Though sexologists’ initial concepts of homosexuality did not match perfectly with the nature of romantic friendships, these concepts proved to be similar enough that those who felt threatened by the nature of romantic friendships could frame homosexuality in such a way that they could cast suspicion over the validity, normality, and morality of romantic friendships. Many romantic friends objected to this conceptualization even if they were sexually active within their relationships, such as when Emma Goldman disparaged lesbians in 1928 on the basis of their “antagonism to the male” despite her previous sexual relations with her romantic friend, Almeda Sperry. Still, to outsiders, the emotional intimacy and, within women’s romantic friendships specifically, independence of romantic friendships increasingly came to signify homosexuality; as the psychiatrist William Lee Howard wrote in his 1901 novel, The Perverts, “The female possessed of masculine ideas of independence…and that disgusting anti-social being, the female sexual pervert, are simply different degrees of the same class—degenerates,” (Faderman 47). No matter romantic friends’ objections, this view came to dominate society and make the process of maintaining a romantic friendship increasingly difficult and, therefore, less common. In 1928, Wanda Fraiken Neff noted this increased suspicion in her novel We Sing Diana, where “Intimacy between two girls” in her 1920 Vassar college setting is described as being “watched with keen distrustful eyes” (Faderman 35), which she highlights as being different from the attitude of less than a decade before. Romantic friends could even become suspicious of their own desires; even
Though sexologists’ initial concepts of homosexuality did not match perfectly with the nature of romantic friendships, these concepts proved to be similar enough that those who felt threatened by the nature of romantic friendships could frame homosexuality in such a way that they could cast suspicion over the validity, normality, and morality of romantic friendships. Many romantic friends objected to this conceptualization even if they were sexually active within their relationships, such as when Emma Goldman disparaged lesbians in 1928 on the basis of their “antagonism to the male” despite her previous sexual relations with her romantic friend, Almeda Sperry. Still, to outsiders, the emotional intimacy and, within women’s romantic friendships specifically, independence of romantic friendships increasingly came to signify homosexuality; as the psychiatrist William Lee Howard wrote in his 1901 novel, The Perverts, “The female possessed of masculine ideas of independence…and that disgusting anti-social being, the female sexual pervert, are simply different degrees of the same class—degenerates,” (Faderman 47). No matter romantic friends’ objections, this view came to dominate society and make the process of maintaining a romantic friendship increasingly difficult and, therefore, less common. In 1928, Wanda Fraiken Neff noted this increased suspicion in her novel We Sing Diana, where “Intimacy between two girls” in her 1920 Vassar college setting is described as being “watched with keen distrustful eyes” (Faderman 35), which she highlights as being different from the attitude of less than a decade before. Romantic friends could even become suspicious of their own desires; even