Preview

2 Ronald A Swoboda V Hero Decks copy

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
315 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
2 Ronald A Swoboda V Hero Decks copy
Ronald A. Swoboda v.
HERO DECKS, A Division of Parody Productions, LLC.
No. 2009-CA-1303.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.
March 31, 2010.

1. FACTS:
Parody Productions, LLC is a company that sale his playing cards over the internet. The product portrays well-known players from a sports team's history. The plaintiff in this suit, Ronald Swoboda, is included in the New York Mets Hero Deck. Swoboda claims that he has never given Parody permission to use his image. He further contends that through his attorney he sent Parody a cease and desist letter. Parody refused to stop selling cards with Swoboda's name and images. In response, Swoboda filed the instant lawsuit to enjoin Parody from the continued use of his name and likeness and for damages for violating his right to publicity, and, alternatively, damages for unjust enrichment. The trial court sustained the exception of lack of personal jurisdiction and this appeal followed. 2. ISSUE: The issue is “Did Court of Appeal of Louisiana approve lack of personal jurisdiction of an internet merchandiser?” 3. DECISION: Affirmed 4. REASONING:
Since 1945, technology has advanced to such a degree that it is possible for sellers to reach consumers in their homes worldwide. The onset of the Internet has created a lapse between the method of doing business in 1945 and the legal system's ability to keep up with technology. The "purposeful availment" requirement for the exercise of personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant ensures that it will not be haled into a jurisdiction solely as a result of a random, fortuitous, or attenuated contact, or by the unilateral activity of another party or a third person. In Quality Design, the court ruled that Tuff Coat's website was a passive one, whereby information about its product was provided, but actual sales were arranged via telephone or mail. The court found personal jurisdiction was lacking.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    ISSUE: (One or two sentences about what the case is trying to answer – should be in the form of a question). Were the actions of Mrs. Mitchell constituted misconduct under § 59-90-5(b), N.M.S.A.1953?…

    • 340 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law/421 Final

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    D. is invalid because although on its face it's an intrastate law, this statute will have a significant economic effect on interstate commerce causing an undue burden…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    PA110 Complaint Form 1

    • 707 Words
    • 4 Pages

    3. This court has subject matter jurisdiction over the claims presented in this complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because plaintiff is a resident of the State of Missouri and the defendant is a citizen of the State of Illinois and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, exclusive of fees and costs.…

    • 707 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    DialAmerica Marketing, Inc. is a telephone-marketing firm that operates in twenty states and maintains its principal place of business in Teaneck, New Jersey. A major aspect of DialAmerica's business is the sale of magazine renewal subscriptions by telephone to persons whose subscriptions have expired or ready to run out. They located subscribers' phone numbers by employing in-house researchers who would find numbers by consulting telephone books and calling directory-assistance or operators. The researcher would travel to DialAmerica's office in Teaneck and pick up cards, which contained the name and address of a subscriber whose telephone number was needed.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    PA205

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This court has subject matter jurisdiction over the claims presented in this complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because plaintiff is a resident of Illinois and the defendant is a citizen of Missouri and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, exclusive of fees and costs.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I. Subject Matter Jurisdiction: Does the federal court have the authority to hear the claim?…

    • 3692 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Swoboda Case Study

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ron Swoboda, a former member of the New York Mets baseball team, filed a lawsuit in the State of Louisiana over an internet merchandiser named Parody Productions, LLC selling novelty cards featuring famous baseball players including the plaintiff. This lawsuit is followed initial request of Swoboda to cease the sales which the merchandiser rejected. The trial court made a verdict in favor of the defendant, stating that the court does not have the personal jurisdiction over the defendant to sustain the case itself for trial, which resulted in this appeal in question.…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    a. What issue was address in the US Supreme Court cases of Baker v. Carr and Reynolds v. Sims and what phrase did they use to justify their decision? (523-24)…

    • 1007 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Legal Brief

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages

    8) The court correctly stated that the child’s welfare was the controlling factor, but the court…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cheeseman, H. R. (2010). The legal environment of business and online commerce: Business, ethics, e-commerce, regulatory, and international issues. (6 ed., p. 49). Pearson College Division.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gideon's Trumpet

    • 4806 Words
    • 20 Pages

    In this chapter the issue at hand involves the jurisdiction of the federal and state courts. What the Supreme Court can and cannot do. It is explained that the reach is limited to only federal laws. Stating that when a state has decided that a person acted in a way that violates state…

    • 4806 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The issue being presented in this case deals with whether or not it was unlawful for Joe Roberts to possess a machine-gun he built and displayed locally. Mr. Roberts knew it was illegal to buy a machine-gun so he built his own gun thinking it was legal because it never traveled interstate and he destroyed the mold he used to make the gun.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sandiganbayan Case Study

    • 24161 Words
    • 97 Pages

    The jurisdictional question is posed in this petition for certiorari assailing the Resolutions1 of the Sandiganbayan, Fifth Division, denying petitioner’s motion to quash the information and her motion for reconsideration.…

    • 24161 Words
    • 97 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Supplementary Material

    • 26454 Words
    • 106 Pages

    The issue or issues in the case are the legal questions that the Judge is being asked to resolve by the litigants.…

    • 26454 Words
    • 106 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Did International Shoe’s activities in Washington make it subject to personal jurisdiction in Washington courts?…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays