Preview

14th Amendment

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
9110 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
14th Amendment
____________

IN THE

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Spring TERM 2013 ___________

Francis Lake, Petitioner, v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ________________

On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourteenth Circuit ________________ BRIEF FOR PETITIONER ________________

TEAM IDENTIFICATION: CA

Team Letter: CA Attorneys for Petitioner

Table of Contents

Question Presented.......................................... iii Table of Authorities........................................ iv Statement of Jurisdiction................................... 1 Statement of the Case ....................................... 2 Statement of the Facts...................................... 2 Summary of the Argument...................................... 10 Standard of Review .......................................... 12 Argument ................................................. 12

2

TEAM IDENTIFICATION: CA

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Compliance Order issued under the Clean Water Act violated Mr. Lake’s due process rights under the Fifth Amendment. 2. Whether the Environmental Protection Agency violated the Eminent Domain clause of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution. 3. Whether the Defense of Marriage Act is federal action encroaching on an area traditionally occupied by the states and thus unconstitutional under the 10th and 14th Amendments.

3

TEAM IDENTIFICATION: CA

Table of Authorities Cases 545 U.S. 515 Am. Civil Liberties Union Found. v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, 833 F. Supp. 399 (S.D.N.Y. 1993)……………………………………………………………………. 20 30

Andrus v. Allard, 444 U.S. 51 (1979)…………………………………………………………………… 18 Armstrong v. Manzo, 380 U.S. 545,(1965)…………………………………………………. 7, 8

Bd. of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 (1972)… 11 Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186, 106 S. Ct. 2841, 92 L. Ed. 2d 140 (1986)………………. 30 Commonwealth Edison Co. v. United States, 46 Fed. Cl. 29

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Mapp V. Ohio Case Study

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Statement of key Issues: 1) was the search of Mapps home a violation of the fourth amendment? 2) Was the evidence used against Mapps in court illegal?…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Citations: United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549, 115 S. Ct. 1624, 131 L. Ed. 2d 626 (1995).…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Star Charters v. Figueroa, 192 Ill. 2d 47, 733 N.E.2d 1282, 2000 Ill. LEXIS 987, 248 Ill. Dec. 284 (2000)…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Summary: On April 17, 1905, the Supreme Court ruled in the favor of Lochner declaring that setting a maximum hour work per week is unconstitutional. New York passed a law stating that it was not allowed for any employee to be allowed to work more than 60 hours a week. Lochner was fined 50 dollars for this and later convicted due to him not paying it, where he appealed it to the supreme court. The supreme court stated that this law broke the 14th amendment because it violated life, liberty, and property. They claimed that the ability to buy and sell labor through contract was a liberty and it could not be restricted by the state government.…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Understanding this, it should be understood that it should not matter what individuals believe, who they donate to or what or who they support. However, it appears more and more often that this idea of 14th amendment is being used to limit the 1st amendment. In another recent Pew Research study, they found that 40% of millennials would be in favor of limiting what people can and cannot say. Especially in regards to or about minority groups. This was compared to other groups such as Gen X and Baby Boomers where the percentage was found to at 27% and 24% . This stark compression shows what some are willing to give up, in order to appease others and to prevent the sins of the past.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tax Research Memo

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages

    | IRC § 6013 (a)IRC § 2 (b)IRC § 152 KNOCHELMANN, JR. v. COMM., (sixth circuit) Cite as 108 AFTR 2d 2011-6011, 08/30/2011 , Code Sec(s) 152; 151; 21; 24; 1; 2…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Bellah, John L. (2007, April). Cutting the Chase. Police Magazine, Retrieved April 10, 2007, from http://www.policemag.com/t_cipick.cfm?rank=88363…

    • 3453 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Armarcion D. Henderson v. The United States of America, 11-9307 (2011). Retrieved from thecocklebur.com Academic database .…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Courtroom Observation

    • 2129 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Bibliography: Gumpresht, M. E. (2008, March 12). Memorandum in Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment. Civil Action No. 82A04-8876-CV-285…

    • 2129 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The exclusionary rule is an important doctrine supporting the ideals of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. The Fourth Amendment provides people under the jurisdiction of the American criminal justice system protections from unreasonable searches and seizures. The amendment also delineates the methods members of the criminal justice system may obtain information via judicially sanctioned search warrants based on probable cause. The exclusionary rule exempts some evidence even when the seizure or location of the evidence may violate the Fourth Amendment. The rule also provides some benefits and detriments for members of the criminal justice system when gathering evidence or prosecuting offenders. However, the exclusionary rule is an important doctrine to members of the criminal justice system demonstrating a means to introduce evidence in the furtherance of justice.…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Search and Seizure

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages

    State v. Pearson, 234 Kan. 906, 631 P.2d 605 (1984); Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412. Thompson v Louisiana 469 US 17 (1984).S. 218, 225-26, 93 S.Ct. 2041, 36 L.Ed.2d,…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court History and Purpose

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages

    People in the United States attend court every day for different many reasons. Those reasons could be for traffic violations, civil law suits, or for unlawful criminal acts. No matter what they are all handled and disputed in a court of law. Courts are empowered to make fair and binding decisions upon the facts that are received. There are two types of courts; civil court and criminal court. It is very important that people understand and know the differences between civil and criminal courts. Civil courts handle resolutions between private parties and usually consist of one party suing the other for some type of monetary damages. Criminal courts on the other hand, try alleged offenders for suspected crimes committed, whereas the end result is either freedom for the offender or a prison cell.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil Rights

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    403 U.S. 217; 91 S. Ct. 1940; 29 L. Ed. 2d 438; 1971 U.S. LEXIS 27…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Revision

    • 2223 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Contents * 1 Facts * 2 Preliminary objection of the defendants * 3 Judgment * 3.1 Issue of absolute liability * 4 Order of the court * 5 References…

    • 2223 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Example of Memorial

    • 5211 Words
    • 21 Pages

    TABLE OF CONTENTS Index of Authorities .................................................................................................... iii Statement of Jurisdiction.............................................................................................. iv Statement of Facts ..........................................................................................................v Questions Presented ...................................................................................................viii Summary of Pleadings ..................................................................................................ix Pleadings I. APELLANT HAS NO MENS REA FOR THE OFFENCE………...…………...1 A. Absence of intention since the device had automatically connected……………2 B. Respondent is careless for having a no-password-protection wifi……………....2 II. APPELLANT HAS NO INTENTION TO AVOID PAYMENT FOR THE SERVICE HE RECEIVED..........................................................................................5 III. THE POLICE COMPUTER FORENSIC ANALYST IS NOT AN EXPERT........................................................................................................................7 A. No formal education on forensic computer………………..……………….…...7 B. Mere experience cannot be amounted as an expert…………………………......9 C. Evidence made is not of the same weight as made by those who have special studies…………………………………………………………………………...9 IV. THE POLICE COMPUTER FORENSIC ANALYST LACKS OF EXPERTISE…………………………………………………………………………10 A. Absence of ability to explain how the tool (the computer forensic software) works………………………………………………………………………...…10 B. A bare expression of opinion has no evidential value at all……………….…..12 Conclusion and prayer for relief………………………………………………….......15…

    • 5211 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays