Preview

360 Evaluation

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1845 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
360 Evaluation
Kenny Jones
SCM2601-W01-45955 Final Exam
J.J. Schultz
May 1, 2013

I. 360-Degree Evaluation

1. Explain the concept of the 360-Degree Evaluation.

The 360-Degree Evaluation or 360-Degree feedback system is a performance evaluation system. This evaluation system is considered 360-degrees because it involves the collecting of performance information from an employee’s sphere of contact. This includes evaluations from direct peers and co-workers, managers and supervisors, and unlike most reviews also from subordinates, making this a circular system. This system is most useful when used to develop employees. When used as a developmental program, employees tend to be more honest when giving feedback toward others and themselves. The system can provide feedback to the employees about how co-workers up and down the work force view their performance compared to their own self-perceptions. This type of information is complicated to obtain and often better completed by third party software for this purpose. Next the supervisor will set up a time to review the findings with the employee. It is at this time the employee can discuss what is being observed. Reports include all competencies being observed by the survey, favorable and unfavorable. To improve future performance, the supervisor creates a plan with clear objectives for career development. The supervisor’s role does not conclude with these giving out objectives. Further involvement with each employee must be maintained throughout the evaluation cycle. This support allows the employee to feel secure that company cares about them, which in turn, improves employee performance, bringing positive results to company.

2. What are the advantages of the 360-Degree Evaluation methodology and why?

There are several considerable advantages to the 360-Degree system. One advantage is the removal or decrease of bias from a few superiors. As the number of inputs increase, a heavy bias

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mgt 311

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A Company has initiated a series of self-assessments to aid in the management of its employees. The assessments were randomly picked by the employees and the management team did not influence the choices made by each employee. Each assessment was reviewed by the management team and the following information will be used to improve the work output and job satisfaction for each employee.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bsbwor501 Goal 1

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Assessment. As they work to learn and share information, employees should feel more trust and empowerment in their jobs, resulting in less resistance to change and new directions. New opportunities for advancement and collaboration may appear, along with more appreciation and collaboration across departments.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This uses observations from many aspects of a person in many roles. Cascio, (2013). The immediate supervisor or manager, co-worker and customers rate the employee through feedback form the performance of that individual that is observed. This will assist with any self-evaluation error and the feedback from different areas will give a 360 view of the individual, this will assist in understanding how the employee is effective in their role. Observant views with others assist in keeping a fair and objective view of employees; this will also assist in continuing a fair and objective review process.…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    These self-assessments will give the employees the opportunity to provide a realistic description of their major accomplishments, job satisfaction, and emotional influence as well as how they make decisions related to their performance. In a self‐assessment, the employee can describe their major contributions and how they accomplished or did not accomplish their performance expectations. These may also be referred to as personal evaluation surveys.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Police Training Process

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The assessment process includes five steps: Select criteria, Choose a research design, Choose measures, Collect data and Analyze data and interpret results (Spector, 2012) The Kirkpatrick Model has been around since the 1950’s and proves to be one of the most useful tools in business today for this very purpose. The Kirkpatrick Model is a simple four-level process that begins with level one, which is the results level: SDPD and DOD used feedback questioners to obtain whether the consensus of the training was effective or not. Level two is learning phase where SDPD and DOD turned to on the job assessments and supervisor reports to evaluate the degree of learning gained from the training. Level three is behavior; it is important to assess this level thoroughly to determine if the behavior patterns learned from the training are being utilized and that the employee is not resulting back to previous behavioral patterns. A self-assessment is most commonly used for this level. Lastly level four consists of the results segment of the evaluation, this is by far the most important and crucial level of all. Financial and production reports are generated that ultimately show the effectiveness of the training. Reports such as forecasting and measuring costs, forecasting and measuring benefits and calculating return on investment (ROI). If these reports do not show satisfactory results…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The general function of performance management systems in organizations is for employers to manage employees’ performance and development by providing individual feedback on their performance evaluation to identify and plan measurable areas for personal development to ensure the organization’s strategic goals are being met (DeCenzo and Robbins, 2007). For years, many organizations provided appraisal type performance reviews to their employees that ranked them against other employees. This type of ranking system is problematic, as it is unfair to compare employees from different departments who’s primary goals may be different from one another and can viewed as putting down employees who may be unable to put in as many hours or as much effort as others who have only one set project at a time and can bog down to set higher numbers. If employee development is not properly measured and managed, the organization may find it difficult to meet their strategic goals. This in turn can create complications between mainstream workers and management, as well as the company, and their customers.…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Life of Alex Sander

    • 1435 Words
    • 6 Pages

    360 degree feedback system as a performance evaluation tool as long as the understanding of its intent is understood. “There are three key steps in the successful implementation of 360 degree feedback systems in an organization. The three steps are that it must fit the organizations culture, make it psychometrically sound, and used with care” (“Best Practices”, 2012). It is also important to train the feedback providers to be sensitive, respectful and polite. Treating employees in a friendly and respectful manner and offering constructive advice will make them more open to accepting the performance appraisal system.…

    • 1435 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This usually means an individual being rated by peers, supervisors and sometimes clients, as well as doing self-assessment. All indications are that 360-degree appraisal in one form or another is probable to be used more extensively – it is not some provisional fad.…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dan McCarthy of the Whittemore School of Business Economics shares some best practices for getting the most value from a 360-degree leadership assessment. In employee-owned businesses, an alignment of goals and priorities is vital and desired. The leadership should be interested in an assessment of their performance. Leadership in these companies may be unorthodoxly defined because it may include culture leadership and not only corporate leadership. What is a 360-degree assessment? It is a process in which employees receive confidential, anonymous feedback from the people who work around them. This typically includes the employee's manager, peers and direct reports. It is an effective way to get feedback, often against a set of pre-defined leadership competencies. Here are McCarthy's 10 top tips for getting the most value from a 360-degree leadership assessment: 1. Mentally prepare yourself Prepare yourself to accept the feedback positively, as the next step to becoming a better leader. 2. Don't try to figure it out yourself Discuss the results with a coach, colleague or a mentor. If you are using an organization to administer the assessment, use their assistance in evaluating the results. It is too easy to miss something important or to misread something. We sometimes see what we want to see, are too hard on ourselves or make assumptions that others would not make. 3. Don't play detective When one is too close to the data, human nature will often cause us to want to determine who submitted the information which is submitted anonymously. With the exception of the manager, the reporting is designed to protect anonymity. 4. Holistically or systematically? Leaders have different personality types. Some prefer to take a holistic approach to the results by…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Morgan Stanley Case Analysis

    • 3374 Words
    • 14 Pages

    1. What are the key elements of MS 360° performance evaluation process? The Morgan Stanley 360° performance evaluation process is comprehensive and includes the following key elements: 1. Self-Assessment 2. 360° Feedback from superiors, peers, subordinates and internal clients 3. Specific evaluation criteria based on four broad categories A. Market/Professional Skills B. Management and Leadership C. Commercial Orientation D. Teamwork/One Firm Contribution 4. Office of Development to consolidate data into Year-End Data Packet 5. Evaluation Director to interpret and synthesize information to prepare Evaluation and Development Summary 6. Template for Performance Review Discussion The self-assessment was completed annually by each employee in conjunction with the 360° feedback. It was meant to compliment the information in the 360° feedback and was also used as a means for self-reflection. It was broken down in 3 sections as follows: 1. Business Goals & Accomplishments 2. Contribution to Morgan Stanley, division, and external/industry-related community 3. Professional Development The first 2 sections were open-ended, while the final section consisted of a series of short answers. The short answers were similar to the ones asked on the 360° feedback forms (both short and long), and thus served as a good proxy to compare whether the individual had a good self-perception of his or her qualities. For examples, all forms asked for the top 3 strengths and weaknesses. For the 360° Feedback, each evaluatee’s was required to provide a list of potential evaluators. Each employee was required to identify people with who they regularly interacted and would be able to provide relevant feedback. These reviewers were then included on a list called the Evaluation Request Form (ERF). Each reviewer was categorized in one of 4 categories based on the nature of the working relationship to the evaluatee: 1.…

    • 3374 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This method is very popular in government departments to appraise IAS officers and other high level officials. In this method the senior or the boss writes a report about the junior giving him details about the performance about the employee. The +ve and – ve traits, responsibilities handled on the job and recommendations for future incentives or promotions. The report is kept highly confidential and access to the report is limited.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    360 degree feedback, also known as 'multi-rater feedback', is the most comprehensive appraisal where the feedback about the employees’ performance comes from all the sources that come in contact with the employee on his job.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    360 º performance evaluation system is a multi source feedback model for evaluating the performance of the employees within a company. The main purpose of this system is to develop the employees, not to use it for the administrative purposes as promotion, firing, and compensation package. The feedback is received from the direct manager, customers, peers and subordinates. Also, the self-evaluation of the employee is taken into consideration.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    developin leaders

    • 2683 Words
    • 11 Pages

    and behaviors are influenced by the practices of their leaders. This line of reasoning would…

    • 2683 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    720 degree feedback

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages

    „720 degree performance appraisal‟, is the latest appraisal method that has been introduced in New Economy companies. Accurately and objectively measuring the performance of an employee is the most difficult part of the Performance appraisal process. Different methods are used for Performance appraisal that includes: Critical incident method, weighted checklist method, paired comparison analysis, graphic rating scales, essay evaluation method, behaviorally anchored rating scales, performance ranking method, Management by Objectives (MBO) method, 360 degree performance appraisal method, Forced ranking and Behavioral observation scales. 720 degree performance appraisal is an integrated method of performance appraisal where, the performance of an employee is evaluated from 360 degrees (Management, Colleagues, Self and also customers) and timely feedback is given and performance is evaluated again based on the targets that are set. Hence, 720 degree performance appraisal can be stated as twice 360 degree performance appraisal: once when the appraisal is done and the targets are set and he second where the feedback is given and the boss gives tips to achieve the goals. Hence, there is a pre and a post round of feedback.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays