Preview

"12 Angrey Men" is a movie that has may social psychological concepts occuring through out.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
653 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
"12 Angrey Men" is a movie that has may social psychological concepts occuring through out.
12 Angry Men is a movie that involves a murder case. A young male is on trial for the murder of his father. The gentleman's life is in the hands of twelve jurors. The jurors sat in court and listened to both sides of the case. They were then locked in a sixteen by twenty-four foot jury room to decide if they want to sentence this man to death. Inside of the locked room, they argued for hours on end to come to a conclusion. Throughout the movie many social psychological concepts occur.

One of the social psychological concepts is compliance. Compliance is conformity that involves publicly action in accord with social pressure while privately disagreeing. People comply to avoid punishment. While in the locked room a vote was taken to start things off. The votes were spoken out loud and counted. While going in order, 'guilty', 'guilty', 'guilty', then a hesitant 'guilty'. The juror that hesitated to say guilty, only agreed with the others so he could avoid social punishment, disliking. He only said guilty to comply with the rest of the group. What would happen to him if he disagreed? He had no choice but to agree, unless he wanted to face the rest of the jurors.

Another concept is the overconfidence phenomenon. This is the tendency to be more confident than correct. You can see this take place if you follow one man's path in this movie. He is confident the young man is guilty. Even when he is confronted with theories that the young and may have not committed the crime, he still believes he is correct. Every juror is convinced that he was not guilty, because of reason of doubt, except for one. No matter how much evidence was presented to this man he still is confident the young man committed the crime. The juror is overconfident he is right and overestimated the accuracy of his beliefs.

A third social psychological concept that occurred in this movie is stereotyping. When the jurors were in the locked room, some of them kept referring to the young male as 'one of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    12 Angry Men: Overview

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1. Each Act takes happens in the same place. The entire play takes place in the jury room of a New York City court of law in 1957 during a very hot summer afternoon. It is a large, dull, minimalistic room with three windows in the brick wall which the skyline of New York City can be seen. There is also a wash room and lavatory off the jury room. There is a large, scarred table in the centre with twelve chairs around it. There are pencils pads and an ashtray on the table. There is also a water cooler in the room with plastic cups. The dullness of the room may signify and provide a mood for the act and is evident in the interactions between the jurors. The Twelve jurors are all seemingly awkward and uneasy towards each other once they enter the room.…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eyewitness In 12 Angry Men

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Normative conformity is when a group of people is pressure due to a person wanting to fit in the group. An example of this is Asch line study. Informative conformity is when a person is not clear of the situation and compares their behavior with the group. An example of this is sheriff’s study.There was indication that conformity played a role in the jury’s decision. One of the jurors at first did not have a lot to say and seem indecisive as to whether or not the boy was guilty. He definitely had some doubts, but went along with the rest of the jurors because of all the pressure. The eldest juror votes but later changes his mind suggesting he went along with the rest of the jurors. Compare to another juror who also went with the other jurors’ opinions of voting not guilty. When they found the boy guilty, he also voted guilty but when the jurors changes to not guilty his mind changes to not guilty as well. However, he changed his plea for superficial reason so he conformed more because of normative influence. He did not believe the boy was guilty at…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He also accustomed to forcing his wishes and views upon others (1). Therefore, during the developing of the voting, Juror Three try to force people to admit his prejudice continuously. If people do not agree his view and vote for not guilty, he is angry and interrupt other Jurors’ discussion. Even though other jurors support appropriate assumption and evidence to prove the murder is not guilty, Juror Three do not believe and keep his prejudice which has logical fallacies. For example, when Juror Nine change his vote in the second voting for not guilty, and want to explain the reason why he change his mind, Juror Three answers, “No, we wouldn’t like to know why”(12). When Juror Eight try to measure how long the old man can walk in 15 minutes, and walk as slowly as the old man who uses canes. However, Juror Three says, “You made it sound like a long walk. It’s not,” (19) and when Juror Eleven thinks Juror Eight’s behavior can be an important point. Juror Three declares, “It’s a ridiculous waste of time”…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    in the inner workings of the human mind. Throughout the film, the audience witnesses the roles that…

    • 1630 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reginald Rose’s play, Twelve Angry Men, is about a jury’s decision making process in a murder trial. The facts in this play become blinded by the prejudices that some Juror’s possess. A prejudice jury became formed due to a biased testimony and the facts became clouded as generalisations were formed by the Juror’s. Some Juror’s bigotry can be based on their past experiences and discrimination didn’t only happen to the defendant, but it was also experienced by Juror’s themselves…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Set in the sweltering summer of 1954, Reginald Rose's socially insightful play "Twelve Angry Men", illustrates the dangers of a justice system that relies on twelve individuals to reach a "life or death" decision with collective states of minds hindered by "personal prejudice". At the conception of the play, rose explores the idea that doubt is a harder state of mind than certainty by portraying doubt, in the guilt of the boy, as a minority view within the courtroom. However, as the play progresses a seed of doubt is planted and the importance of self prejudice hindering the verdict is removed, making it harder for the jurors to hold their certainty in their guilty verdict.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Of 12 Angry Men

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For fans of courtroom dramas and crime television, these court case movies all revolve around the courtroom. Unlike the orderly process of a real courtroom, the stories are filled with drama, intrigue and corruption. Getting to the truth is seldom as straightforward as it appears within these hit movies.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    12 Angry Men Jury Duty

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Psychologist Solomon Asch defines conformity as the changing of beliefs due to either the real or the imagined pressures exerted on an individual by the ones around them. Normative and informational influences are two ways that convinced the jurors’ 7 and 4 to conform. Normative influence is defined as the influence that directs us to conforming in order to be accepted by the group. In other words, we go along to get along. An example of this was when juror 7 had switched his vote after the majority of votes became “not guilty.” Juror 7 did not have his own insight nor his own reason as to why he thought the defendant should be deemed “not guilty.” Normative influence often leads to compliance, to act in accordance with the wishes of others even though you aren’t in agreement. When juror 7 was confronted and asked for the reason why he had changed his vote, he said quietly, “I … don’t think … he’s guilty.” Juror 7 did not believe that the defendant was “not guilty”, he simply went along with the group despite his belief. In short, juror 7 changed his vote due to imagined pressure from the other jurors.The opposite of normative influence, informational influence is also displayed in this…

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Influence

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Juror Three’s past negatively influences him to vote guilty despite all the evidence pointing to an acquittal. In Act One, Juror Three talks about his bitterness towards “tough kids”. He goes on and on…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Conformity

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It is obvious that the second juror to vote a not-guilty vote is not motivated either by the possibility of a reward or a punishment, nor does he appear to be conscious of being justice and rightful. He even claims that at that point he still believes in the probable guilt of the accused. He goes on explaining that the sudden change of his vote is merely based on his admiration for the lone dissenter, whom he begins to consider as a role-model, and his courage and strength to stand against conformity even in the face of ridicule. At this point of the film, it is noticeable that the second juror begins to identify with the lone dissenter. The mechanism of the identification process is at work and the charisma of the dissenter is further intensified by the rude and dismissive way in which another juror leaves the bathroom while the dissenter is speaking. Indeed, the second juror¡¦s desire to identify with the dissenting voice has been foreshadowed by several exchanges that have already set against the voice of the majority of the jurors which have been cast as either explicitly prejudiced, personally influenced, or exhibiting a near-total disinterest in the question of the accused¡¦s actual guilt or…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    But, can have steady impacts on someone who did not commit a crime being accused. For instance, within our adversarial process, the role of bias plays a big part in how the case is run. Whether it be deeply ingrained biases growing up, or just a prejudice that came about from growing up it has immense repercussions on wrongful convictions. Next, is a huge factor that affects many wrongful convictions cases. That would be eyewitness identification. Eyewitness identification has some good factors but also many bad factors. For instance, we looked into many studies on how sequential lineups can reduce false identifications of innocent suspects by reducing eyewitnesses’ reliance on relative judgment processes (Lindsay & Wells, 1985, p. 556). But also how people struggle to recall a certain person they have maybe seen in another situation. Another topic that’s become a growing topic is forensic evidence misconduct/errors. Many aspects can go into the makings of forensic evidence misconduct/errors. Many researchers like to study the quality control and training. The growing concern is whether bias and beliefs can greatly affect the outcome of an expert interpreting information like finger…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Conformity is probably the most obvious example of a social psychological example in this movie. Due to social influence conformity is shown within the first few moments of the film. The main vote is an example of a public vote and normal influences. Jurors vote by a show of hand. Several jurors exhibit definite signs of being undecided but give in to groups pressures and vote guilty.…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Obedience to authority is defined as a social influence in which an individual follows explicit instructions and orders from an authoritative figure. For example, in the beginning scene, the judge commanded that the jury must bring a non guilty verdict or else the verdict would face the death penalty. This is an example of obedience to authority because the jury has to listen the judge due to the fact that they have the most authority in the court during the trial. The jury has to obey the judge's wishes by coming up with a conclusion as to whether or not the suspect is guilty or not guilty. Another example from the movie is when the jury did their first vote of how many people thought the boy was guilty and how many thought that the boy was not guilty of his killing his father. Most people in the jury voted the suspect as guilty, so anyone who does not know will vote guilty to prevent controversy between the people who think the boy is guilty. Lastly, another example is when the 12 men (jury) would yell at each other. The person who yelled at everyone, would get everyone’s attention and stop everyone else from…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twelve angry men is a 1957 American Film that originated from a play of Reginald Rose and has been directed to a film by Sidney Lumet. The movie is not just about the outcome of the trial of a Puerto Rican youth who has been accused of murdering his father, but also shows how the beliefs and attitudes of the twelve jurors lead to his acquittal. Aside from that, this movie also shows Leadership traits that can help every individual on developing their leadership capabilities. The story started when the twelve jurors were put together in a sweltering deliberation room somewhere in America where they have been asked for their verdicts whether to put the child on chair or not. Eleven of them unanimously voted that the youth is guilty and must be…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    each juror has there own deficiencies or less than ideal qualities, these emerge through their interactions with eachother or their attitudes towards their trial. juror 10 is predjudice regularly using stereotypes to condemn the defendsant without actually considering if what he is saying is true. such as ‘a very big drinker’ or a born liar’ the third juror is guilty of stereotyping the defendant based on age, and he defends his opinions and stereotypes violently in the jury room, such as his near attack on 8th juror at the end of the first act. the play does not let a single character escape unflawed. even 8th juror,…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays