Preview

1996 Mt. Everest Disaster

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1401 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
1996 Mt. Everest Disaster
In 1996, a number of expedition teams ascended Mount Everest. During May, a storm hit Everest, causing lives to be lost. This event is now known as the 1996 Mount Everest disaster, and it brought changes to mountain climbing. Numerous individuals wrote about the events that occurred during this climb. Among these individuals was Jon Krakauer, a writer and member of Rob Hall’s expedition team, who provided his account of the events in his book Into Thin Air: A Personal Account of the Mt. Everest Disaster. Krakauer’s book was met with criticism from other climbers and mountaineers. His credibility was questioned as well because of the effects that high altitudes have on the human body. Perhaps the most critical of Krakauer was Anatoli Boukreev. …show more content…
Climbing to high altitudes has significant effects on the human body. Altitude sickness and hypoxia are extremely serious ailments that affect the brain and body. Not to mention that climbing a severe slope would cause exhaustion, which has poor effects on the mind too. Altitude sickness has been known to have symptoms such as vision problems, reduced awareness, shortened memory, poor judgement, lowered attention span, and changes in mood (“Altitude Effects on the Human Body”). If vision problems were affecting Krakauer, he may not have been seeing what he thought he was and therefore could have recorded events improperly. With reduced awareness and lowered attention span, Krakauer would have experienced difficulties in focusing and recognizing what was happening around him, again bringing question to whether the events he recorded were accurate. Krakauer himself stated that the altitude had made events, especially the times they occurred, hard to recall (Krakauer xvi). He had to check with other climbers about events during and after, to be sure he was accurately remembering what had transpired (xvi). Changes in mood and poor judgement could explain Krakauer’s characterization of Boukreev. If Boukreev was truly represented poorly in Into Thin Air, it could have been due to Krakauer having altitude sickness. Cerebral hypoxia is caused by high altitudes, like altitude sickness. Hypoxia occurs when there is a lack of …show more content…
His reliability has been questioned ever since his book was released. Anatoli Boukreev’s testimonies against Krakauer did not stifle this controversy, but rather fueled it. Questions regarding ethics, character portrayals, and state of mind arose. The other climbers that told their stories provided a new, unique perspective. Some of their stories corroborated Krakauer’s events, though others’ sided more with Boukreev. While the media and general public can speculate all they want about who was telling the true facts, what actually happened on that mountain, and who was responsible for the deaths that occurred, the only ones that know the real answers are those that took part of that 1996 Mount Everest

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Krakauer was one of the only people that understood McCandless and why he did what he did. I think this is in part because they are very similar people. Like McCandless, Krakauer loves the wilderness and through another book, Into Thin Air, tells the story of his climb of Mt. Everest. After McCandless is discovered dead in Alaska, Krakauer immediately writes an article about him and defending him against those who spoke negatively about him. He knows McCandless's story and wants to tell people, because it is meaningful. There was more to McCandless than meets the eye and Krakauer felt like it was his responsibility to make this…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Boukreev's Into Thin Air

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Anatoli Boukreev wrote this response in order to defend himself of the accusations that Krakauer mentioned in “Into Thin Air,” which he wrote for a magazine. Boukreev’s intention for writing was to justify and clarify the actions that Krakauer included in his report, since Boukreev believed that Krakauer was unjustly critical of his actions and decisions on Mount Everest, he wanted to argue for himself. Boukreev begins by establishing on what were his decisions and actions were based upon, which he claims was his experience. He states that he has climbed the Everest three times, and also that he has summited, approximately, 19 mountains over 8,000 meters in elevation without the use of supplementary oxygen. He includes this statement at the beginning of…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After searching the mountain for several hours, in search for Weathers, Krakauer becomes of course, in the middle of a terrible storm, and needs to get down the mountain safely; '"I was in deep s**t and the cavalry wasn't coming so I better do something about it myself'" (p 252). Ultimately, he knows that the other climbers are not capable of helping him, if were he to get stranded, and he knows that in order to stay as safe as possible, he will have to rely on himself. Although he does not conform to climbing protocol, Krakauer establishes several other smart decisions, while climbing Mount…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jon Krakauer

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To get a full perspective of the mountain and the commercialization, he requests to climb the mountain. A few months pass and his newspaper tell him he can climb Everest. Krakauer will be on the Adventure Consultants team from New Zealand. The mountain is separated into five camps, Base Camp, Camp One, Camp Two, Camp Three, and Camp Four. The team makes the climb well, and not many people are injured on the way up. On the descent a storm rolls in and causes issues with the people still on the top of the…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jon Krakuer

    • 3455 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Throughout the text, Krakauer attempts to figure out exactly what went wrong and what happened to whom. He does extensive research and painstakingly traces the actions of every climber on the mountain. He theorizes about the breakdowns of the expedition, and attributes the disaster to a series of small mistakes. He includes himself, and explicitly blames himself for at least one person's death. The experience affects him profoundly, and in addition to telling the story, the book focuses on how Krakauer is forever changed as a result of what happened.…

    • 3455 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Into Thin Air

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The author provides first hand account to support his claims as well as evidence that was provided by other survivors of his Everest group. Krakauer also gives brief history of Everest and previous successful expeditions.…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Into Thin Air Analysis

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Everest will devour all in its icy crevasses and leave one’s thoughts twisted, questioning why they came here in the first place. Into Thin Air, a journalistic view novel by Jon Krakauer, tells of the May 1996 tempest that ominously shadowed Everest, leaving all on the summit oblivious as the storm’s winds growl from a short distance below them. On May 11th when the storm attacks at its full strength, it would leave eight people dying during their summit attempt. Three guides, Rob Hall, Scott Fischer, and Anatoli Boukreev, automatically stood out because as guides one may feel they hold the full responsibility of this tragedy. Rob Hall, was a studied and cerebral person with a calm disposition, he professionally guided and climbed as a main guide for the Adventure Consultants. Scott Fischer was an American mountain guide for Mountain Madness, in which he founded. He was known for his ascents of the world’s highest mountains without…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Into Thin Air by Jon Krakaeur, the author’s word choice of descriptive passages and vivid words help well understand his perspective. You see this whole story is written in perspective Jon Krakauer is a journalist by trade, and his motive for going on the Everest expedition is to write an article about the experience of climbing as part of a commercial expedition. The perspective is in the first person, but with a journalistic viewpoint. Krakauer often seems removed from the subject, describing events as objectively as possible, as one would expect in a journalistic article. For example, he is sometimes critical of his fellow climbers, even though elsewhere he describes…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    altitudes such as Everest. He was very honest and admitted when he made a mistake. Krakauer struggled climbing and faced many challenges once the storm arrived. I honestly do not think he was trained enough to be climbing Mt. Everest. As an author, he was very detailed and made sure he knew all the facts about the people in the novel. He was also very sympathetic and told about all the guilt he had from the expedition. Krakauer writes, “My actions or failure to act played a direct role in the death of Andy Harris.” (Krakauer 284). He is a very professional writer and really makes you feel a part of the story. His wording was impeccable and I feel like he did not leave out any details. I loved how he was a very honest person while writing which made me have a lot of respect towards him. I relate to his honesty and bluntness. I personally am a blunt person when it comes to telling the truth. I tell it how it is even if it is not the right way to say it. For Krakauer to be able to write this novel after all the stuff he experienced in this disaster is unbelievable. He witnessed some very tragic things and for him to sit down and write it all out shows how determined he was to get the truth out. I honestly believe that he told his part of the story to the best of his ability. I do not think that he could have made it up. He also knew that the other survivors would read this book and would know if he did not tell the story correctly. Since he seemed very loyal I do not think he would have tried to make himself seem different than his real self. If he had in anyway tried to claim that he had no regrets about the expedition and what happened then I would be hesitant of the type of…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Into Thin Air is the book about the Mt. Everest disaster, the main character and narrator John Krakauer gets invited to come with Rob Hall’s expedition team, little did he know what he was getting him self into. The reader does not see alienation until almost the end of the book. Krakauer makes it to the top of the summit, keep in mind that he is the first one to reach the summit. Krakauer gets back to a camp before the nightfall, but other climbers were still up toward the summit or making the trek back to camp. Throughout the night is when the worst of the storm hits, when morning hits Krakauer finds himself all alone. Krakauer is almost non-existent in the rescue efforts, which affects his public image after the expedition comes…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Source 3

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Source 2, ‘Fearsome Tyrannosaurus rex Sue may have died from a sore throat’, and Source 3 ‘Everest the hard way’ are both non-fiction texts, but have different purposes for different audiences. Source 2 is a text written to inform readers of a new scientific discovery, who are newspaper readers interested in the subject. Source 3 is a non-fiction text, written to inform readers of a life changing experience, who read and are interested in stories of adventure.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Into Thin Air

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout the personal account novel Into Thin Air by Jon Krakauer, there are fierce qualities which has mainly transformed from whole climbers’ satisfactory. Loyalty and teamwork invent whole members on Everest to experience hardships. In spite of inexperienced clients’ limitation, guides keep on pushing themselves to achieve their purpose. Due to all members in this expedition participate with their full of passion and determination, guides reveals arrogance, even over clients’ limitation. Moreover, Hall’s knowledge about media players such as Jon Krakauer and Sandy Pittman cause lethal events.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At 1:15 a.m. I emerged from my tent with my boots laced, my ice-axe stowed, and my headlamp glowing. I was ready for this mountain, rearing to begin the ascent up its face. Before leaving base camp, my guide had a few words to share with the team. We gathered around him, and he began. “This will not be an easy climb,” he warned, “And not all of you will reach the summit. If you feel disoriented, I will send you down. If you are slowing, I will send you down. If you present a danger to yourself or to the team, I will send you down. If I tell you it is time, you will not object to my command. You will go down. Do you understand?” None of us had any intention of stopping. We spent weeks training for this climb and were certain that by midday we…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I want to know more about Zopa, the man who is helping Peak climb Mt. Everest. I know that he was a Sherpa, which are mountain people who live on the slopes of the Himalayas. He is also a Buddhist monk but has gotten permission to put aside his vows for a couple of weeks to help Peak. I like the way that the author wrote the book because it is very easy to understand what is going on. If I were Peak right now I would be so confused because so much is happening in such a small amount of time, and I’d be scared because I am afraid of heights and I don’t know if I would want to climb Mt. Everest. I can’t believe that Peak is so calm…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Do We Mean by Leadership

    • 18217 Words
    • 73 Pages

    In the spring of 1972, an airplane flew across the Andes mountains carrying its crew and 40 passengers. Most of the passengers were members of an amateur Uruguayan rugby team en route to a game in Chile. The plane never arrived. It crashed in snow-covered mountains, breaking into several pieces on impact. The main part of the fuselage slid like a toboggan down a steep valley, coming to rest in waist-deep snow. Although a number of people died immediately or within a day of the impact, the picture for the 28 survivors was not much better. The fuselage offered little protection from the extreme cold, food supplies were scant, and a number of passengers had serious injuries from the crash. Over the next few days, several surviving passengers became psychotic and several others died from their injuries. The passengers who were relatively uninjured set out to do what they could to improve their chances of survival. Several worked on “weatherproofing” the wreckage; others found ways to get water; and those with medical training took care of the injured. Although shaken by the crash, the survivors initially were confident they would be found. These feelings gradually gave way to despair as search and rescue teams failed to find the wreckage. With the passing of several weeks and no sign of rescue in sight, the remaining passengers decided to mount expeditions to determine the best way to escape. The most physically fit were chosen to go on the expeditions because the thin mountain air and the deep snow made the trips difficult. The results of the trips were both frustrating and demoralizing: the expedition members determined they were in the middle of the Andes mountains, and walking out to find help was believed to be impossible. Just when the survivors thought nothing worse could possibly happen, an avalanche hit the wreckage and killed several more of them.…

    • 18217 Words
    • 73 Pages
    Good Essays