Preview

235 Exam 2 Spring 2014 Wfor Students 1

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4685 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
235 Exam 2 Spring 2014 Wfor Students 1
235 Exam 2 Spring 2014

True/False
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.

____ 1. Punitive damages are intended to punish a wrongdoer and deter others.

____ 2. Self-defense is a defense to an allegation of assault or battery.

____ 3. To commit an intentional tort, one person must intend to harm a certain other person.

____ 4. A party cannot recover damages for severe emotional distress absent a showing of physical injury.

____ 5. Defamation is one person's use of another's name without permission.

____ 6. The public disclosure of private facts about a person is not an invasion of privacy if it is done without the person's knowledge or consent.

____ 7. Fraud occurs only when there is reliance on a statement of opinion.

____ 8. If it can be shown that a trespass to land was warranted, a complete defense exists.

____ 9. If it can be shown that a trespass to personal property was warranted, a complete defense exists.

____ 10. A failure to return personal property is conversion even if the rightful owner consented to the initial taking.

____ 11. Publishing false information about another's product is conversion.

____ 12. If an actor's conduct creates no risk, there is no negligence.

____ 13. To determine whether a duty of care has been breached, a judge asks how he or she would have acted in the same circumstances.

____ 14. Proximate cause exists when the connection between an act and an injury is strong enough to justify imposing liability.

____ 15. An assumption of risk defense does not require that a risk be voluntarily assumed.

____ 16. The doctrine of negligence per se applies if an event causing harm does not normally occur in the absence of negligence.

____ 17. Under the "danger invites rescue" doctrine, a person who tries to rescue another individual from harm is liable for any injuries to the individual.

____ 18. The extreme risk of an activity is a primary basis for imposing strict liability.

____ 19. A criminal case must be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    King’s attorney argued that the warrantless search and seizure of the evidence within the apartment violated his client’s fourth amendment rights. The attorney then filed a motion to suppress the evidence which he claimed was illegally obtained. The court found that the warrantless entry was justified due to exigent circumstances which the officers encountered when they approached the apartment. These circumstances included the strong odor presence of marijuana, failure to respond to the door, and the movement which sounded consistent with the destruction of evidence.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The previous Courts argue that since the officers had an arrest warrant for the petitioner, it justified their searching of the home.…

    • 4749 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort Law Case Study Essay

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This tort is classified as trespass to realty under four circumstances, one being when a person intentionally stays on the land of another when the owner tells him to depart (Kubasek, pg. 115). Analyzing the case it is clear that Chandler had asked the members to leave. However, the students did not obey which makes them have the possibility of being accused of trespass. Not only is a trespasser on someone’s personal property but, the trespasser is liable for damages she or he might cause as well (Kubasek, pg. 115). Since Steel and the other members used the properties book case and used it to break down Chandler’s door all of them are liable for the damages caused to both the door and the bookcase. Negligent torts involve failure to exercise reasonable care to protect another’s person or property (Kubasek, pg. 117). When comparing that definition to this case it is clear that negligence does not correspond with the elements of this case. In conclusion with the evidence involved it can be understood that Chandler had not control over this situation and had no way of knowing how to prevent this from…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Opinion. Hug, Circuit Judge. A plaintiff may recoverdamages for emotional distress caused by observing the negligently inflicted injury of a third person if, but only if, said plaintiff: (1) is closely related to the injury victim; (2) is present at the scene of the injury-producing event at the time it occurs and is then aware that it is causing injury to the victim; and (3) as a result suffers serious emotional distress--a reaction beyond that which would be anticipated in a disinterested witness and which is not an abnormal response to the…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Therefore, if deadly force is used to prevent the escape of all felony suspects, then…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    case analysis

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Description: The defendant has to make an intentional act towards the plaintiff by either a harming or offensive physical act. Have to foresee the results.…

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    another person or intent to inflict an injury likely to cause death in order to establish…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    |reasonable person would exercise AR |219 [actus reus + reckless disregard|bodily harm, OF of death or bodily harm) MR |…

    • 4696 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to the book, the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress can be defined as an extreme and outrageous act, intentionally committed, that results in severe emotional distress to another. To be actionable (capable of serving as the ground for a lawsuit), the conduct must be so extreme and outrageous that it exceeds the bounds of decency accepted by society. Business Law Today, 10th Edition, pg. 99.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case established negligence as a wrongful act for which there was a legal liability.…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Does the law of proximate cause apply in these circumstances to determine that the defendant is liable for negligence?…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to predict the outcome of Mildred and her neighbor’s case, the law needs to be brought into the picture. It states in the Ohio Code Section of 2305.04, that it requires the trespasser, which is Mildred’s neighbor, to file his claim against Mildred within 21 years of the date of adverse possession. Mildred’s neighbor needs to prove that he has met the elements of adverse possession, as stated by Busziewicz v. Damion, 140 Ohio App. 3d 126, 130 (Ohio Ct. App., Cuyahoga County, 2000: 1. Possessor must have entered the property and have had exclusive use and possession of the…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The person so acting must intend to bring about the consequences or appear to have intended to bring about the consequences.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wilson vs Pringle

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Held - An intention to injure was not an essential ingredient of an action for trespass to the person, since it was the mere trespass by itself which was the offence and therefore it was the act rather than the injury which had to be intentional. However, the intentional act, in the form of an intentional touching or contact in some form, had to be proved to be a hostile touching, and hostility could not be equated with ill-will or malevolence, or governed by the obvious intention shown in acts like punching,…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law of Negligence

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Through civil litigation, if an injured person proves that another person acted negligently to cause his injury, he can recover damages to compensate for his harm. Proving a case for negligence can potentially entitle the injured plaintiff to compensation for harm to their body, property, mental well-being, financial status, or intimate relationships. However, because negligence cases are very fact-specific, this general definition does not fully explain the concept of when the law will require one person to compensate another for losses caused by accidental injury. Further, the law of negligence at common law is only one aspect of the law of liability. Although resulting damages must be proven in order to recover compensation in a negligence action, the nature and extent of those damages are not the primary focus of negligence cases.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics