Preview

Pros and Cons of Free Trade

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1487 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros and Cons of Free Trade
Geography: Pros and Cons of Free Trade

Few can contend that the world is more interconnected and interrelated more than ever. This web of interdependency is primarily made possible by trade, and in the twenty-first century, a large and significant portion of trade is conducted on a global scale. Furthermore, while the majority of people agree that free trade can benefit both parties in terms of economic development and an increase in overall production, many critics have voiced their fears of the negative consequences that may result from a global trade environment with few barriers or limits. Proponents of free trade argue that benefits far outweigh costs and that the primary gain is efficiency of production achieved through comparative advantage and specialization. Others also claim that free trade promotes democracy, and any measures that work towards creating trade barriers results in expenses that will ultimately be passed on to consumers. Increased competition that eventually fuels innovation is another notable benefit to free trade. Therefore, ideally, all these different factors work together in producing economic growth and an improved quality of life for citizens of both nations.

While it 's quite obvious that free trade has various positive aspects, a growing number of skeptics have voiced their concerns in the rising debate over the negative consequences and costs of an open market with few restrictions or limitations. Perhaps the most well known argument against free trade is the threat it poses to domestic jobs and infant industries. Other concerns that are of increasing importance in today 's world are environmental and labor standards that may be adversely affected by laissez faire policies. Furthermore, some individual nation states or those with political power feel that their economic and political sovereignty are threatened by global organizations that regulate worldwide trade. These critics question the statement that all parties are better

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Nafta

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In January 1, 1994, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), a state-of-the-art market-opening agreement, came into force. Since then, NAFTA has systematically eliminated most tariff and non-tariff barriers to trade and investment between Canada, the United States, and Mexico. By establishing a strong and reliable framework for investment, NAFTA has also helped create the environment of confidence and stability required for long-term investment. NAFTA was preceded by the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Nafta

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages

    NAFTA is a free-trade deal that came into action in January 1994, it was signed by U.S. president Bill Clinton, Mexican president Carlos Salinas, and Canadian prime minister Jean Chrétien. The main purpose of the agreement is to eliminate most tariffs on products traded among the United States, Mexico, and Canada. This agreement took away important tariffs in several different industries like, agriculture, textiles and automobiles. The NAFTA agreement also included things like intellectual property protections in the three selected countries. The partners of NAFTA include Canada, United States Of America and Mexico. Removing tariffs were important to this agreement because it allowed balance throughout each country. Mexican tariffs on US made products were 250 percent higher than US duties on Mexican products. NAFTA removed the tariffs creating this balance between the countries when…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fins2622 Notes

    • 6821 Words
    • 6 Pages

     Free Trade: David Ricardo (support free trade) o Theory of comparative advantage: For two nations without input factor mobility, specialisation and trade could result in increased total output and lower costs than if each nation tried to produce in isolation.  Both nations can benefit from trade if each specialises in good that they have the lowest opportunity cost, even if one economy is more efficient in making everything.  However, Comparative advantage in not static, and changes over time in reality.  Also, comparative advantage assumes that factors of production can’t move between countries  therefore comparative advantage is set to be outdated  production and employment usually moves to the lowest cost economies  Reality: Countries encourage exports, but limit imports o Due to mecantalism  i.e. total world wealth is limited and trade is a 0‐sum game if one country benefits, the other loses in order to win, you encourage exports  HOW? Through colanising  therefore legislated that the country could only trade with colonised country.  Who gains from free trade?  Some say that comparative advantage is just a way for developed economies to gain  Because before, developed economies were very protected (in order to establish their industries), and now they want everyone to do free trade (to benefit themselves). Since developed economies developed their industries a long time ago, they usually have a comparative advantage in high technology products (which lead to greater growth compared to agricultural products), whilst the developing countries specialise in the lower growth agricultural products.  Creation of international institutions: GATT, WTO  Creation of trade blocs…

    • 6821 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Harvey N M2 A2

    • 621 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Peter Hann describes free trade as, “generally considered by economists to be beneficial to international trade by encouraging competition, innovation, efficient production and consumer choice” (Hann, 2011 para. 1). Free trade allows freedom of international exchanges; with this there are advantages as well as disadvantages. Some advantages consist of cost advantages, factor earnings, cheaper imports, and an enlarged market (Chand, 2015). Cost advantage allows free trade to warrant a portion of possessions and resources. This in turn leads free trade into the most efficient conduct of economic affairs. Factor earnings and cheaper imports allow production factors to increase while import rates decrease. Enlarging the market is an advantage of free trade because it increases the market allowing labor to be possible. The disadvantages of free trade consist of all countries being in conjunction and working together. Meaning it will only work and be productive if all countries participate, if there is one country that decides not to partake in free trade, it will not work. It is also unfair to and creates a disadvantage to countries for those countries that are unable to compete with larger, advanced countries (Chand, 2015).…

    • 621 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One of the most significant arguments in favor of free trade is its ability to improve economic efficiency. If free trade opens up a market to imports, the consumer benefits from the low priced imports. If free trade opens up a market for imports, then producers benefit from the new place to sell. Supporters of free trade state that free trade in an economy improves welfare for society…

    • 69 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Globalization and free trade are controversial issues that cannot be seen from just one side. The author clearly state that globalization benefits the allocation of resources, increase income, world output, variety of goods and is essentially good for the consumer. However, as I like to say, not everything that shines is gold. Globalization is not the immediate response or salvation for the poor and less developed countries in the world. For me, the so called globalization “backlash” has strong reasons that I respect and understand. However, although I recognize that under a free trade…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Daniel Griswold

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Due to Globalization small businesses have a very hard fight against the global players. Not only because of the intervention of the state, but also because they don’t have the economic power to compete with multinational companies. So I think the argument is not false, that subventions for roads or communication facilities help these multinational firms, but on the other hand they are an indicator for a developing world. The fact, that “free trade” harms small businesses as well may be true, but following to the model of “free trade” and the advantages, it is at the moment the best model for business operations. Due to that, living standards in the whole world are rising and the technological development is growing fast. Daniel Griswold argues that “free trade” helps to produce better products, offers a greater variety of products and services and helps to make products better. From my point of view this is definitely true. So I also think that trade hurdles, as high taxes, doesn’t make sense for a developing world. It is important that trade is “free” to be most effective. From my perspective even small businesses can profit from “free trade”. If someone produces a good that is worth buying, people will buy it. So I think trough techniques as the internet it is now and in future possible to sell it all over the…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    I believe that free trade is beneficial to the United States, Europe, and countries of the Far East. Many say that the free trade has been a blessing in that it has catapulted many individuals out of poverty. Free trade has also created the so called “global middle class. The benefits of it all are quite uneven, due to…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case Study

    • 2618 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The specific benefits of countries joining under the free trade agreements (“FTA”) are likely because of FTA that promotes innovation and competition. This is because it makes the economic sense to buy a product more another who specializes in such production or who can make it more easily or for less cost. Indeed, access to a greater variety of goods and services is the purpose of trade. Imports, then, are not a sacrifice, a necessary evil for the good of exporting. One exports so that one may acquire goods and services in return. This logic is evident on a personal level as well.…

    • 2618 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Is Free Trade a Wayforward?

    • 3320 Words
    • 14 Pages

    In this discussion I will argue that although free trade is said to be the engine for growth, a better way of achieving economic and social development and poverty eradication for the developing and participating countries, the realities behind it is still a mounting hostility with the process it self, especially by the millions around the world who have been thrown into poverty by market liberalizations from free trade agreements. Then I will also discuss some examples on the effects of free trade, as it will provide evidence to our people that free trade practices do not assist in closing economic gaps, but rather they assist in making these gaps wider. And also I will touch a little bit on the key players involve in free trade negotiations. Lastly in this discussion I will express in brief my personal view on this topic "Is free trade a way forward for Solomon Islands?…

    • 3320 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author explains that some of American could get the benefit of free trade. For instance, the investors can build their factories abroad the country that helps them to get cheap labor. Moreover, free trade is good, provided we have protections in place to make people feel sufficiently secure in a time of rapid economic change. This means health care and pension security that aren’t tied to a job that can suddenly disappear. It means broader trade adjustment assistance, job retraining, and wage insurance that keeps offshoring from being a disaster for affected families. On the other hand, Miller writes a disadvantage of free trade because some of the workers are lose their job and they lose their protections. For instance, the human job replaced by the reboot. So the United States policy maker should consider the dilemma and the benefit of free…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Loss of benefits: The benefits of free trade between countries in different blocs are lost.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Decline of the Union

    • 3539 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Scott, R. (2003). The High Price of ’Free’ Trade. Retrieved March 30, 2011 from http://www.epi.org/publications/entry/briefingpapers_bp147/…

    • 3539 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two benefits of free trade are how growing employment options and wages can help reduce social problems such as unemployment and poverty. Another benefit of free trade is how it helps secure a market for domestic producers and provides a cushion against other countries’ trade barriers. Two costs of free trade are factories and workers will go to countries will go to countries where it is cheaper and will cause unemployment to rise. The lower prices that usually are caused by free trade can make it very difficult for newer businesses to compete or to encourage new businesses in a certain…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In spite of the importance of free trade, some countries practice protectionism, imposing trade barriers on foreign goods and services in order to protect their domestic industries from foreign competition, in order to protect infant industries and achieve national objectives such as low unemployment and a stable domestic economy. This essay will explain these reasons that drive countries to practice protectionism.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays