the infamous Scopes Trial of 1926. Twenty-four year old high school teacher John Thomas Scopes of Dayton, Tennessee decided to test a law called the Butler Act. Many teachers felt that honor and academic freedom along with the separation of church and state were at risk. In y 1925 Scopes was accused of teaching Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution to his class which violated the Butler Act of 1925. Scopes was provoked by the American Civil Union Act because of their promise to pay for the defense of anyone willing to violate the Butler Act. The trial brought upon two outstanding lawyers of the time, William Jennings Bryan (three-time Democratic candidate for President and a populist) in prosecution and Clarence Darrow (leading member of American Civil Liberties Union and famous for world renown criminal defense) in defense. It was believed by most scientists that biology could not be taught without making some sort of reference to the theory of evolution, but being that the people of Tennessee were such strong believers of the bible, many of the Christian Fundamentalist saw that the theory of evolution denied their religious beliefs. This trial was definitely a conflict between religion and science; hence the people of Tennessee were gravely angered by the teachings of Darwin’s theory because it contradicted the creation of man that was stated in the bible. This case was a watershed in this religion-science conflict that eventually led to three major following the trial: The Butler Act was discontinued, the Scopes Trial upheld defeat of religion over science, and the trial reflected the social conflict that took place in the American Society during the 1920s.…
Thomas Bruscino is an author the book “A Nation Forged in War,” where he discusses the events America faced and went through during a time where Americans were prejudice towards another’s religion, race, and ethnicity. The united states were a divided place with no hope to change until the U.S. was brought to war in the early 1940s. but how did Americans come to tolerate others religion, race, and ethnicity? Bruscino answers the question in 7 sections of his book. He writes how Americans would not vote for a president based on his religion, how your religion and origin would affect the way you got a job of into a school. How soldiers left America to find a new world without intolerance and prejudice. How the soldiers came to love one another…
Stand ye calm and resolute, Like a forest close and mute, With folded arms and looks which are Weapons of unvanquished war. And if then the tyrants dare, Let them ride among you there; Slash, and stab, and maim and hew; What they like, that let them do. Throughout history, the United States has had to face countless controversial issues that have had the potential to divide society and threaten the fundamental laws of the land. These issues are a recurring in American history and have been present since our American experiment was first tested.…
The challenge to a variety of political and social issues distinctly characterizes the post World War II (WWII) era, from the mid 1940’s through the 1970’s, in the United States. These issues included African-American civil rights, women’s rights, the threat of Communism, and America’s continuous war effort by entering the Cold War immediately after the end to WWII. These debated issues led to the birth of multiple social movements, collectively referred to as the New Left, rooted in liberalism. In response to the New Left, a strong brand of conservatism, collectively referred to as the Right, arose to counteract these movements. Despite opposing ideology and convictions, both the New Left and the Right interchangeably used righteous language of freedom, morality, Christianity, and human rights, particularly in the issues of African-American civil rights, women’s rights, Communism, and the U.S. war effort in the Cold War, to justify and promote each of their respective agendas.…
In July of 1925, John Thomas Scopes was put on trial in Tennessee for violating the Butler Act, which was a state law that prohibited evolution to be taught in state-funded schools. By using texts from famous scientists like Charles Darwin and new sources of literature from “Modernists,” which were people who claimed that evolution could be consistent with the bible, Scopes taught his students the theory of evolution. Due to the theory “challenging Christian faith,” Scopes was quickly dismissed from his teaching position, put on trial in Dayton, Tennessee, and fined $100. Even though Scopes was embarrassed and disheartened, he disagreed with the state’s ruling and had the verdict overturned due to the technicality that claimed it was not “science,” but it was part of a philosophical discussion. A few years after the incident, an Englishman named…
In 1920s America, the Americans had just won the Great War, women had become victorious in the fight for their rights, and the younger generations of Americans were starting to stray from the orthodox ways of life. As a result of the new modern ways developing in America, the conflicting views of the traditional orthodox south and the modern urban north began to clash. These conflicting views, which primarily revolved around morals and religious beliefs, came into light with the Scopes Trial. Prior to the Scopes Trial, John Washington Butler proposed a bill to the state of Tennessee that it would be “...a crime there to teach ‘any theory that denies the story of the Divine creation of man as taught in the Bible, and to teach instead that man…
Today evolution is taught in public schools in America, but it has not always been that way. The legal battle that led to the teaching of evolution in public schools has been a very long one. Creationism was taught in public schools until the late 19th century. Following Darwin’s theories being introduced in 1859 many began to accept evolution during the 1860’s. This would continue in America until a flamboyant, Christian, lawyer named William Jennings Bryan campaigned against the teaching of evolution. Bryan found supporters very easily because of a grassroots movement in America following World War I; which was a vast change in society that led people towards a simpler and more religious lifestyle. This movement led several states to create laws banning the teaching of evolution in public schools. Bryan and his movement was of course opposed by many which led to the legal battles that have taken America from a non-evolution teaching society to the evolution teaching society it is today. In this paper I will discuss the first major court case that brought significant national attention to these laws.…
The twentieth century Scopes trial may have started out as a simple debate between evolutionists and creationists, but quickly escalated to a debate of historic proportions. The 1920s were times of change in the United States, from women getting the right to vote to prohibition to changes in education, such as the Butler Act, which created unease and animosity throughout the country. The Butler Act of 1925 prohibited the teaching of evolution and any other theories that deny the story of the divine creation of man as taught in the Bible in all Universities and public schools in Tennessee. John Scopes, a high-school biology teacher in Dayton, Tennessee decided to test this law. He was found guilty of teaching evolution to his high-school students despite the Butler Act, resulting in a court trial that brought strong personalities of both the North and South into one courtroom. These conflicting personalities brought to light the real reasons behind the intensity of the trial. Fear played a big part in the trial because creationists and traditionalists truly feared the rejection of God, the Divine Creation of man and the Bible because they feared for the morality of civilization. As the times changed there was more pressure for Americans to modernize their ideas but traditionalists believed these changes caused people to stray from the word of God and the Bible and had no desire to change their God-fearing ways. Antipathy was also growing stronger between the North and the South resulting in biased opinions on many subjects. The Scopes trial controversy was more complicated than a simple debate between evolutionists and creationists because of the fear and bias generated in a time of advancement from traditionalism to modernism.…
As never seen before, Americans are fascinated with military power. This is the issue that The New American Militarism addresses and is based on. This book explains how America as a nation has increased its dependence on war ultimately resulting in its normalization. Bacevich who is the author and a veteran of the Vietnam War points out that the very concept of war has morally deteriorated the American Identity as a whole and theorizes that” Americans have fallen prey to war which will result in their downfall and that James Madison's warning is still relevant to those of our time.…
During the 1920’s, there most certainly was moral revolutions in America and traditional values were most certainly being challenged by the newer generation. Of course, for example, with the introduction of Hollywood, reforming attitudes that were towards and adopted to women and the economic boom of the 1920’s this was most certainly going to have an effect of the general American public’s moral values. Whilst these changing attitudes may be perceived by traditionalists to be shaping a moral crisis at the time, this essay looks to explore on whether or not there was actually a moral crisis in America in the 1920’s or whether the USA marked society in moral change rather than in entering into a moral crisis, which is defined as a crisis in which you are torn between what you know to be the wrong thing and the right thing, which it is often criticised of by the older generations at the time.…
American history is littered with tails of reform and revolution. Earlier on in America’s young life, revolution included war, struggle for basic human rights and dignity as well as radical tactics taken by the public. As time went on Americans learned that revolution and reform could occur through the government systems that our forefathers had put in place. The battle for human rights has all but ended but the way in which Americans wage war is a different story altogether. Now American’s fight for better public healthcare, equal rights for homosexual individuals and couples, and stricter standards for social welfare programs.…
The roaring 20's was a period of economic boom and prosperity, but there was a darker underside to this. American society was undergoing vast changes in the early twentieth century. The world was changing and America was not to be left behind. In the past America had been a very intolerant society with slavery being one of its key industries and although it operated a ‘melting pot’ open door policy was the white, Anglo Saxon, Protestant (W.A.S.P) society really as open minded as they liked to believe about the mixture of other cultures? The aim of this essay is to try and explore how intolerant American society really was, looking into the key areas of racism, political and religion intolerance and the other side of the argument.…
In 1925 religion and scientific theory collided in a courtroom. John Scopes, a school biology teacher, deliberately violated the state’s anti-evolutionism statute. The fundamentalists won their case in court. The Tennessee state prosecutor won a conviction against Scopes on the grounds that the legislature had the right to determine what was taught in public schools within the state.…
Many people came to America seeking for a new begging, wanting to have freedom and posterity. Families from over seas sought religious freedom. This dream was beautiful and innocent, but was soon corrupted by the vulgarity of American life.…
Perhaps the most famous example of this early prejudice was the famous Scopes Trial, which took place in Tennessee in 1925. The case involved a law that had recently been passed through the state assembly, known as the Butler Act, prohibiting the teaching of evolution in the public classroom. The American Civil Liberties Union offered to defend anyone charged with breaking the law. A Dayton high school science and math teacher, John T. Scopes, was asked by other locals who opposed the bill if he would agree to be charged with breaking the law under the Butler Act. Scopes agreed, and the trial generated national attention, even being broadcast over the radio. William Jennings Bryan, the nation’s foremost advocate for religious fundamentalism at the time, was on the prosecution team, opposing Clarence Darrow, the most famous criminal defense lawyer also well-known for being an agnostic. While Bryan successfully obtained a conviction of Scopes, it was overturned by the Tennessee Supreme Court following an appeal. Following the trial, several states saw a concerted effort by fundamentalists to ban the teaching of evolution in public…