Preview

2000 Presidential Election 2000

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
677 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
2000 Presidential Election 2000
After careful consideration about the factors presented, I have decided that the 2000 presidential election between G.W Bush and Al Gore was illegitimate. My decision is based off of both the votes that were casted and those that were not. Firstly, focusing on the votes that were casted, there were many numbers that were either not or wrongly counted. The 175,000 undervotes that were supposably considered the ¨spoiled ballots” is one of these examples. The first factor that added to the illegitimacy of this election was the machine in Volusia county which “added 3,000 votes to Bush’s total and subtracted thousands of votes from Gore” [1]. This put Gore’s count in the Volusia county to -16,000. Thus, because of this machine failure, the actual …show more content…
Moreover, the Palm Beach County problem where many voters felt as if they voted for the wrong person also added to the illegitimacy to this election. Pat Buchanan himself stated that he believed “many of the votes casted for him were probably casted by mistake and were for Al Gore” [1]. Because of the design of the butterfly ballot, it may have cost Al Gore many votes. “Buchanan may have received over 3,000 votes that were intended for Al Gore” [1]. Not only did he lose votes because they were wrongly casted, but it was also stated in the movie that the ballot design itself cost him a minimum of 6,000 votes. Thus, the design of the ballot aided in the illegitimacy to the election because it caused confusion, thus votes were casted wrongly. Additionally, the biggest number that had the greatest effect on the illegitimacy of the 2000 election was the 175,000 undervotes. Ultimately, these votes were greatly affected by the design of the ballots. Since they were never counted, we can not say who for sure would of …show more content…
It was stated, “20,000 people were illegally disqualified from voting, almost half of them were African-American” [1]. Since they were never casted and do not have any effect on the overall results of the election, it is still an important factor to consider. 20,000 people were illegally turned away, meaning 20,000 votes were not casted based off wrong standards. These votes could have had an impact on the results. But because they were never casted, we will never know. The fact that they were illegally turned away is an additional aspect, in my perspective, that aids in the illegitimacy. Ultimately, there were various aspects that affected and could have affected the results of the election. Such as the design of the ballot, or the fact that people were illegally turned away, thus not casting votes. I believe that if the Supreme Court had not halted the recount in Florida, Al Gore would have won. It seemed more like a street fight between both parties then actually trying to figure out who deservingly won the election. With the factors and numbers presented, I have the assertion that the 2000 presidential election between G.W Bush and Al Gore was not

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ch. 10 AP Gov FRQs

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages

    B) The public wasn’t very engaged in any of these elections. They had a little part in who won those elections, for various reasons. Technology just wasn’t advanced, policies and natural resources were out of their hand, and recounting the ballots didn’t happen because time didn’t permit. In all these cases, it didn’t come down to what the public wanted, because it couldn’t.…

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Recount Movie Analysis

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This movie is more about the fundamental human right which was violated. In the movie Ron Klain stated that “the foundation of our democracy is based on the citizen right to vote it is our duty as Americans to fulfill that responsibility. Many people felt like their right to vote were violated. Some people thought that the Supreme Court ruled based on party, meaning that they let Bush win because he was a republican. It was unfortunate that the Supreme Court ruled that they should stop count the votes. It could have been better for Gore and Bush to be satisfied with the votes they…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ever since its creation at the Constitutional Convention in 1787, the Electoral College has been the most widely debated aspect in the Constitution. There have been over 700 proposed constitutional amendments aimed at fixing or abolishing this process. And Congress has on several occasions held highly publicized hearings on Electoral College reform but overall has remained fairly inactive (Best, p. vii). And while the Electoral College is a cornerstone of our Constitution and therefore a major aspect of American democracy and government, its very nature is quite unfair and undemocratic. Many of its aspects portray biases and favor certain groups of people and certain states. It is deemed archaic, undemocratic, complex, ambiguous, indirect, and dangerous by many scholars and is in direct need of reforming (Kura, p. 30). It especially contradicts Walter Stone’s instrumental voting model for the Electoral College at first makes one believe as if one’s vote counts but eventually one figures out that it is in fact quite unimportant (Stone, p. 51). For with the Electoral College, the people are not in charge but rather the system is – the Electoral College presidential election system that is.…

    • 4911 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In November 26, 2000 the election between Gore and Bush made history with their controversial electoral votes, it was total mayhem. The only reason why Gore didn’t win was because the Florida Supreme Court decided to stop counting the ballots and to just give Bush the presidential spot. Gore’s team took forever, they even passed the due date they were suppose to turn in the ballots. There was so little time to count all those ballots that weren’t completely punched out, the news and the people went insane, up to the point were they even had strikes, the people needed answers and a president as soon as possible. There was about 175,010 ballots that weren’t counted. Gore gained about half a million plus more popular votes than Bush did, and personally…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    First election since 1876 that had been disputed. Democrats had requested a manual recount from the Florida counties in question, however Republicans sued to prohibit these hand tallies. Republicans then requested set deadlines that potentially could turn away votes that may have come in for Gore, so Democrats sued to prohibit these. The case ended up at the US Supreme court, which stopped the recount and at that point, Bush had won.…

    • 2096 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Presidential Election was held November 7, 2000. In this election Republican George W. Bush barely lost the popular vote to Democrat Al Gore. Bush defeated Gore in the Electoral College. On election nigh, no clear winner emerged, usually they focus on New Mexico and Oregon but it remained to close so they put their attention on…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Electoral College is an institution that may have served a purpose 200 years ago when the founding fathers needed a system that would be met with approval by both large and small states. The Electoral College is a flawed method of electing our President that has created problems in previous elections and is likely to be the source of problems in the future. The Electoral College provides an undemocratic method of choosing our president that potentially undermines the will of the voters. Not only can a candidate be elected without actually winning the most votes, it puts our elections at the mercy of electors who don't always cast their vote as pledged. I intend to demonstrate that the problems inherent in this voting method far outweigh any benefits it may provide. Replacing the winner-take-all method of awarding electoral votes with a system such as proportional representation or eliminating the college altogether in favor of direct election is the best way to ensure a trouble-free and fair election…

    • 2120 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In December of 2000, the United States Supreme Court made a decision that ended the dispute about the 2000 presidential election in favor of George W. Bush. The Court ruled that the Florida Supreme Court 's method for recounting ballots was a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The reason for this was the lack of equal treatment of all the ballots cast in Florida. The Court also ruled that no alternative method could be established within the time limits set by Title 3 of the United States Code (3 U.S.C.), § 5 (Determination of controversy as to appointment of electors), which is December 12. Three concurring justices also…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the year 2000, prominent presidential candidates raced hectically against each other. The main two political parties chose Al Gore for the Democrats and George W. Bush for the Republicans. The phrase, "too close to call", squandered endlessly as the electoral college could not predict the future leader even on Election Night due to the fact that the margins were almost indistinguishable. Florida, the fourth largest electoral vote state, had a nail biting recount due to the ambiguity of the final results. Nonetheless, here contends the political and economic effects of the campaign, and the way the nation changed due to the decisions of the winner.…

    • 2036 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Democracy Dbq

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Electoral College is a group of Electors appointed by each state considering the sum of the amount of Senators and Representatives of each state, and their main job is to vote for the President representing the votes of all the qualified voters in the state (US Const. art. II, sec 1). Notwithstanding that they were supposed to represent the people of the votes in the state, the representatives of the Electoral College from each state gave all their votes to the candidate that gets the majority of votes from a person in the state (US Const. amend. XII). There are two cases in the history of a candidate for President getting a popular vote through the states, but losing the election because of the way the Electoral College works, in 1888 and 2000 (Lapsansky-Werner et al 182). This makes the Electoral College not quite fitting the democratic ideals, but the people’s vote still matter in some way.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the year1787, American politics was altered forever. The founding fathers decided that the average American citizens wouldn't suffice in deciding who will lead the nation. The Electoral…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As one of the most controversial elections in history, the 2016 presidential elections between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump marked another year where the popular vote did not coincide with the electoral vote. The fact that Trump won the election even after losing the popular vote by over one million votes, brought an already ongoing debate to the forefront: To keep the electoral college or not? Some critics believe that it creates an emphasis on largely populated states and others argue that low-populated states are given greater, unfair representation. Regardless, both arguments share a common thread: an inequitable representation. The electoral college should be abolished due to being undemocratic, over representing small states, and depriving third parties of a fair chance.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Electoral College Failure

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 2000, Al Gore, with 266 electoral votes, lost the election to George W. Bush with 271, despite having the popular vote by a margin of 543,895 votes. The electors in the Electoral College have been known, a few times, to be ‘faithless’ to what the people in their state voted for, and cast their vote toward a different candidate than they voted for. As recently as 1988, a Democratic Elector cast his votes toward Lloyd Benson to be President, and Michael Dukakis to be the Vice, when he was supposed to cast the other way around. If the people of the United States were truly represented by the Electoral College, then Al Gore would have been elected, due to popular vote; seeing the fact that Bush was the candidate elected in 2000, it just doesn’t add up. There’s no way, taking this information into consideration, that the Electoral College would properly represent that which the American people truly desire in an election…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I’m going to be talking about if we should eliminate the electoral college. On December 13, 2000, vice president Al Gore conceded the presidential election to Governor Bush. A day earlier, a lengthy and expensive manual vote recount process in Florida was stopped by the United States supreme court despite Bush leading by only 537 votes with Bush winning the states by 25 electoral votes put him over the needed threshold of 275. This election result was highly unusual not just because of Supreme Court decisions it was also the 4th time in united states history that a candidate had garnered majority of the popular votes but lost the election. As you all also have heard this type of scenario happened again with Hillary winning the popular vote…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who 's voting for the president? Not you. We live in a society where your vote…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays