I do not find any of the traditional proofs for God’s existence persuasive‚ and I will go over each argument one at a time to explain why I do not find them persuasive‚ starting with Anselm’s ontological argument‚ then Aquinas’ cosmological argument‚ and finally Paley’s teleological argument. First‚ Anselm’s ontological argument is not persuasive because the argument can be used to prove things that do not exist. The faulty logic is shown in Gaunilo’s Lost Island Objection because instead of putting
Premium
has put a cap on the true and full meaning of diversity. Having a diverse organization goes deeper than the ethnic make up of the employees. This paper will discuss the diversity action plan for the Google Corporation. This paper will discuss the history of the company and its diversity‚ the meaning of diversity and an action plan of diversity. What is Google? Can it be found in a dictionary? Google is a web site that many people use every day to search for anything that his or her heart desires. More
Premium Google Google search
argue that an approach to corporate social responsibility that achieves business benefits is nothing of that sort - THAT’s just good business. So CSR must be only those things that are of no direct benefit to the business - ie. philanthropy. Cue the arguments about how CEOs should not be giving shareholders money away on their personal causes and projects. This is just dumb. Nobody says that marketing is not marketing if it benefits the business‚ or HR is not ’pure’ HR if its priorities align with
Premium Management Corporate social responsibility Social responsibility
Glaucon’s Argument In Book 2 of the Republic‚ Glaucon is passionate about finding the true meaning of what justice is. To do this he decides to praise injustice in the purest way so that Socrates will refute it and give him the meaning of justice in its purest form. Glaucon approaches the situation by discussing the following three points: the “kind of thing people consider justice to be and what its origins are”‚ “that all who practice it do so unwillingly‚ as something necessary‚ not as something
Premium Plato Justice Law
Literature Review: Autoethnography and Action Research Introduction Within this literature review two emerging research methodologies will be discussed: Action research and autoethnography. Each of these methodologies has their own purposes‚ powers and strengths and both differ from other traditional forms of academic research. To gain an understanding of these methodologies‚ 16 pieces of empirical research have been used. Although two articles are dated back to the 1990s‚ the majority of research
Premium Scientific method Research
says "This argument is fallacious you all blame God for the bad things in life when really it’s people because God gave us free will" and then several atheists begin to bicker and argue with him over who is right and wrong for literally an hour straight before I even read any of it but they totally miss the point this dude is so full of himself for having used all these big words and was so sure he was so much smarter than everyone in that forum until I hit him with this: "Your argument was flawed
Premium God Religion Existence
the ultimate sources of our actions are within our control. As such‚ we are held morally responsible. Determinism is the thesis that all events in the future are causally determined by previous events‚ in conjunction with the laws of nature. Compatibilism is the thesis that we can have free will in a deterministic world. However‚ if we are part of a world in which the causal chain of our actions extends back to before we were born‚ this erodes the notion that our actions are sufficiently free to make
Premium Free will Determinism Causality
state are entitled to have freedom of action. This means that these individuals have the right to engage in any action that they want‚ regardless of if it is harmful to them or not‚ this is one of the definitions for Mill’s harm principle. These actions can be known as self-regarding and other regarding actions‚ a self regarding action is known to be an action which only affects the involved persons‚ whereas other regarding actions are defined as any action which causes harm to others (Garner‚ Ferdinand
Premium Individual rights Sociology Homosexuality
explain that Socrates argument and show how depends on how what the unjust causes. Then I will argue that this assumption is to be questioned under the fact that citizens are not necessarily affected by the law breakers‚ and that by doing something unjust can be moral. In the Crito‚ the question that Socrates is getting Crito to answers is “Would fellow Citizens be harmed by breaking the law.” Crito proposes Socrates a plan to escape prison. Socrates listens to each argument debating whether they
Premium Plato Law
insinuating that Socrates has had much time to ponder his sentence and escape‚ as well as the result of further action. Crito eagerly attempts persuading Socrates to escape by presenting many gripping arguments. Socrates responds to these arguments by asking/interrogating Crito with questions surrounding pressing life principles that both men agree on and by doing so provides an argument against Crito’s encouragements of escape. No Athenian law prevents any Athenian from leaving‚ and the laws
Premium Plato Socrates Philosophy