Preview

• Explain The Purpose Of The Civil Court Process

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1770 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
• Explain The Purpose Of The Civil Court Process
In this assignment I will explain the purpose of the civil court process and explain the reasons why people would consider the alternative dispute resolution process and if justice can be achieved through both routes.
According to the Lord Woolf report 1996, the civil justice system was slow, complicated and money consuming. Therefore, the civil procedure rules were introduced to aim for a more accessible, fair, efficient and straightforward civil justice system. They replaced the previously existing rules of the Supreme Court and county court and contain the reforms put forward by Lord Woolf (Insolvency direct, 2018).
To make sure that you deal with the case in a swift manner, to enable parties to be on a equal level it is important to apply all of the
…show more content…
Currently there are reform set out following the Courts reform act to ensure that court cases are dealt with swiftly and more efficiently at an appropriate rate. This means that there are reform in place to ensure that justice is achieved currently as well as in the future. ADR is much quicker and far less costly than litigation. Also unlike the court process which is open to the public, ADR is done confidentially; only including the individuals involved which is far more reassuring and comfortable. Alternative dispute resolution in general is a lot more advantageous than other methods as it is faster, more flexible, more responsive to individuals needs, more informal, less costly and the individuals involved tend to be more compliant as they are more committed. These facts also state that ADR is a great way to achieve justice as it makes it more of a comfortable environment so that individuals can open up more and discuss their issue openly (in brief, 2018) (Law handbook,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    What is ADR? ADR Approaches of Arguments Resolution Negotiation Why Negotiation? Proceedings Implication…

    • 397 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bus Law 531 Week 1

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) over the years has grown in popularity with over 90% of all cases resolved through some form of ADR. The advantages of ADR over trial include such things, as it is less formal and less intimidating. ADR has a more rapid resolution and is less expensive and is normally heard by an arbitrator or mediator. ADR enables parties to address underlying issues and interests. It permits more creative and flexible solutions. Trial by comparison is a more formal process. Traditional litigation requires that a complaint is filed in the court and the plaintiff most respond. This is followed by a pre-trial and a trial in which each party is allowed to present their case and it is settled either by jury or a judge. Trials are also a slower process and require a higher amount of time, more expensive, and as well as stress and emotional disarray. In traditional litigation businesses may get certain documents, testimony, and other evidence, which may not apply to ADR…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law/531 Adr Analysis

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The benefit of ADR, allows a legal issue to be resolved without having to spend as much money and time as a traditional means. Arbitration, collaborative law, mediation and negotiation are a few of the alternative means to resolve disputes. For the majority of the ADR process, there is no need for a judge or jury. Initially, an ADR method should be chosen, with a neutral individual in charge of facilitation. For the benefit of avoiding a public trial, a…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ADR can save vast amounts of time and money. While lawsuits can take years and thousands of dollars to settle, through ADR, conflicts can often be resolved in a matter of weeks or months at a greatly reduced cost. There are potential savings in court costs, attorney fees, and expert witness fees when a dispute is settled through mediation, arbitration, or a combination of both. Potential disadvantages of ADR are the wasted time and increased cost that are incurred when a dispute goes through ADR but still ends up in court.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    While courts provide an essential service to our society, there are times when taking an issue before a court is not the best option. Litigation can be costly and time consuming; which is why Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) has become a valued form of handling legal matters, as it can help resolve a case more quickly and economically (Alford & Kaufman, 1999). Understanding ADR involves recognizing its purpose, looking to see how it can be applied in a situation, and supporting and understanding the provisions for which an ADR can effectively take place.…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is an important aspect of the court’s structure in that it allows disputes to be resolved without the need for litigation. The different types of this key alternative will be discussed along with a pros and cons of each alternative type. A personal perspective of how ADR has worked for me in the past will be included as well as what type was used.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Texas has many disputes that can be federal or state cases, and this memo will provide an exclusive analysis regarding how a civil action case in the state court system went through the legal stages and other ADR or alternative methods of dispute resolution methods. This memo will not be complete without providing the differences of cost and benefits between using ADR versus a traditional litigation.…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) offers all the advantages of the federal judicial system and then some. Along with fixed rules and the possibility of appeal, it allows for speed, confidentiality, cost efficiency, customized resolutions, and enforceability. These make ADR a good arbitration option for a whole range of complex commercial cases like securities, professional malpractice, patent litigation, personal injury litigation and bankruptcy mediation.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Litigation Law 531

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Disputes are settled by various means every day. This paper will consider the process of traditional litigation and alternative dispute resolution in settling those disputes. Knowing the advantages and disadvantages is important when deciding what process to employ in settling a dispute.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Alternative Dispute Resolution ("ADR") refers to any means of settling disputes outside of the courtroom. ADR typically includes early neutral evaluation, negotiation, conciliation, mediation, and arbitration. As burgeoning court queues, rising costs of litigation, and time delays continue to plague litigants, more states have begun experimenting with ADR programs. Some of these programs are voluntary; others are mandatory.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Team Paper

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The objectives for week one was to understand the major components of the legal system and differentiate between legal forms of business. The other objective was to obtain a thorough understanding of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) including advantages and disadvantages. Team B has collaborated on the discussion questions listed below and will reveal the team’s findings and opinions throughout this paper.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Miss

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the adversary system of trial each party is in control and responsible for presenting their own case, with this comes great problems and strength to the case itself. A strength that is attached to the parties having control is that the truth is more likely to emerge, due to each party being empowered to present the strongest evidence and arguments to win their case. Having parties in control of preparing and presenting their case should increase party satisfaction with the legal system and the resolution achieved. However in attempt to win a case, parties may deliberately tamper or omit evidence that may impede the discovery of the truth. Furthermore a party with no or equivalent legal experience will be disadvantaged making it harder for the adversary system to reach a fair and unbiased hearing.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the United States, a traditional litigation refers to the process of bringing, defending and maintaining a lawsuit (Cheeseman, 2010). Traditional litigation goes through a structured process of answer, discovery trial and jury. Whereas the nontraditional litigation process, alternative dispute resolution, known as ADR is a more flexible, less expensive, not as time consuming, and confidential process. There are several forms of alternative dispute resolution, mediation, arbitration, negotiation, conciliation, mini-trial, fact-finding and utilizing a judicial referee. Arbitration and mediation are similar to where it is a form of negotiation and a neutral party settles the dispute. Negotiation is where the two parties negotiate to settle the dispute. A mini-trial is a shortened version of a traditional litigation trial. Fact-finding situations call for the parties to employ a third party to investigate the facts to come to a resolution. Lastly, a judicial referee is much like a mini-trial but both parties reserve the right to appeal. Ninety percent of cases are resolved through alternative dispute resolution (Harms, 2011). The next several paragraphs will identify risks associated with traditional litigation and the advantages of the alternative dispute resolution in reducing those risks.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Law Evaluation

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Certain rights to counsel and due process safeguards are suitable to any process more critical to an adversarial or…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    J. Braithwaite writes, "Court-annexed ADR (alternative dispute resolution) and restorative justice could not be philosophically further apart", because the former seeks to address only legally relevant issues and to protect both parties' rights, whereas restorative justice seeks "expanding the issues beyond those that are legally relevant, especially into underlying relationships."[8]…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics