Zinn presents the major historical facts of the first 250 years of American history starting from when Christopher Columbus's Nina, Pinta, and Santa Maria landed in the Bahamas on October 12, 1492. It was there that Europeans and Native Americans first came into contact; the Arawak natives came out to greet the whites, and the whites were only interested in finding the gold. "They ... brought us parrots and balls of cotton and spears and many other things, which they owned...They were well-built, with good bodies and handsome features... They do not bear arms, and do not know them, for I showed them a sword, they took it by the edge and cut themselves out of ignorance. They have no iron. Their spears are made of cane... They would make fine servants... With fifty men we could subjugate them all and make them do whatever we want" (Zinn 1).…
In 1491, Charles C. Mann aims to prove a once-widespread belief about Native Americans false. This belief, which he calls Holmberg’s mistake, was first published in the book Nomads of the Longbow by Holmberg himself. Holmberg states that before European influence arrived in 1492, the Native Americans were nothing more than mere savages with lacking religion, no appreciation for the arts past feathered beads, little impact on the natural world around them, and nomadic lifestyles. Charles C. Mann, collecting evidence from various archeologists, paleontologists, and researchers from prestigious universities, sets out to show just how wrong Holmberg was in his thinking.…
Howard Zinn A Peoples History of the United States Chapter 1: Columbus, the Indians and Human Progress Can historians avoid emphasis on some facts and not others? Historians are selective, they simplify and they emphasize what they believe is important and gloss over other things they view as less important. “This distortion is ideological; it is released into a world of contending interests, where any chosen emphasis supports (whether the historian means to or not) some kind of interest, whether economic or political or racial or national or sexual.” p.8 This emphasis assumes that everyone has the same goals and viewpoints.…
2. There are many scholarly disagreements about the research described in 1491. If our knowledge of the past is based on the findings of scholars, what happens to the past when scholars don’t agree? How convincing is anthropologist Dean R. Snow’s statement, "you can make the meager evidence from the ethnohistorical record tell you anything you want" [p. 5]? Are certain scholars introduced here more believable than others? Why or why not?…
The myth is that the conquistadors conquered the America’s relatively quickly in a sovereign effort but Restall explains that the Spaniards had a lot of help from the Natives and African’s and the “completion” of conquest was anything but; as mass portions of the land remained unscathed by the conquest. Restall effortlessly explains how the conquistador myths of superior communication between the Spaniards and Natives were just as fabricated as the modern misconception of inferior communication by historians. The communication between the two, or lack thereof, fell somewhere between both myths. Restall uses his concise writing style to explain the resilience of the Natives, debunking the myth of Native desolation and how the myth of superiority derives from Eurocentric beliefs of racial dominance which lead to racist ideologies that “underpinned colonial expansion from the late fifteenth to early twentieth centuries.”…
In the absence of some rigorous examination of remains by qualified individuals we are left with the prospect of conflicting claims that characterizes "Kennnewick Man: The Soap". If affiliation is determined by legislative fiat or dueling attorneys, we all lose. Classifying remains as Native American because they are found in North America does some violence to common sense - are Toyotas indigenous because we find them here? Vine DeLoria's views notwithstanding, the peopling of the New World remains a story to be told. It is possible that the Americas were peopled more than once by groups from parts of the world that conventional wisdom has long dismissed. David closes his book with the account of a collaborative project in Alaska that offers a real alternative to the disputes surrounding Kennewick Man. Hopefully such cooperation will be a model for archaeological research, and the picture of Native American prehistory that it renders will be more complete because of its inclusiveness. All in all, a superb read that encourages us to examine our motives and to recall the obscenities that have occurred in the past, and almost certainly will occur again, for…
5. What is Zinn's basic criticism of historian Samuel Eliot Morison's book, Christopher Columbus, Mariner?…
The Pre-Columbian Era is the time period before the famous voyage of Columbus in the year 1492. Although history teaches us that the way those that came before us behaved was justified, it may not all be true. However I cannot judge past actions based on today’s standards because of the way things have changed so drastically. Knowing what really happened is important for us to grow and to learn more about ourselves. In this essay I will cover how the Europeans viewed other people, the expansion of Europe and colonization; as well as Britain’s colonies and politics. I will also discuss how the colonists and Indians lived and how Anglo America came about.…
13. What ultimately happened to the estimated 10 million Indians living in North America at the time of Columbus’ arrival?…
Christopher Columbus was born between August and October 1451 in Genoa, Italy. After 41 years, Christopher finally began his first voyage on August 3, C.1492. He had three ships, the Pinta, the Niña and the Santa Maria which the Queen and King of Spain gave to him for his first voyage. According to gilder lehrman, ‘Christopher sailed to the Bahamas that he called San Salvador but the indigenous people called it Guanahani. For nearly five months, Columbus explored the Caribbean Sea, Specifically the islands of Juana (Cuba) and Hispaniola (Santo Domingo), before returning to Spain.’ The gold, parrots, spice, and humans captives Columbus displayed for his sovereigns at Barcelona convinced all of the need for a rapid second voyage. On september…
Before 1492, the people on the “New World” and people on the “Old World” had knew nothing about the existences of each other. On the…
We now estimate that as many as seven million people were living in North America 500 years ago, and that their ancestors had been on this continent for at least thirteen thousand years. For all this time—hundreds of generations—they had remained isolated from Asia and Africa and Europe, building their own separate world. Over many centuries, these first North Americans developed diverse cultures that were as varied as the landscapes they lived in. And they developed hundreds of different languages.…
Considering the "New World" had already been inhabited before Christopher Columbus' 1492 "discovery", it is safe to say that his voyage to what he perceived to be the West Indies caused a major ripple effect that ultimately brought immense destruction to the Americas. While Columbus' "discovery" did in fact instigate a somewhat positive exchange of goods and ideas between European societies and the Native Americans, his arrival brought on more harm than good, primarily to the natives of this new land. The diseases that became prominent with the presence of European, domesticated animals, was far too much for the Native Americans' immune systems, as they had no previous contact with such germs. As a result, an estimated 90% of this population…
"During the four centuries spanning the time between 1492, when Christopher Columbus first set foot on the "New World" of a Caribbean beach, and 1892, when the U.S. Census Bureau concluded that there were fewer than a quarter million indigenous people surviving within the country’s claimed boundaries, a hemispheric population estimated to have been as great as 125 million was reduced by something over 90 percent. The people had died in their millions by being hacked apart with axes and swords, burned alive and trampled under horses, hunted as game and fed to dogs, shot, beaten, stabbed, scalped for bounty, hanged on meat hooks and thrown over the sides of ships at sea, worked to death as slave laborers, intentionally starved and frozen to death during a multitude of forced marches and internments, and, in an unknown number of instances, deliberately infected with epidemic…
“America has never been united by blood or birth or soil.” stated by George W. Bush. It is believed by some, that the changes in “America” began in late 1492 with the arrival of Christopher Columbus and the Spanish flag to the New World however, this was not the first voyage to arrive but the Scandinavian seafarers came first. Columbus’ arrival led to the discovery of the indigenous people, Native Americans. Plans for the New World were virtually see through for those who understood the evil characteristics the world can display “with fifty men they can all be subjugated and made to do what is required of them”(The New World,15), Columbus writes to the Crown. To the Native Americans, the motive of the voyages were not as clear and seemed quite beneficial due to the nature of which their communities was ran, Columbus even stated that, “They are very gentle…