Preview

3 generic strategy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
591 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
3 generic strategy
Michael porter developed 3 generic strategies: cost leadership, differentiation and focus. They are developed to create a defendable position in the long-run, outperforming competition and establish a competitive advantage. However does the generic strategy lead to sustainable competitive strategy? This analysis will explain in detail.
Cost leadership means setting out to become the low-cost producer of its industry. Each industry is different and provides with diverse problems. Cost leadership can come from many different forms such as: pursuit of economies of scale, proprietary technology, preferential access to raw materials and other factors. The emphasis is on lower costs, not on low selling prices. For a cost leader to be effective it is imperative that it needs to exploit all sources of cost to its advantage. If a firm can execute this it will automatically sustain overall cost leadership and therefore outperform in its industry and dominate prices. In a differentiation strategy a firm intention and desire is to be unique in its industry. “It selects one or more attributes that many buyers in an industry perceive as important, and uniquely positions itself to meet those needs” (Michael E Porter). This distinctive uniqueness is rewarded by a premium price that the firm can set. Been differentiation doesn’t have to be substantial. It can be as simple as having the best customer service. Differentiation may lead to profitability but doesn’t always guarantee the lead in the market share. Focus strategy emphases on a selected segment or group of segments within the industry and adapts its strategy to serving them to the exclusion of others. This focus strategy has two variants; cost focus and differentiation focus. Cost focus deals when a firm wants a cost advantage in its market. Differentiation focus deals with seeking differentiation within its target segment.
A generic strategy does not lead to sustainable competitive advantage. This is because the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rize Documentary

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Two basic strategies: product differentiation or cost leadership (firm’s may follow some combinations of these)…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    capsim strategies

    • 2515 Words
    • 9 Pages

    A Broad Cost Leader strategy maintains a presence in all segments of the market. The company will gain a competitive advantage by keeping R&D, production and material costs to a minimum, enabling the company to compete on the basis of price, which will be below average. Automation levels will be increased to improve margins and to offset second shift/overtime costs.…

    • 2515 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    BUSI690 Rothaermel Ex 2

    • 1990 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The drawbacks and risks of a cost-leadership strategy are that new entrants may erode the low-cost leader’s margins because of the “loss in market share while it attempts to learn new capabilities” (Rothaermel, 2013, p. 154). Also, the converse of the differentiation strategy issue applies, in that organizations need to ensure that the “focus of competition shifts from price to non-price attributes” (Rothaermel, 2013, p. 154). The organization needs to also be careful not to allow the value of the product or service to fall below the low-cost at which the product or service is offered (Rothaermel, 2013).…

    • 1990 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A cost leadership strategy is where a business aims to be the lowest cost manufacturer within its industry. The products are the basic, no-frills type with fewer features, perhaps lower quality and using low-cost packaging.…

    • 6112 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Strategic Business Analysis

    • 2788 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Michael Porter (1980) introduced the model of sustaining competitive advantage by market-led strategies. According to his model, there are three strategies such: cost leadership, differentiation or focus this is probable to sustain the competitive advantage (Graph 2,). On the other hand, some say that these strategies are doubtful. As with Porter 's Generic…

    • 2788 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Blue

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages

    19. The text discusses three approaches to combining overall cost leadership and differentiation competitive advantages.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    9/11 Case Study

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Porter, Michael E. ‘The Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy’. Harvard Business Review. January 2008. Pg. 78-93…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Academy of Management Executive , 9 (3), 45-57. Grant, R. M. (2010). Contemporary Strategy Analysis. London: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Lynch, R. (2003). Corporate Strategy (Third Edition ed.). New York: Prentice Hall Financial Times. McGahan, A. M. (2004). How Industries Change. Harvard Business Review , 82 (10), 86-94. Miller, D. (1986). Configurations of strategy and structure: Towards a synthesis. Strategic Management Journal , 7 (3), 233-249. Osgeowitsch, T., & Goelz, M. (2011). ALDI in Australia. University of Melbourne , 13. Parnell, J. A. (1997). New evidence in the generic strategy and business performance debate: A research note. British Journal of Management. , 8, 175-181. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy . Free Press. Porter, M. E. (1996). What is Strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74 (6), 62. Porter, M. E. (2008). The Five Forces that Shape Strategy. Harvard Business Review , 86 (1), 78-93.…

    • 4432 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    Porter, M (2008) the Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy, Harvard Business Review, January. 2008…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    This report consults literature from a range of academic resources in order to provide an understanding of strategy, strategic management and how firms achieve and sustain a competitive advantage. The paper will focus on Generic strategies implemented by firms in industry, low cost and differentiation.…

    • 3917 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Argyres, N. & McGahan, M. A., 2002. Introduction: Michael Porter 's "Competitive Strategy". The Academy of Management executive, 16(2), pp. 41-42.…

    • 2747 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aramark Analysis

    • 8484 Words
    • 34 Pages

    PORTER, M., 2008. The Five Competitive Forces that Shape Strategy. Harvard Business Review. pp. 78-93.…

    • 8484 Words
    • 34 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Kodak's Challenge

    • 4856 Words
    • 20 Pages

    On January 1st 1881, George Eastman and Henry A, Strong formed a partnership that they did not know would create one of the most legendary marks on the photography market today. Beginning with a simple company of dry plates, Eastman did not want any stone unturned when it came to the photography industry. Ament, P. (2006, October 9)…

    • 4856 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Generic strategy described by Porter (1985) is being used to describe the competitive strategy while supportive corporate and value chain strategies also discuss that help to strengthened strategic competitive choice of Mark & Spencer.…

    • 5922 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The first step is to clarify existing and prospective strategies. It is arranged at beginning because all the researches of potential partners will be based on its own characteristics. To choose strategies, Porter’ Generic Strategies is suitable as a tool. Generally it is a theory about choosing among 4 strategies which are Cost Leadership, Differentiation, Cost Focus and Differentiation Focus to get sustainable competitive advantages (Porter 1969).…

    • 1225 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays