Kelly Archer
Hawaii Pacific University
Dr. Satterfield
17 October 2010
Archer 1
The late nineteenth and early twentieth century saw a great deal of colonization of Asia and Africa by European powers, each trying to fulfill its own version of manifest destiny. England controlled vast holds in Africa, as well as India; the Belgians ruled the Congo; Germany, France, and Italy also held several African lands. These colonies funded a great part of the ruling countries' economies and provided foreign markets for European products, and expansion became necessary and desirable to advance the glory and the wealth of each European power.
However, the land available diminished as Germany, France, England, Italy, and Belgium occupied increasingly large tracts of land. Border disputes would break out often between colonists of different nationalities. One primary example would be the Boer War in South Africa, between the Dutch and the English. Furthermore, in the Middle East, the crumbling Ottoman Empire was alluring Austria-Hungary, the Balkans and Russia.
An arms race increased the hostile feelings among the European nations. Acknowledging that Germany was the leader in military organization and efficiency, the other great powers of Europe copied the universal conscription, large reserves and detailed planning of the Prussian system. Technological and organizational developments led to the formation of general staffs with precise plans for mobilization and attack that often could not be reversed once they were begun. The German von Schlieffen Plan, to attack France before Russia in the event of war with Russia, was one such complicated plan that drew more countries into war than necessary. Armies and navies were greatly expanded during this time period.
Archer 2
The standing armies of France and Germany doubled in size between 1870 and 1914. Naval expansion was also extremely competitive, particularly between Germany and Great Britain. By 1889, the British had established the principle that in order to maintain naval superiority in the event of war, they would have to have a navy two and a half times as large as the second-largest navy. It was clear that Europe was losing its strategical and operational effectiveness.
The Russo-Japanese War demonstrated how effective these battleships were. As Britain increased their output of battleships, Germany correspondingly stepped up their naval production, including the Dreadnought. Although efforts for worldwide disarmament were made at the Hague Conferences of 1899 and 1907, international rivalry caused the arms race to continue to feed on itself. Tangling alliances also developed whose purpose, ironically, lay in preventing the outbreak of war for conquest. German official Otto von Bismarck took advantage of Italian resentment towards France and created the Triple Alliance between Germany, Italy and Austria- Hungary in 1882.
In exchange for Italy's agreement to stay neutral if war broke out between Austria-Hungary and Russia, Germany and Austria-Hungary would protect Italy from France. However, after Bismarck was fired by Kaiser William II in 1890, the dislike of Slavs kept Bismarck's successors from renewing the understanding with Russia. France took advantage of this opportunity to get an ally, and the Franco- Russian alliance was formed in 1891, which became a formal alliance in 1894. The Kruger telegram William II sent to congratulate the leader of the
Archer 3
Boers for defeating the British in 1896. As a result, Britain and France overlooked all major imperialistic conflict between them and formed the “Entente Cordiale” in 1904.
Looking back at the settlement of the Congress of Vienna in 1815, the principle of nationalism was ignored in favor of preserving the peace. Germany and Italy were left as divided states, but strong nationalist movements and revolutions led to the unification of Italy in 1861 and that of Germany in 1871. Another result of the Franco-Prussian War of 1870-71 was that France was left with the loss of Alsace-Lorraine to Germany.
In conclusion, the “Napoleonic Wars” were a series of conflicts declared against Napoleon's French Empire and the rapidly changing sets of European allies by opposing coalitions that ran them from 1803 to 1815. These wars were a continuation of the wars sparked by the French Revolution of 1789, they revolutionized European armies and played out on an unprecedented scale. These “revolutionary” reforms of the French army led to combined arms division, the modern mass conscript army as a result of Jordan Law and Napoleon's introduction of the "corps d'armee” concept.
It is evident during this time period that French power rose quickly, conquering most of Europe, but collapsed rapidly after France's disastrous invasion of Russia in 1812. Napoleon's empire ultimately suffered complete military defeat resulting in the restoration of the Bourbon monarchy in France. The wars resulted in the dissolution of the Roman Empire and sowed the seeds of nationalism in Germany and Italy that would lead to the two nations' consolidation later
Archer 5 in the century. As a direct result of the Napoleonic wars the British Empire became the foremost world power for the next century.
Archer 6
Bibliography
Robert Citino. Quest for Decisive Victory: From Stalemate to Blitzkrieg in Europe, 1899-1940
(University Press of Kansas, 2002).
Gray, Colin S. Strategy for Chaos: Revolution Military Affairs (Frank Cass, 2003).
MacGregor Knox and Williamson Murray. The Dynamics of Military Revolution, 1300-2050 (Cambridge
University Pres, 2001).
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
- The Schlieffen Plan was Germany’s pre-war (1906) strategy in invading France in the event of an outbreak of war – aggressive and needed speed and surprise…
- 4241 Words
- 17 Pages
Good Essays -
During the late 1800’s, Europe was looking for a way to improve themselves as a whole. With growing population and a steady decline in available work, something new had to be done. Countries looked towards Africa to serve as new colonies for the Europeans in order to better their own countries. During the European acquisition of African colonies in the period 1880 to 1914 Europe’s attitude towards Africa was that Africa was the inferior race in comparison to the Europeans. With the help of a strong feeling of nationalism, Europeans were motivated to acquire new lands in order to improve their motherland’s power and economy with new available work.…
- 1131 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
In this essay, we will focus on the development of the events on The Western Front where Germany faced France. All the powers had thought and planned their war strategy very accurately.…
- 1335 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
The 19th century was one of the most important time periods that helped shape the world into what it is today. Western European powers, such as Great Britain, Germany, and France, strongly believed in the notion that in order to gain more dominant global power, they would have to conquer new lands across the globe and exploit the territories’ resources. Throughout the early and mid 1800s, the nations of Western Europe upheld imperialism, conquering and exploiting foreign lands in Asia and South America. Unfortunately, one major problem remained in the way of global imperialism; Africa, a continent rich in resources, could not be infiltrated because of strong resistance by the natives, foreign disease, and difficult terrain. Nevertheless, in the 1880s, Western Europe became more advanced and had the capability of conquering Africa; the scramble for Africa was on. In 1884-85, the Berlin Conference was held in Germany; this was a diplomatic meeting where the nations of Western Europe divided Africa among themselves. Each nation was given separate holdings in Africa, and the issue of land in Africa was solved. However, a major problem overlooked by the Europeans was that Africa had no say in the Berlin Conference. This resulted in many problems that would terrorize Africa for years to come; because Africans had no say in the dividing of their land, religious and political strife arose, and places such as the Congo faced detrimental and uninvited changes.…
- 893 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
occurred between the 16th and 18th centuries; European powers did not usually acquire territory in Africa and Asia but rather built a series of trading stations; the New World was the exception--many countries established colonies in the Americas; many Europeans also emigrated from their homelands…
- 1304 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Before the 1800s European nations had barely touched Africa, but when they learned about Africa’s raw materials they raced to gain a piece of the continent. In the beginning European nations just traded with Africa at coastal ports. Then they began exploring more of the continent. Belgium conquered the Congo. Britain took control of Egypt, what is now South Africa, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, and parts of eastern Africa.…
- 139 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The menace of the hostile division led to an arms race, another cause of World War One. Germany was the leader in a military organization and efficiency, the great powers of Europe copied the universal conscription and detailed planning of the Prussian System. The armies of France and Germany doubled in size between 1870 and 1914. Naval expansion was also competitive, particularly between Germany and Great Britain. British had established the principle that maintained naval superiority in the event of the…
- 491 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Britain, France, Germany, Russia, and the Netherlands continued to colonize during this era, but they also devised other ways to spread their empires. In the late 19th century Japan and the United States joined the European nations as an imperialist power.…
- 1439 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
European imperialism has shaped the world over and over many times, acquiring many colonies throughout the globe. The colonization of Africa was no different for the Europeans. The need for raw materials motivated Europeans to acquire new lands in order to provide resources for their industrialized economies. The strong sense of a burden to civilize and enlighten others became the perspective for the approach of colonization.…
- 538 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Russia also had a way bigger army than Germany. It would also take at least 6 weeks for Russia to get their army “ready.” {4} By that time, Germany would sure be ready with their army.{4} By Russia having a bigger army than Germany, Germany would want to gain more people for their army. Also, the armies of France and Germany more than doubled between 1870 and 1914.{3} The rivalry between them led to a building up of weapons and an increase distrust.{3}…
- 387 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Administrative policies were symbiotically integrated with militaristic endeavors. The German military had been deemed a "State within the State" with the General Staff's control over Parliament and politicians (World War I). Military competition, judged relatively between the major European powers, bolstered war capabilities and instilled a cultural paranoia. "It is also important to take notice of the fact that from 1910 to 1914, while France increased her [defense] expenditure by 10%, Britain by 13%, Russia by 39%, and Germany was the most militaristic as she increased by 73%." (World War I). Germany in particular sought to expand its navy with the 1900 Naval Law which doubled its inventory to 24 battleships however, the British always maintained naval superiority with its Dreadnoughts. British obsession with naval dominance was strong government rhetoric which exaggerated military expansionism. A simple naivety in the potential scale of unchecked aggression and bloodshed of a war stemmed from the conscription program and technology. A delusion of possible invincibility and expedient triumph soaked the ideology of each major European…
- 1196 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
European Nations wanted more land, power, and natural resources. They got this by conquering and colonizing new lands. Africa was not colonized, making the continent a prime area for colonization. Prior to the 19th century European nations only used Africa for its slave trade, therefore, only settling on the coasts. The driving forces behind these European conquests in Africa were caused by political, cultural, and economic reasons.…
- 405 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Throughout history, nations have tried to ‘compete’ with each other in almost every respect, trying to become the biggest world power. One way to do this is by developing colonies: this increases land supply as well as the abundance of resources, thus improving the economy. Africa was a generally underdeveloped continent with weak, decentralized political structures that could be easily conquered by western militaries, who wanted to colonize there to use the raw materials and human labor to improve their economy. While Belgians who were imperializing the Congo in the 19th century believed and justified their actions by saying they were helping the conquered peoples to advance and “catch up” to the West technologically and culturally, in reality…
- 1705 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The French and European powers wanted more direct control of their colonies during the 18th and 19th centuries than they did in the 15th and 16th centuries. This new period of Imperialism, led to the Europeans demanding more power over the political, economic, and social lives of all people. The Europeans looked at the Africans as not being able to handle the complex ideals of running a country. They wanted to make the land of Africa to have an economy that benefitted the European economy. They wanted the people already there to begin to follow their customs and traditions.…
- 505 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Arms Race was a race to build the biggest Army and Navy and Airforce for the Battle ahead. All countries except Britain and Germany were trying to Build the biggest army anyone had every seen where as Britain and Germany were trying to Build up there navy as Germany wanted the Biggest navy so as to beat Britain. In Germany they had a small army but people said that it, Even though one of the smallest, It was the best trained and most powerful out of all armies involved in World War One. In 1900 Russia had the biggest army with 1.1 million but by 1914 it had lost half a million to be an army of 0.8 million, all other countries except Britain had gained a bigger army. Count Alfred von Schlieffen created the Schlieffen plan and it was a plan that was supposed to protect Germany from fighting the war on two fronts. People were told that - 'Under this plan they would quickly attack and defeat France, then turn their forces on Russia which would be slow to get its troops ready for war' (Modern World History, P9). This Plan was a Failure to Germany as it had many Flaws, For example - Britain was not brought into the Equation and France was stronger than what they…
- 1184 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays