Preview

• Explain The Hypothesis Of Which The Research Rests (1-2 Sentence

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1469 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
• Explain The Hypothesis Of Which The Research Rests (1-2 Sentence
1. What is the title of the reading? Who conducted the research? (1-2 sentences)
Answer: The title of the reading is “Social Psychology.” The research was conducted by Philip Zimbardo (286).
2. Provide a brief summary of background information in the field which led up to the study and the reasons that the researcher carried out this particular project (1 paragraph).
Answer: Social psychology is the branch of psychology that looks at how your behavior is influenced by others and how their behavior is influenced by yours. It is the study of human interactions and covers a wide array of topics like: romantic relationships, group behavior, prejudice, discrimination, and aggression. Because humans spending almost every waking hour interacting with others in some variation, social psychology contains the greatest number of studies. The Philip Zimbardo experiment provided new insights into some extreme human social behavior, sparked new waves of research to either confirm, refine, or contest theories, and created heated controversy about research ethics (286)
3. Explain the hypothesis of which the research rests (1 sentence)
Answer: The goal of the study was to
…show more content…
To ensure informed consent, volunteers were told general information pertaining to the study such as the violation of personal privacy, civil rights, and minimal food (nutritional needs would be met.) After extensive screening for psychological problems and background checks were completed, “twenty-four normal college-age men were selected” to compete in the experiment (289). Then at random, the volunteers were split into two groups of “prisoners” and “guards.” Zimbardo's goals here was to separate personality factors from the influence on the situation in determining behavior

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In discussions of the Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Philip G. Zimbardo in 1970, one controversial issue has been whether or not the experiment should have ever been attempted. On the one hand, Dr. Zimbardo and his colleagues argued that the experiment gave them a deeper understanding of human suffering and a greater empathy for their fellow man (Ratnesar 2011). On the other hand, one of the former guards contended that the experiment made him more hostile and less sympathetic during his time as a guard and that the circumstances significantly altered his perception of what was appropriate behavior. Others even maintain that the prison experiment degraded the prisoners so greatly, empowered the guards to such a great extent, and even affected Dr. Zimbardo’s behavior and mannerisms so dramatically that it thoroughly altered their sense of…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A team at Stanford University, led by Phillip Zimbardo, conducted the Stanford Prison Experiment to investigate causes of conflict between military guards and prisoners. Zimbardo and his team were seeking to observe the inherent personality traits of prisoners and guards and see if this was the chief cause of abusive behavior in these settings (Haney, Banks, and Zimbardo, 1973). This study is one that is well know and well-recognized. Zimbardo and his study are often discussed in many psychology courses today, and have even caused reform in prison systems as well as IRB/APA ethical committees.…

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Social psychology- a branch of psychology that studies society and people’s interactions with each other.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Project part 1

    • 1134 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The way we perceive ourselves in relation to the rest of the world plays an important role in our choices, behaviors and beliefs. Conversely, the opinions of others also impact our behavior and the way we view ourselves. Social psychologists investigate how people view themselves and others, how they interact with and influence others, and how people act when part of a group. Given the amount of time spent thinking about and interacting with other people, it follows that much of our lives are spent with the subject matter of social psychology.…

    • 1134 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Psyc221 Notes

    • 6651 Words
    • 27 Pages

    * Social Psychology-branch of psychology that seeks an understanding of how people affect and are affected by others.…

    • 6651 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The test aimed to show that the inherent personality traits of prisoners and guards are the chief cause of abusive behavior in prison. Zimbardo and his selected team with funding from the US Office of Naval Research selected twenty-four predominately “healthy” white middle class males for the experiment. The subjects were selected through extensive background and psychological tests excluding those with criminal backgrounds, psychological impairments, and health problems. The length of the experiment was supposed to be two weeks, but was ended after only six days due to ethical issues. These ethical issues prompted many debates of whether or not the experiment was ethical or not.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philip Zimbardo’s infamous study: the Stanford Prison Experiment is another positive example of circumstantial determinants overriding personality. The Stanford Prison Experiment is an experiment designed to determine the effect of a medley of situational variables on the behavior of subjects roleplaying prisoners and guards in a simulated prison environment. In his subsequent novel, The Lucifer Effect, Zimbardo stated that originally, the experiment intended to discern “what people bring into a prison situation from what the situation brings out in the people who are there” (Philip Zimbardo). The participants, representative of educated youth belonging to the middle class, were arrested from their homes with no previous warning on Sunday, August 14th 1971. Upon arrival at the constructed prison simulation at Stanford University they were randomly assigned into…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 1971 Philipp Zimbardo carried out one of the most ethically controversial psychological experiment the ‘Stanford Prison Experiment’. Originally he aimed to study how much our behavior is structured by the social role we occupy. Describing the study briefly 24 undergraduates with no criminal and psychological record were chosen for the research to play the roles of prisoners and guards in a mock prison situated in the basement of Stanford University Psychology Building, equipped by hidden cameras and microphones. As the lead researcher, Zimbardo was observing the events from a different room, giving instructions to the guards. The research was supposed to last about two weeks. However, aggressive and violent behavior quickly appeared on the behalf of the group playing the role of the guards, while prisoners became depressed and passive. Ultimately some of the prisoners were subject to torture. Since the participants assimilated with their role rapidly and provided surprising psychological outcome, Dr Zimbardo shot down the research after 5 days. The experiment meant to demonstrate the power of authority, support of the situational attribution of behavior rather than the dispositional attribution. For forty years it was criticized as well as argued when it came to the relation of ethics and psychology. If it would be carried out today it would fail to meet the Ethical Principals of the Psychologist and Code of Conduct of the American Psychological Association. This paper will discuss the main unethical elements of the Stanford Prison Experiment, such as the violation of privacy and confidentiality, physical and mental harm during an experiment and the researcher’s involvement of the warden role.…

    • 2166 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Read the material on Milgram & Zimbardo and explain which study is the most useful in understanding human behaviour in a social situation (focusing on the methods used and findings obtained) and which study is the most unethical.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this experiment, Professor Zimbardo and his subordinates chose the twenty-four of the most psychologically stable and healthy candidates from over seventy-five undergraduates. The randomly assigned prisoners were then arrested at their homes and processed with the help of local police, getting their mug shots taken, fingerprinted, and issued prison uniforms before being confined to a cell in a Stanford University basement. Those who were assigned prison guard duty were issued guard uniforms and instructed in how to treat the “prisoners”. The “guards” were also issued the wooden police batons as authority symbols and visible threats of physical injury to prisoners, and also wore mirrored sunglasses to prevent prisoner eye contact and add to the depersonalization of the mock prison. The second day of the experiment, the “prisoners” rioted, prompting the prison “guards” to break up the riot by attacking the prisoners with fire extinguishers without the supervision of the research staff. After thirty-six hours, “Prisoner 8612” went into a hysterical rage, and was only released after his suffering was apparent to the researchers. His release started a false rumor of a “prison break”, and the guards dismantled the prison to build in a more “secure” location. People would believe the experiment would be ended at that point, especially since the subjects involved were Stanford undergraduates under the supervision of a respectable university professor. They do not understand that when human beings become too involved in their roles or their society, they become what they and everyone else are acting as, creating a new identity to fit in, rather than fight the system to make it…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    To set up the experiment, Zimbardo placed an ad in the paper asking for young, white, males, college aged to participate in a study for $15/a day and secured some space on campus to use as a makeshift prison, including cells and a guard break room. Twelve students were selected Out of 75 respondents, 12 students were selected to be ‘prisoners’ in the Stanford psychology building. Twelve others were selected to play the role of ‘guards.’ The roles were all randomly assigned.…

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Psychology Analysis

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Social Psychology: the branch of psychology that deals with social interactions, including their origins and their effects on the individual.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    psych

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1. Social psychology: the study of how people's thoughts, feelings, and behavior influence, and are influenced by, the behavior of others…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    A Stimulated Prison Study

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Leading to claims that the studies influence on psychology and society in general, comes from the fact Zimbardo made unsubstantiated assertions about human behaviour. In particular, the way that cohorts of people react to social situations (Haslam, & Redner, 2006). Invited to comment on Haslam and Redner's partial replication of his study Zimbardo agreed, to bring attention to, “why I believe this alleged 'social psychology field research is fraudulent and does not merit acceptance by the social psychological community” (Zimbardo, 2006). Throughout the paper, Zimbardo…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to psychologist Gordon Allport, social psychology is a discipline that uses scientific methods "to understand and explain how the thought, feeling and behavior of individuals are influenced by the actual, imagined or implied presence of other human beings" (1985). Social psychology looks at a wide range of social topics, including group behavior, social perception, leadership, nonverbal behavior, conformity, aggression, and prejudice. It is important to note that social psychology is not just about looking at social influences. Social perception and social interaction are also vital to understanding social behavior.…

    • 783 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays