Michael Anthony L. Leachon Obligation and Contracts Case Digests PNB VS CA 315 SCRA 309 FACTS: * October 23‚ 1990 Lily S. Pujol opened an account with the petitioner PNB(Mandaluyong branch.) She applied for a “combo account” under her business name “Pujol Trading.” This account is a combination of a savings and current account wherein if there are insufficient funds in the current account of the owner then the funds of the savings fund will be used. PNB thereafter‚ issued a passbook with
Premium Contract Money Trial court
prepared already and the visitors were there‚ he agreed to solemnize the marriage. He reminded them that marriage won’t be valid without the license. They promised to give it within the day but they never did. Arañes desisted but Court still decided the case. ISSUE: Whether or not the marriage is valid? HELD: No. Judge fined P5‚000.00. RATIO: 1. Judges can only solemnize marriage within their territorial jurisdiction. 2. Marriage license is a requisite for marriage and without it‚ marriage is void
Premium Marriage Psychology Family therapy
different manner. Most of the men treat her in a negative way‚ therefore causing different degrees of sympathy from the reader. Sympathy implies that the reader feels an emotional connection towards the character. Her unhappy marriage to the boss’s son causes her great loneliness and unhappiness as she tries‚ in vain‚ to find someone to talk to on the ranch. The reader may feel certain degrees of sympathy for Curleys wife due to the fact that the ranch workers are always talking
Premium Of Mice and Men John Steinbeck
Pearsall v. Alexander This case involves a consideration which is the inducement to make a contract enforceable. Pearsall and Alexander had an agreement to share to proceeds. But when Alexander had a $20‚000 winning ticket‚ he refused to give Pearsall anything‚ which led Pearsall to sue Alexander for a breach of an agreement. Court ruled in favor of Pearsall‚ and Alexander must share the winnings enforced by valid agreement. I think Court was right on the decision based on a fact that they always
Premium Law Contract United States
crew were saved. - On November 3‚ 1980‚ the captain of M/V P. Aboitiz filed his “Marine Protest”‚ stating that the wind force was at 10 to 15 knots at the time the ship foundered and described the weather as “moderate breeze‚ small waves‚ becoming longer‚ fairly frequent white horse - Petitioner notified the consignee of the total loss of the vessel and all of its cargoes. - General Textile‚ lodged a claim with respondent for the amount of its loss. - Respondent paid General Textile and was subrogated
Premium Insurance
U. S. vs Rivera GR No. 16443 March 21‚ 1921 FACTS: When Leona Laciste endeavored to set fire to the house of Martina Rivera in which 2 children of the latter were sleeping‚ the two women grappled and Leona Laciste was boloed to death by Martina Rivera. As a result‚ a criminal prosecution for murder was initiated in the Court of First Instance on La Union. DECISION OF THE LOWER COURT: Guilty of Homicide. ISSUE: Whether or not Martina Rivera is guilty of homicide. DECISION OF THE APPELLATE
Premium Trial court Criminal law Appeal
J.: On 2 October 1985‚ petitioner San Miguel Village School filed a complaint for breach of contract with damages against respondent Christina Triño‚ before the Regional Trial Court‚ Branch 3‚ Lanao del Norte‚ the complaint being docketed as Civil Case No. L-111-577. A Certificate to File Action‚ signed by the Barangay Captain of Barangay Palao‚ Iligan City‚ dated 17 September 1985‚ bearing the notation that the "respondent cannot be contacted‚" was filed along with the complaint. Summons was served
Premium 1923
Cargill vs. Intra Strata Assurance Corporation; March 15‚ 2010 Issues: 1.Whether petitioner is doing or transacting business in the Philippines in contemplation of the law and established jurisprudence; 2.Whether respondent is estopped from invoking the defense that petitioner has no legal capacity to sue in the Philippines; Facts: Petitioner Cargill‚ Inc. (petitioner) is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware‚ United States of America. Petitioner and Northern
Premium Corporation Jurisdiction Legal terms
G.R. No. 171118 In cases when an employee is unjustly dismissed from work‚ he shall be entitled to reinstatement without loss of seniority rights and other privileges‚ inclusive of allowances‚ and other benefits or their monetary equivalent from the time the compensation was withheld up to the time of actual reinstatement. The awards of moral damages and exemplary damages are also in order and grant of attorney’s fees is likewise proper. ISSUES: 1. WON the respondents were validly dismissed
Premium Legal terms Employment Pleading
FLORES vs. COMELEC Case Digest FLORES vs. COMELEC 184 SCRA 484 Facts: Petitioner Roque Flores was declared by the board of canvassers as having the highest number of votes for kagawad on the March 1989 elections‚ in Barangay Poblacion‚ Tayum‚ Abra‚ and thus proclaimed punong barangay in accordance with Section 5 of R.A. 6679. However‚ his election was protested by private respondent Rapisora‚ who placed secondin the election with one vote less than the petitioner. The Municipal CircuitTrial
Premium Court Appeal