According to the Lord Woolf report 1996, the civil justice system was slow, complicated and money consuming. Therefore, the civil procedure rules were introduced to aim for a more accessible, fair, efficient and straightforward civil justice system. They replaced the previously existing rules of the Supreme Court and county court and contain the reforms put forward by Lord Woolf (Insolvency direct, 2018).
To make sure that you deal with the case in a swift manner, to enable parties to be on a equal level it is important to apply all of the …show more content…
Currently there are reform set out following the Courts reform act to ensure that court cases are dealt with swiftly and more efficiently at an appropriate rate. This means that there are reform in place to ensure that justice is achieved currently as well as in the future. ADR is much quicker and far less costly than litigation. Also unlike the court process which is open to the public, ADR is done confidentially; only including the individuals involved which is far more reassuring and comfortable. Alternative dispute resolution in general is a lot more advantageous than other methods as it is faster, more flexible, more responsive to individuals needs, more informal, less costly and the individuals involved tend to be more compliant as they are more committed. These facts also state that ADR is a great way to achieve justice as it makes it more of a comfortable environment so that individuals can open up more and discuss their issue openly (in brief, 2018) (Law handbook,