Preview

12 Angry Men - Jury Characters Essay Example

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
394 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
12 Angry Men - Jury Characters Essay Example
Juror # 1: He is the foreman on this jury. He takes his role very seriously but is seen at times to lose control of the proceedings of the group of jury members that he is supposed to oversee.
Juror # 2: He seems to be the most timid and nervous member of the jury. He is easily swayed by the opinion of others.
Juror # 3: He is the most vociferous member of the jury. He has some very strong opinions which at times appear to not be backed by any logic. His character shows some signs of sadism ingrained in him.
Juror # 4: He is a strong character who presents himself and his thoughts in a respectable manner at all times. He’s main concern is facts and he’s opinion is not swayed by any non-factual information about the case.
Juror # 5: He has lived in slums for a large part of his life and appears to suffer from a sense of low esteem as a result, which becomes obvious at various parts of the proceedings.
Juror # 6: He is a house painter who is happy to be a part of the jury as it means that he doesn’t have to work. He is accepting of views which differ from his own.
Juror # 7: He portrays an air of indifference to the case. He’s main concern is whether the proceedings will end before the baseball match whose tickets he has bought, starts.
Juror # 8: He is the only member who voted “not guilty” in the first voting. He’s main concern was that the trial was not handled in a proper manner by the defendants lawyer. He wanted to examine the evidence more thoroughly to see whether there was any room for doubt about the case.
Juror # 9: He is a mild mannered, gentle old man with a very keen sense of observation. He also values the efforts of juror # 8 and supports him with his own perceptive inputs.
Juror # 10: He is an abhorrent character whose bigotry becomes more and more obvious as the movie progresses.
Juror # 11: He is a European immigrant with a love for the American legal system.
Juror # 12: He works in an advertising agency and is often distracted from

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Juror 8 simply puts out questions and asks people to challenge their own beliefs. He is prepared to allow anyone to keep their own opinion without compromising his own.…

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    5. Juror #8 was able to convince the other 11 jurors simply because he presented good, valid arguments. He also knew how to separate the fact and fiction from the given facts.…

    • 336 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juror 3 is a strong, forceful man who refuses to alter his vote. Being very opinionated, he looks at the evidence “you sat right there in court and heard the same things, I did” (14) and doesn’t think beyond the facts. Still haunted by his own son, he verbally assaults the other jurors with mighty tone that knowing that a kid like his son is going to be locked up. Juror 3 and his son had some troubles with their relationship in the past. Juror 3 comes right out and says that he was going to make a man out of his son or bust him trying. Which in the end his son slaps his father across the face finally beating him back for the first time and fled town; since that day they haven’t spoken or seen each other. Since juror 3 feels that his son was not the way he was supposed to turn out, his feelings of his son were building up inside of him and were faced towards the case of the convicted.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    12 Angry Men: Overview

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages

    4th Juror: 4th Juror is a stock broker. He seems very serious. He deals with the facts of the case logically and uses facts.…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 8th Juror is a key character throughout the play. He is the only dissenter who votes ‘not guilty’ in the very beginning and says ‘it’s not easy to raise hand and send a boy off to die without talking about it first.’ As a logical, gentle and thoughtful character, the 8th Juror slowly works out the way to make the jury rethink the case and the possibility of the boy not killing his…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jury and Angriest Juror

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Juror #Eight Also insists that, “during the trial, too many questions were left unasked”. “He asks for the murder weapon to be brought in” and says that “it is possible that someone else stabbed the boy’s father…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The leader in the beginning of the deliberation was the high school football coach, juror number one. He tries to keep order in the hostile jury room. The role evolve to the Architect in the course of the film because he was the only odd ball in the room who vote not guilty and he manage to change everyone vote by the end of the film. His successful strategies for leading the group include encouraging equal and inclusive participation and taking time to deliberate slowly.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1)Because he is the first to agree with juror number eight , deciding that there is not enough evidence to sentence the young boy to death.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jurors 9 and 11 are crucial in supporting juror 8’s quest for justice. Juror 8 is able to acknowledge that the real truth may never be known, but he would rather, if there was any doubt, see a guilty man live rather than an innocent man die. Juror 8’s calm, reasoned delivery of facts and his ability to refute some of the evidence means that other jurors start to realise that a fair verdict means letting go of their preconceived notions and prejudices about the defendant and his background, ‘No one can really know, but we have reasonable doubt, and this is a safeguard that has enormous value in our system’. Like juror 3, Juror 9 is able to view the defendant objectively without letting prejudice cloud his judgement, ‘I don’t think the kind of boy he is has anything to do with it’. Juror 11 takes a similar rational and sensible approach to the likes of jurors 8 and 9 establishing that he is ‘simply asking questions’ and that ‘we [meaning the jurors] have a responsibility’ to uphold, not abuse. Juror 3’s blinded focus on discovering the truth (manipulated by his predetermined ideas) restricts him from passing a fair verdict on the defendant. Juror 3’s overlook of the case is tarnished as he mirrors his broken relationship with his son to the defendants and…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Now you can see the differences between Jurors Three and Eight. These two jurors are very different , especially when it comes to their personalities. Despite their differences they do have some similarities, which are stated in this essay. After reading this paper, you should better understand these two very different, but similar…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Juror 10

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There are two main characteristics of the 10th juror that influence his verdict. The first is that juror 10 is prejudiced against the defendant (most likely he is racist, but we can not be 100% sure). The second is that he is uncaring and impatient.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages

    11 other jury members, he still stood his ground and wanted a fair trial. Rose portrayed the 8th juror as…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    12 Angry Men

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Juror #3 came into this trial with a moral dilemma long before hearing the facts of the case. Given his past experiences, he would feel more inclined to vote guilty as to punish and make an example of this boy so that other kids would think twice. In this case if the jury decided on a guilty verdict, the defendant would be put to death. People might make rash decisions based…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    We have nothing to gain or lose by our verdict. This is one of the reasons why we are strong. We should not make it a personal thing.” Juror #11 is amplifying the importance in the civic duty they were partaking in, and is encouraging the jury to make their decision based on the facts presented to them, not from their personal beliefs. While some juror’s, especially Juror #3, included their personal beliefs in their decisions throughout the deliberation, many realized the importance of their job, and looked deep into the evidence presented to them before they reached a…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Juror 5 lived in slums and could relate to the accused but he chose to vote guilty as he felt attacked by the other jurors…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays