Preview

1967 referendum

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1019 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
1967 referendum
ATS1259
The 1967 Referendum
The 1967 referendum was the repeal of section 127 and section 51 in the Commonwealth Constitution. With the repeal of these two sections the “Federal Government were allowed to make laws for Aborigines and Aborigines were now counted in the national census”(About the 1967 Referendum). The 1967 referendum can be commonly considered the turning point in Australian history and culture for finally addressing discrimination towards the Indigenous people and taking responsibility for Aboriginal affairs. However, some do not have the same representation of the results of the 1967 referendum because of the little improvement it has done for the Indigenous people. People have a negative representation of the 1967 referendum because there is still inequality between Aboriginals and non-Aboriginals. Henry Reynolds argues the significance due to the fact that, “It was highly significant that the measure was passed with such commanding majorities in almost every part of the continent”(Reynolds). Reynolds is referring to the highest YES vote of 99.77%, to be recorded for a federal referendum in Australian history. This was significant due to the fact that Australians were aware of the conditions Indigenous people faced, and wanted the Commonwealth government to do something to help. In past history, Australians thought of themselves as a white society. The referendum signified that “Australians were ready to embrace social and political reform”(About the 1967 Referendum). There were many major and minor events that lead up to the referendum. In the 1930s, people like William Cooper, William Ferguson, and Jack Patten started organizations to raise awareness to help improve the lives of Aborigines. They did this by organizing events, such as the Day of Mourning in Sydney on January 26, 1938. This day was a protest aboriginals held to represent 150 years of cruel treatment and the take over of the land. “They also petitioned the



Bibliography: Reynolds, Henry. "Aboriginals and the 1967 Referendum: 30 Years on." Aboriginal Sovereignty. N.p.: n.p., n.d. 55-67. Print. Jessie M.G. Street, Report on Aborigines in Australia, May/June 1957, p.3. "Reflections: 40 Years on from the 1967 Referendum." Aboriginal Legal Rights Movement Inc., 2007. Web. 17 Aug. 2013. Peterson, Nicholas, and Will Sanders. "Google Books." Google Books. Cambridge University Press, n.d. Web. 18 Aug. 2013. "Didj "u" Know - 1967 Referendum." Didj "u" Know - 1967 Referendum. ABC, n.d. Web. 17 Aug. 2013. Behrendt, Larissa. "The 1967 Referendum 40 Years on." Reflections: 40 Years on from the 1976 Referendum. Aboriginal Legal Rights Movement Inc, n.d. Web. 17 Aug. 2013. "About the 1967 Referendum." VCAA, 212. Web. 17 Aug. 2013. "The 1967 Referendum." The 1967 Referendum. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 Aug. 2013.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Mabo Case Note

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Catchwords: Aborigines, native title, Constitutional law, reception of common law in Australian and other, settled colonies, terra nullius, Real Property…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the back of the recent landslide referendum on the recognition of Aboriginal people in the national census, the Whitlam government greatly increased the social and political rights of first nation Australians. The government instituted a policy of ‘self-determination’ which decentralised decision making powers to indigenous communities. They allowed Aboriginals to claim land and brought more Indigenous voices into the policy making process. From the outset, Whitlam made Indigenous affairs a top priority for his government and indicated that justice had to be served in order for Australia to move forward as a country. The subsequent Fraser Government committed to continue these reforms. A powerful example Whitlam’s loyalty to this issue was in his remarks to an Aboriginal tribe where he declared Indigenous ownership of a Victorian river. Whitlam in his speech to the Gurindji people stated “these lands belong to the Gurindji people and I put into your hands this piece of the earth itself as a sign that we restore them to you and your children…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    March 1967, then-Prime Minister Harold Holt announced the news. The referendum would be held that year, to repeal…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Land of the Gubbi Gubbi

    • 1929 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The aim of this paper is to research, analyse and assess available information regarding the Sunshine Coast Indigenous Gubbi Gubbi nation, in particular, the ease of access to information; the currency and scope of available information; and to develop a conclusion regarding the validity of examined resources.…

    • 1929 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 1967 Referendum was an extremely momentous event for Indigenous Australians; it signified that legal discrimination towards Aborigines would end soon, and promised full and equal citizenship to them. The Referendum not only affected their rights and freedoms, but also indicated that the nation was prepared to embrace Indigenous people as a part of their society and culture.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Secondly, Larissa Behrendt, is another Aboriginal activist who acknowledges that the ‘dissent’ amongst Indigenous people is largely because there is still uncertainty in the community regarding the referendum. This also makes Maddison’s assumption that the recognise campaign is a hindrance to constitutional change clear. Running the campaign before a reform to the constitution was proposed meant that Indigenous and Torres Strait Islander people could not communicate with the government properly and have no participation in debates. Similarly, the article…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    commonwealth law

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages

    On 6 November 1999, a referendum was proposed to transform Australia into a Republic and replace Governor-General with a president. However, the transformation has failed as majority of the people in Australia does not…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why was the 1967 referendum significant in the fight for aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people?…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The 1967 Referendum

    • 308 Words
    • 1 Page

    The 1967 Referendum was certainly a milestone in Australia’s history. It was a public vote to determine Australia’s opinion on altering the Constitution in regards to Indigenous Australians. It was a vote proposing to include Aboriginal people in the census and to allow the Commonwealth Government to create laws for them. Fortunately, on 27 May 1967, an overwhelming 90.77% recorded the largest ever “yes” in the referendum to allow the 2 amendments in the constitution take place.…

    • 308 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Native Title Analysis

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Aboriginal Integration Policy – 1965 – introduced to give Aboriginal people more control of their lives and society…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The treatment of Indigenous Australians by the government has been an issue of controversy since White Europeans settled in Australia. Throughout history Aboriginals have developed and hosted many protests, sometimes with the help of the White Europeans that wanted to make a difference to get back rights and freedoms of Aboriginals.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To be able to pass laws and money onto Aboriginal Australians the constitution had to be changed. Therefore a referendum had to take place over two issues;…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Section 41 of the Commonwealth Electoral Act stated that only those who had the right to vote in their state, then had the right to vote in Commonwealth elections (Australia Electoral Commission 2011). The Act was interpreted very narrowly to Aboriginal people. According to the Act, only those Aboriginal people whose names were already on the electoral roll for their state elections would be able to vote in the Commonwealth elections. In 1962, Commonwealth Electoral Act provided that indigenous people should have the right to enrol and vote at Federal elections, including Northern Territory elections (Australia Electoral Commissiion 2011). However, the enrolment was not compulsory, and a low level of education for Aboriginals often allows for inadequacies and therefore they do not take their voting right seriously. In addition, The Northern Territory is not a state, so their votes have not the same weight as the votes from the residents of the states. Inequalities from various respects susggest that the voting system under-represents the will of Aboriginals in the…

    • 2643 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bibliography: Belanger, Y., Newhouse, D. (2006). The Canada Problem in Aboriginal Politics. In O.P. Dickason & D. Long eds. Visions of the Heart. Oxford University Press. 2011. (Ed.), Title of book (pp. first page-last page). City: Publisher.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    faith Bandler

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Faith Bandler uses a variety of rhetorical techniques in Faith, Hope and Reconciliation to portray her memorable message of equality. Bandler’s speech explores the prejudice that Aborigines had to endure, and encourages the reconciliation process to move faster. She opens her speech with separate acknowledgments to “the Indigenous people of Illawarra” and “Lord Mayor, Evelyn Scott, Linda Burney.” This highlights the division between races and subtly introduces her topic of reconciliation. She uses inclusive language to reveal “not what is in it for me, but what is in it for us”, and this is memorable as she is choosing not to divide, instead indicating the benefits of reconciliation to not just Indigenous Australians, but to all. This is unlike Noel Pearson, whose acerbic attack on John Howard’s politics was most memorable, sarcastically stating that Howard “might care to read Robert Hughes rather than the opinion polls” to “comprehend how we might deal with our history”. Bandler was an unwavering campaigner for equal rights in the 1960s, and was integral in making the 1967 Referendum a memorable success. She reminisces on how she and other activists had “lived, breathed, struggled... climbed”, where the cumulative listing emphasizes the hardships that Aborigines had to endure, as well as…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics