Russia was torn between the world war and the population was threatened as levels of starvation rose whilst industry fell. The provisional government could not do much to stop Russia plummeting as they did not have much power and the people of Russia failed to support them (1). The citizens of Russia were desperately looking for help and the Bolshevik party, created with the help of Lenin and Trotsky in the year 1917, had the answer. Slowly, they had managed to become one of the most powerful parties ever created, but many factors were to cause the consolidation of power. In this essay I will be comparing the significance of Vladimir Lenin in the Bolshevik consolidation of power with another important factor; Leon Trotsky.…
The Tsarist autocracy has succeeded for more than three hundred years, but the Russian Revolution that occurred on November 1917 ended the long term autocracy. During this time period, Tsar Nicholas II was the leader of Russia and indeed the last one. He caused Russia’s downfall and made many Russians frustrated about the government. The Tsar did not acknowledge the nation's problems and failed to improve the lives of the citizens. As the Russians struggled with limited rights and lack of help from Nicholas II, they had to make a move. Although peasant unrest led to the Russians protesting and rebelling against the country, the Russian Revolution occurred because of Tsar Nicholas II’s weak leadership, in which he failed to accomplished the Russian’s goals, horribly managed the military, and thought that the system should not change.…
The Russian revolution which began in 1905 was a wave of mass political and social unrest that spread through vast areas of the Russian empire.…
The revolution of 1917 was the culmination of a number of factors coming together and causing the volatile mix of reasons to come together and boil over. The people of Russia where fed up with the horrible conditions they had to put up with and decided to do something about it. Some factor I will discuss include the industrialization,…
|1905 |June |Battleship Potemkin uprising at Odessa on the Black Sea (see movie The Battleship Potemkin). |…
As the soldiers pillaged the towns, the people had no more belonging or money and so poverty became an even larger problem in Russia. Throughout these events, the people had no say and no way to change their position. Their rights were stripped from them and the common people were forced to live as slaves for the bolshevik party. During the Russian Revolution, there was a great amount change. The Leadership and the ideas and goals of the country changed but the issues and rights of the common people did…
The Russian Revolution was supposed to bring about change for the better and be a fantastic new beginning for the troubled state of Russia. However, the concept of a revolution is sometimes a lot more appealing than the actual results of a revolution. Revolutions never occur without hurting a certain group of people, which goes without saying, but they also try to better life for other groups. The Russian Revolution seemed to cause much pain and misery, but the benefits from this revolution appeared to be few if any. Nobles, who once had incredible power and prestige, were then stripped to single room houses and bitter cold because they had to money to buy coal. The working class of society changed from being bitter poor to being moderately impoverished. The Russian Revolution hurt many people and helped few.…
The causes of the Russian Revolution were that Russia’s people pre-world war one had a lot of pressure being put on it from agriculture and industrialization. The Russian people were also experiencing social changes that only added to the stress that the people where feeling. Russia was building a lot of factories and between 1905 and 1914 Russia’s production increased one hundred percent. This put a lot of stress on the working class of Russia.…
The Russian Revolution was one of the most important revolutions in history. Just like the French people, Russians got tired of being treated unfairly by the Higher classes, and so decided to revolt against them. However unlike the French, they could not be satisfied, or entertained for long by a single revolution, reason why they did many revolts. Each time retreating at its middle, until they finally were annoyed and determined enough to overthrow the Government and change their lives as they knew it. Even so, that wasn’t the only cause of the Russian Revolution, along the many revolts came various relevant causes and events, but only few of them stood out, with such importance to today’s history of the causes for the Russian…
The 1905 revolution was the final concentrated outburst of domestic opposition, and highlighted that the regime of Tsar Nicholas II had many very serious problems. The problems he faced were not only from the peasantry and the rapidly expanding urban workforce (Industrial workers) but also from the educated middle class who were no longer willing to work towards the Tsars regime as it caused too many problem for its people. Several decades of oppression led to many political parties who no longer wanted to be unquestionably obedient to the Tsar and his autocracy. Repression under Alexander III may have had the desired effect for the short term but it also aroused resentment and bitterness which damaged Tsarism in the long term, forcing Tsar Nicholas II to face them.…
The fall of the Provisional government and the Bolshevik Revolution sparked many changes for Russia in 1917. It changed Russia for always. The economic system changed from a capitalist system to a socialist economy, peasants were granted the land that they already took in the February/March revolution and it ended the war and made peace in Russia. The lead up to the revolution can be traced back as far as March during the February/March revolution of 1917.…
'Brushed aside the hand that was offered them’ this was said by Milyukov, Kadet leader. It can be argued that the most important reason of the cause of the 1917 revolution was the tsar’s political failings, where he lost his last opportunity of saving the Romanov dynasty. However in this essay one will argue that the economic problems caused be World War 1 was the most important; looking at the food shortages, transport problems and inflation. One will also discuss World War 1’s political problems; the tsar’s long absences, Rasputin and Alexandra’s felt hatred from the public and wide-spread strikes. Finally, one will discuss the spark of the revolution when the tsar ‘brushed away’ his supporters, turning them against him. Overall in this essay one will argue the economic problems caused by World War 1 were the most significant cause of the 1917 revolution.…
The French revolution in 1789 evolved out of a state of fiscal crisis. France had lost copious amounts of money supporting the American Revolution. There was famine across the country; the peasants were unhappy. France had no money, and Louis XVI consulted an advisor on the issue. In the end, the Estates-General, a form of parliament, was born. The third estate, ordinary people, became frustrated and vowed at the Tennis Court Oath on June 20th, 1789; it can be considered a bottom-up revolution, beginning from the lower class. The Russian revolution emerged out of a similar scenario. There was widespread famine and poverty across Russia. Bloody Sunday in 1905, a demonstration marched towards the Winter Palace, was orchestrated by peasants, similarly another bottom-up case. In its wake, Tsar Nicholas II implemented the Duma, a form of parliament, in an attempt to solve the crisis. Demonstrations continued until full revolution broke out in 1917. Also, Tsar Nicholas II, in an attempt to unite his country, placed Russia at war during WWI in 1914. This broke the state up even further; civilians found it humiliating because of the battles lost, famine continued to spread, and many people were dying. Similarities prior to the revolutions of France and Russia include financial crisis, implementation of a body of parliament in an attempt to solve the pending…
It was reckless and irresponsible to reason that World War One would surely end mass conflict in the world. The war’s effects were too harsh to suggest that each country involved would live harmoniously for years to come. Millions of soldiers died in the conflict, and many more returned with illness. Unfair treaties, changing social and political landscapes, and exhausted economies were further evidence of a chaotic Europe after the war. Consequently, these harsh effects warranted a response from Europe.…
Even before 1917, poverty was an issue that led to the people of Russia trying to revolt against tsar Nicholas I. ("Russian Revolution.") Though the revolution failed, World War I added to the tension as Russia suffered tremendous losses, and it’s economy dissolved. Food became scarce and people were forced to rely on rations. This, of course, only secured the path towards a revolution, and riots eventually broke out in St. Petersburg, and Tsar Nicholas II was overthrown. This revolution marked the end of the Romanov dynasty.("Russian Revolution of 1917") Though poverty mostly held a major role in the February revolution, the Provisional Government that had been established by the Duma, or Russian Parliament, had failed to meet its promise of improving the economy which led to people’s support going to the Soviets. The Soviets did not ignore their advantage and ordered the military to only obey their orders. Once the Provisionals saw that they were losing power, they tried to take control of St. Petersburg, but failed. Soon after the failed coup, it was agreed at the All-Russian Congress of the Soviets that the Bolsheviks were to take control of the country, which they did while being led by Leon…