Preview

Tripartite Theory of Knowledge

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1210 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Tripartite Theory of Knowledge
It’s arguably one of the greatest philosophical debates of all time; what does it mean to know? The Tripartite Theory is a model that tries to define individually necessary and jointly sufficient conditions to know a proposition. Edmund Gettier wrote a three page paper that philosophers to this day are still trying to debunk. This essay investigates how Gettier shows that the Tripartite Theory of Knowledge fails, which then leads to a discussion whether the theory can ever be fixed. Although some philosophers have tried to simply reject the Gettier cases, his counter examples have a great deal of strength and proved he could provide situations in which we lack knowledge, despite all the criteria being met.
It is generally accepted that the three conditions for us to possess knowledge is justified, true, belief. The first condition is belief. We cannot know unless we believe, even if it is true and we have great reasons to think it is true, we will only know it if we believe it. The second condition is truth. No matter how justified a belief, or how long it is believed, it cannot constitute knowledge if it turns out false. The third condition is justification. Lucky guesses don’t count, we can only know if we have a really good reason to believe.
The Tripartite Theory states; subject (s) knows proposition (p) if and only if (i) p is true, (ii) s believes that p and (iii) s’s belief that p is justified.
So in order to have propositional knowledge it actually has to be true, we need to believe it is true and our reasons need to be justified.
For example, as I write this essay I (s) know that its 20degrees outside (p). First of all, it is true, it is 20 degrees outside (i). I believe it is true (ii) and I am justified in my belief because I can see the temperature gauge outside showing 20 degrees, the radio weather channel mentioned it is 20 degrees outside today and it just feels like 20 degrees outside to me (iii). Due to the Tripartite Theory,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Justification. The person’s belief that p needs to be well supported, such as by being based upon some good evidence or reasoning, or perhaps some other kind of rational justification. Otherwise, the belief, even if it is true, may as well be a lucky guess. It would be correct without being knowledge. It would only be something else, something…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Geometry module 1.01

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Theorem- information that seem true but must be proven (like solving a mystery) using the postulates.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Then one can cause such an assertion to be conveyed to some party who can then rely on…

    • 2032 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Epistemology Phil/201 Quiz

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A group of theories of justification which holds that one does need to have access to evidence to be justified or warranted about at least some beliefs; I may not know why I know, but I can still reasonably say I know.…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Knowledge goes beyond my personal feelings on the matter and involves the truth of things as they actually are. Truth is an indispensable component of knowledge. In this case James did get the right guess so his argument does satisfy the truth condition. Second, one must believe the statement in order to know it. For example, it's true that Elvis Presley is dead, and there is enormous evidence to back this up. But if one still believes that he is alive, he couldn't sincerely say that he knows that Elvis is dead. Part of the concept of knowledge involves our personal belief convictions about some fact, irrespective of what the truth of the matter is. In our case James does truly believe in his statement, so the belief condition is also met. Last is the justified requirement, one must be justified in believing the statement insofar as there must be good evidence in…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Phl458 Week 1

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Knowledge is what we know to be true, what we understand as fact about a subject. "We can obtain authentic knowledge in any one of three ways: personal experience, observation, and report from others" (Ruggiero, 2019, p. 30).…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Week 2 3 4 matrix

    • 603 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The study of knowledge: What constitutes knowledge, the nature of knowledge, and whether knowledge is possible?…

    • 603 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Donovan Implications

    • 2251 Words
    • 10 Pages

    We laugh about the person who says, ‘I know I’m right; don’t confuse me with arguments’. And yet there are times when we find ourselves wanting to say that too. For there are situations in which we feel sure that we know something, even though if asked to give a good argument to back up our claim we are at a loss to know quite how to do so. ‘I know you’re the person I spoke to on the bus yesterday.’ ‘I know I have two hands.’ ‘I know it is wrong to let that child starve.’ ‘I know that six minus four leaves two.’ Our experience of being confident that we are right in cases like those is often called intuition. Intuitive knowing seems to be a direct, convincing way of knowing, which needs no further argument. And it is a perfectly ordinary, everyday occurrence as those examples show.…

    • 2251 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The point of this paper is to show what the Knowledge Argument is, the two premises it contains, and its conclusion. Also I will explain one objection it holds. Lastly, I will explain how the objection fails to succeed its point in contradicting the Knowledge Argument. The Knowledge Argument proposed by Frank Jackson is about Mary, a scientist that is brilliant and understands and knows everything about neural science and physics. This takes place in the future where she is held in a black and white room where all she ever sees is black and white.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    valid conclusion, it is not necessarily knowledge as its success is unpredictable. This is conveyed…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    essay

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Gettier came up with two counterexamples to argue that there can exist a case that beliefs can both be true and justified, but that do not show to have any true cases of knowledge. In his first case his counterexample he used the example of a man named smith has applied for a job, but, it is claimed, has a justified belief that Jones will get the job. A justified belief that Jones has ten coins in his pocket was in it too. Smith then with this information, came to that conclusion that the man that had the ten coins in his pocket would be the one that would be rewarded with the job. To find out though, Jones did not get the job. On the contrary, Smith got it. Smith, probably not knowing it would happen, also obtained ten coins in his pockets at the time. The belief that the man who obtained…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ladder of Inference

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages

    t is vital in any group and/or organization to establish and maintain a reliable exchange of valid and verifiable information about important problems and issues. This requires the ability to discriminate among four types of information: description, inference, attribution, and evaluation. A description is a (hopefully objective and reasonably accurate) report or account of an experience or observation. An inference is a conclusion derived from beliefs or what are thought to be facts. An attribution is an ascribed, inferred, or assumed cause, characteristic, or motive of another person. An evaluation is a determination or judgement about the value or "goodness" of a statement or action by another person. The Ladder of Inference Model is a very useful tool for helping individuals become more aware of and discriminate among these four very different types of information and their use in communication.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Truth Definition Essay

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Let’s take the example of history. Is everything we read about fact? How much of what we read in our History textbooks is actually the author’s perception of the truth. Let’s take the example of various…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theories of Human Nature

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The first of the five theories is rationality, and simply states that one uses knowledge with the process of thought to draw a conclusion. If a dog’s bowl full of food in the morning, but later in the afternoon it has become empty. One could rationally draw the conclusion that the dog could have eaten all the food out of the bowl.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although distinctions similar to Kant’s a priori–a posteriori distinction and his synthetic–analytic distinction have been made by thinkers such as Hume and Leibniz, Kant is the first to apply two such distinctions to generate a third category for knowledge. Hume, for instance, does not distinguish between what Kant calls the analytic and the a priori and what he calls the synthetic and the a posteriori, so that, for Hume, all synthetic judgments are necessarily a posteriori. Since only a priori truths have the important qualities of being universal and necessary, all general truths about reality—as opposed to particular observations about unconnected events—must be a priori. If our a priori knowledge is limited to definitional analytic judgments, then Hume is right in concluding that rationally justified knowledge of universal and necessary truths is impossible. Kant’s coup comes in determining that synthetic judgments can also be a priori. He shows that mathematics and scientific principles are neither analytic nor a posteriori, and he provides an explanation for the category of the synthetic a priori by arguing that our mental faculties shape our…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics