our workforce today. A quid pro quo occurrence is less likely to happen because of Title VII bring them from behind closed door; however working in a hostile work environment still reigns ramped. Though both sexes are subjected to this treatment, the fairer sex is usually the victim. In this individual project a supervisor on a work visa has been repeatedly sexually harassing 2 female employees. Even though the supervisor’s superior has been alerted of his behavior, it continues for 3 months. Whether the supervisor on work visa is unfamiliar with…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ‘ makes it an unlawful employment practice for an employer.. To discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex or national origin” (204). The language of the law makes it clear that discrimination is considered unlawful, regardless if a firm’s stance on the issue or whether it states it does not want its employees to be harassed since under Title VII, firms are accountable for workplace behavior. Furthermore, firms under Title VII have a legal responsibility to monitor their employees’ behavior to ensure discrimination is not occurring in the workplace. Therefore, an employee cannot be “ acting on their own,” because he is a representative of the firm he / she works at and as a result his actions make the firm legally…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Indent new paragraph 5 spacesAfter being dismissed from her job at a Meritor Savings Bank, Mechelle Vinson sued Sidney Taylor, a Vice President and branch manager of the bank and Meritor Savings Bank. Vinson charged that she had constantly been subjected to sexual harassment by Taylor over her four years at the bank. She argued such harassment created a "hostile working environment" and was covered by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Vinson sought injunctive relief along with compensatory and punitive damages against Taylor and the bank. Taylor denied allegations of sexual activity and said the accusation were made over a business-related dispute.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Brief Meritor Sav

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After being terminated a female bank employee filed an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.S. §2000e et seq., claiming that she had been sexually harassed by her male supervisor. The US Supreme Court ruled that if the actions of the supervisor were unwelcome, than the respondent had a claim for sexual harassment on the basis of a hostile work environment, even if the sexual acts were voluntary.…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Title Vii Case

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Title VII states that it is an unlawful practice for an employer to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Mary has now vowed to not hire ANY while males in her department after Paul made a backhand comment about why they downsized 25% of their white male workforce in order to be more HR compliant. Paul now feels that that was a wrong decision and that they should hire more white males. Also, Mary is guilty…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (2006). Workplace harassment: double jeopardy for minority women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 426-436. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.426 Women in the workplace, especially minority women, have had many more incidents with being harassed at work. Minority women call it a “double jeopardy” because they are harassed based on being a woman and being a minority, which both come with prejudice. Not only is being a minority woman an issue with harassment, but they are also paid much lower than even just a white woman. The research has four hypotheses; the first being that minority women are harassed more in the workplace, and the second being that there is no relationship between a minority woman and the amount of harassment that they face in the workplace. The third hypothesis is that minority woman, as opposed to white women, are harassed more, and the fourth is that women in general are harassed more in the workplace. The study done in this research was a survey that was sent out to 800 people of different male-dominated and female-dominated corporations. The survey measured different types of harassment, as in sexual, ethnic, and overall. One of the main control variables in this study was the dominant sex of the company. As a result, almost half of the responders reported having been harassed in the workplace, whether ethnically or sexually. Some limitations to this research study could have been the amount of people that they…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Title III Research Paper

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Today 's employment practices were defined by the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The law sanction in the year 1964 bans discrimination in employment based on religion, national origin, race, color, or gender. From the beginning, Title VII has advanced the laws regarding anti-discrimination. The laws are intended to "promote fairness, equality, and opportunity within the workplace" (Bennett-Alexander & Hartman, 2003, p. 5). This paper will reflect on the history and evolution of Title VII and observe its impact in the working environment. This paper will also recognize the people who are protected under the Title VII act. The paper will conclude with reviewing the policies and procedures any business should have implemented to minimize Title VII claims of violations.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ceo Liability Brief

    • 2919 Words
    • 12 Pages

    I believe that our company stands to lose a lot as a result of a successful suit against us by Ms. Pollard. We have reason to believe that if these actions are taken to court, we will find it difficult to deny the allegations and defend ourselves in the lawsuit. Harassment is defined as a punishable offense, and is inappropriate and illegal for company workers, both management and the labor force, to participate in any behavior which is deemed harassing, threatening, demeaning or uncomfortable by the person who is claiming harassment. According to the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, (ADEA), and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, (ADA), and the evidence presented by Ms. Pollard, our workers and management have clearly participated in violations of those orders. A simple defense on our part is to claim that there was no hostile work environment created, and that these incidents were few and far between, however, according to the law petty slights, annoyances and isolated incidents will not rise to the level of illegality, but I believe the amount of abuse that Ms. Pollard has taken, and can prove against us, is clearly enough to reasonably see how she can claim a hostile work environment. The fact that Ms. Pollard may have been 'easy' with some of the other gentlemen or inviting in some other ways does not mean that she has no case. She has voiced her disapproval of her treatment on many occasions and has made…

    • 2919 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It is unlawful to harass a person (an applicant or employee) because of that person’s sex. Harassment can include “sexual harassment” or unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical harassment of a sexual nature (EEOC, 2014). For example, when men in the workplace may constantly call women out their name. A woman may take offense to it even if it is not directed to her in general. In this instance, it could be considered as a hostile work environment.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Of the many employment discrimination laws in force today, the most important is Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Title VII is a wide-ranging employment discrimination provision that prohibits employer discrimination against employees based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. Title VII’s ban on sex discrimination aims at gender-based discrimination against both men and women which includes sexual harassment. Sexual harassment is a form of disparate treatment sex discrimination, because the victim is subjected to different (and disadvantages) terms or conditions of employment because of their sex. Title VII prohibits the employer from allowing an employee to be subjected to unwelcome sex-related behavior that is sufficiently…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    law class

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. Similarly, Courts of Appeals in sexual harassment cases have properly drawn on standards developed in cases involving racial harassment. See, e.g., Carrero v. New York City Housing Auth., 890 F.2d 569, 577 (CA2 1989) (citing Lopez v. S. B. Thomas, Inc., 831 F.2d 1184, 1189 (CA2 1987), a case of racial harassment, for the proposition that incidents of environmental sexual harassment “must be more than episodic; they must be sufficiently continuous and concerted in order to be deemed pervasive”). Although racial and sexual harassment will often take different forms, and standards my not be entirely interchangeable, we think there is good sense in seeking generally to harmonize the standards of what amounts to actionable harassment.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    business law 2

    • 1136 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Oh, you’re a woman, I am not sure you can handle this job.” Wow, who would say that?! This may seem like an antiquated response. However, discrimination can and does still happen in a company, and is not limited to gender discrimination. Consequently, every company is very careful about their operations and employee treatment in today’s business world. Many business entities have put together a human resource department to properly manage and take care of their most valuable resource, their employees. Over the years the government has also helped ensure that employees get proper treatment. Measures such as the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, and Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 have all been put into place to combat against discrimination in the workplace.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays