Preview

Summary Of How Democratic Was The Roman Republic?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
379 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of How Democratic Was The Roman Republic?
In the Information articles, “How Democratic was the Roman Republic?” written by Alan Ward shows the Roman Empire could not be considered democratic because the rome citizens have no likelihood of being able to cast their vote regularly, but a group of unrepresentative voters can easily dominate sovereign popular institution. So wishes of the people as a whole are not expressed.

First, there were very practical barriers to fair and equitable voting in the popular assemblies. For instance, “ all voting had to be conduct in Rome.” ( From “How democratic was the Roman Republic?” written by Alan Ward) Once Roman territory has expanded, it was mostly the well-to-do rural voters and their clients who could afford time and expense to come to Rome
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roman Republic And US Politics: A Comparative Analysis
    • 82 Words
    • 1 Page

    Roman Republic And US Politics: A Comparative Analysis

    Comparing and contrasting the final turbulent between the Roman republic and U.S. politics were both controlling land outside of their borders, had the three branches of government, system of checks and balance with no branch of government being the strongest. Some of the differences were that Rome conquered control by subjection and the U.S. tires to include people into the nation. Every citizen that was born in the U.S. had natural rights, but in Rome you were just subjects and not citizens.…

    • 82 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Lucius Cornelius Sulla Lead To The End Of The Roman Republic?
    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Did Lucius Cornelius Sulla Lead To The End Of The Roman Republic?

    Lucius Cornelius Sulla was a well-known optimate Roman general who was able to become a consul twice and a dictator for an unlimited amount of time. While he was holding the position of dictator he got to change numerous laws and establish new ones with the purpose of restoring the law and order of Rome. However, opinions in Rome at this time after his death are divided between those that believe he did a good job and those that believe his actions will cause the end of the Roman republic. As a Roman citizen, I believe his actions will unravel the downfall of the Roman republic. For me, he started his careers with good intentions, but with time he finished it with “evil deeds.” I base my opinion on a series of factors such as the fact that…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    How Did Women Influence Political Events In Rome?
    • 2167 Words
    • 9 Pages

    How Did Women Influence Political Events In Rome?

    The ideal Roman woman’s role was exemplified by Cornelia Scipionis Africana, the loyal wife and mother who manages the household. Cornelia is known as the seamless example of a picture perfect woman: “It is reported that as Cornelia, their mother, bore the loss of her two sons with a noble and undaunted spirit” 9. She was famous for her dignified behaviour after her sons were murdered. This is the ideal political mother.…

    • 2167 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Cicero's Republic Of Rome: Source Analysis
    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Cicero's Republic Of Rome: Source Analysis

    Source 1 is a description of the Republic of Rome from Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 - 43 BC). Cicero was a writer and philosopher who is famous for his vast collection of private letters to various individuals, such as Titus Pomponius Atticus to whom he wrote to without fear about every day Rome and it's politics.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Sparta Change
    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages

    How Did Sparta Change

    As the age of the Greeks was coming to an end, a small kingdom in central Italy was gaining power and growing. During this time, Rome was not yet the Rome as we know it today. In 753 BCE the Kingdom of Rome was founded on a hill top right next to the Tiber River. This kingdom lasted for around 200 years until in 509 BCE when the people of Rome overthrew the king and created a republic. Like the Athenians, the Romans also showed pride in their participation in government. However unlike the Athenians the Romans set up a republic in which the people of Rome voted for representatives and those reps then discussed, voted and participated in the government. This in turn meant that political participation in Rome was less direct than it had been in their Greek counterparts but, this in no way stopped the Romans from participation in politics. The Romans believed in one very important virtue. This virtue was called gravitas and it represented the Roman’s seriousness and importance it put toward aspects of life, one of which was politics. The Romans felt that being involved in government was a civil duty that all Romans must know about it. The people of Rome felt this way because they did not want to revert back to the time when they were ruled by kings. Unfortunately the era of the republic began to fall as a cycle of violence ensued. Rome was in constant chaos at this time and as shown throughout…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Roman Republic and Literary Elements
    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Roman Republic and Literary Elements

    Honor, ambition, and tragic heroes. These are the literary elements that consist within both, “Antigone”, and, “Julius Caesar”. Both stories have similar conflicts that can relate one way or another. They contrast as well, with there being different conflicts. One where an ambitious ruler attempts to turn Rome into a monarchy, and another where a man who strives to be an overlord refuses to bury a fallen soldier. Both of the plays “Antigone”, and “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar”, have similarities and differences with the literary elements that they use.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Roman Republic Research Paper
    • 2567 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Roman Republic Research Paper

    The traditional dates for the Roman Republic are 509 to 27 B.C. The latter part of this period from 133 to 27 B.C. is known as the late Republic. It is also known as the Roman Revolution. The result of this revolution was the emergence of the Roman Empire and the catalyst has traditionally been linked to a single Roman citizen called Tiberius Gracchus. The wake of his brief political career left Rome much different than it had been. Like a crack in the wall of a dam, Tiberius revealed a weakness in the Roman system of government that would soon spider out of control until it could no longer hold back the deluge of the building political tension. What was this weakness?…

    • 2567 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Roman Government
    • 2157 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Roman Government

    What Influence did Gaius Julius Caesar and Augustus have on the reforms of the government from a Republic to an Empire?…

    • 2157 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Rome's Power In Central Italy
    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Rome's Power In Central Italy

    The success of the Romans started with their organization within the city. Almost all citizens could vote, and after plebeians were allowed to hold office, almost anybody could be appointed to the Senate and other governmental positions. Voting created a pride in the city, as every person held a stake in the city. It created a sprit that could be seen on the battlefield. Voting also allowed for merit…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How Democratic Was The Roman Republic
    • 165 Words
    • 1 Page

    How Democratic Was The Roman Republic

    The Roman Republic was rather democratic.The Romans were the start of a democracy, and we include many of their ideas today in the United States. They were democratic because they had a constitution two important elements including legislation, and the right for citizens to vote. The Romans still use the same concept as the government does nowadays, such as the magistrates, senate, and assemblies. The assemblies job was to pass legislation, which is the most important reason that Romans were democratic.…

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Democracy Is Incapable of Empire
    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Democracy Is Incapable of Empire

    The primary purpose of democratic government is of course to represent the will of the people in the form of the sovereign and its policies. In the quest for empire, however, this goal becomes difficult and potentially detrimental in the face of great political, economic, and social changes. Athens was a direct democracy, and Rome was a republic of a democratic and oligarchical mix, but the small and inefficient forms of statecraft of both civilizations were not equipped to effectively manage the empires both would become. The problem with democracy in empire is rooted in the issue that democracy itself seeks to answer – the issue of representation.…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ancient Athenian Democracy: Not True Democracy
    • 212 Words
    • 1 Page

    Ancient Athenian Democracy: Not True Democracy

    Ancient Athens was not truly democratic. First off, democracy is a system of government in which power is invested in the people who rule either directly or through freely elected represenative. An example of democracy; You have two treats, the dogs can pick only one treat to eat. I will let them both pick, and not only one. Democracy is equal. Ancient Athens wasn’t.…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roman Republic
    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Roman Republic

    In many ways, the Roman Republic was very similar to the way the United States government is organized today. There are three clear divisions of power Executive branch, Legislative branch, and judicial branch. The Executive branch elected by an assembly, they ruled as chief executives for one year. Consuls controlled the military as well. The Judicial branch has eight judges that were chosen by the century’s assembly to judge for a year. Two of the eight judges supervise civil court and criminal court. The legislative branch is 300 people ruled as Senate. They were chosen by aristocrats and they reigned over foreign affairs and financial policies. Century’s assembly: A group of citizen soldiers that are members for life. They elect consuls and make laws. Tribal assembly: Citizens are put into groups depending on where they live they are also members for life. Tribal assembly members elect tribunes. Legal code are The Twelve Tables was similar to the Bill of Rights the first ten amendments of the Constitution, however, it only protected the free-born male citizens under the law. The Roman government, though advanced for its time, was prone to corruption and instability. The Senate would usually have more power over the Executive branch and there was very little independence among the branches of government, which tended to be heavily influenced by dominant political faction. The United States distributes its power relatively evenly. Because each state has both local representatives, and representatives in Washington, it helps promote the interests of the people in way that Romans did not. The American Republic is a lot more evolved and refined then the Romans'…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Democracy: The Roman Republic
    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Democracy: The Roman Republic

    The Roman Republic, which was established in 510 BC after the defeat Etruscan conquerors, was in some ways an oligarchy. It was not a democracy as it is understood today. The Roman republic was ruled by a small group; consuls, and the Senate. To avoid trouble, none of these had absolute power. The Senate was a part of Roman aristocrats known as patricians or the wealthy upper class. They could oversee public funds and advise the Roman kings. They were from wealthy family and stayed in the position for life. The consuls were usually two magistrates elected by the patricians. They had the say on when to go to war or when to implement new laws. Both the consuls and the Senate worked hand in hand, although steadily over the years, the Senate gained more power. The Senate was the major body in the Republic. They swayed the decisions of the two consuls.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ancient Rome: The Representative Democracy
    • 53 Words
    • 1 Page

    Ancient Rome: The Representative Democracy

    The representative democracy started in in ancient Athens around 508 BCE and it wasn’t called representative democracy it was called direct democracy. Direct democracy lets the people make decisions and not the representatives. Ancient Rome started it, but the U.S. could be called a representative government because we elect representatives to make laws.…

    • 53 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics