Preview

4th amendment

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
347 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
4th amendment
Probable Cause:
Probable cause is the legal standard by which a police officer has the right to make an arrest, conduct a personal or property search, or obtain a warrant for arrest. While many factors contribute to a police officer’s level of authority in a given situation, probable cause requires facts or evidence that would lead a reasonable person to believe that a suspect has committed a crime.
Common examples of probable cause include the sight or smell of contraband in (plain view or plain smell), or an admission of guilt for a specific crime. The presentation of any of these facts would allow an officer to perform a search and make an arrest.
Be aware that minor traffic violations (e.g. speeding, broken tail-light or expired registration) are not considered probable cause.
What probable cause means to you
While there are certain situations where police need a warrant to search you or your property — during a traffic stop, police only need probable cause to legally search your vehicle.
The major exception to the probable cause requirement for vehicle searches is consent. Most vehicle searches don’t occur because police have probable cause. They occur because people get tricked or intimidated into consenting to search requests.
Consenting to a search request automatically makes the search legal in the eyes of the law. And the 4th Amendment doesn’t require officers to tell you about your right to refuse. So if you’re pulled over, don’t try to figure out whether or not the officer has probable cause to legally search you. You always have the right to refuse search requests by stating, “Officer, I don’t consent to any searches.” Repeat, if necessary.
If you refuse consent but the officer searches you anyway and finds illegal items, your lawyer can file a motion to suppress — or throw out — the evidence in court. If the judge agrees that the officer’s search violated the 4th Amendment’s probable cause requirements, she’ll grant the motion. Unless the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In schneckloth, the argument that voluntary consent could not be valid unless the D knew that he/she had a right to refuse the request to being searched was rejected because the court believes that the gov. does not need to establish the reasonableness of effective consent. Just as it wouldn’t be practical to enforce the consent search the requirement’s details of an effective warning it would also be unreasonable for officers to always inform the people they are detaining that they are able to leave before the consent to search was…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Police may search a vehicle incident to a recent occupant's arrest if it is reasonable to believe the vehicle contains evidence of the offense of arrest. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 at 351.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Other conditions on the searches incident to arrest exception include the use of force, the search of other individuals with the arrested individual, searching the vehicle of an arrest person, contemporaneousness and inventory searches "if a government agent has probable cause to believe the vehicle contains contraband or evidence of a crime without a warrant" because "in the time it would take to get a warrant, the car, driver and contraband or evidence could be long gone" (Harr, Hess, 2006. p. 231). The 1981 case of Robbins v. California saw the justifications for searching without a warrant. Those specifications include that the mobility of vehicles produce exigent circumstances.…

    • 310 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Perhaps, there is no clearly defined definition of probable cause. However, there are many relevant cases that have been tried and have established guidelines for the determination of what can be construed as probable cause. Two of these are Dumbra v. United States and Brinegar v. United States. The case 1925 case of Dumbra v. United States, the court consented that in order for a search warrant to be granted, the officer who is making the request merely needs to have “reasonable grounds at the time of his affidavit” (Cornell, 2006). The 1949 case of Brinegar v. United States, clearly announces that Probable cause is to be determined according to “the factual and…

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Benchmark

    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1. Yes, the search of the vehicle was lawful. The officer smelled marijuana while Ross rolled down the window, during a routine traffic stop, giving the officer probable cause to search the vehicle. The probable cause was based on the officers’ personal observation. “Police officers may use their personal training, experience, and expertise to infer probable cause from situations that may not be obviously criminal.” (Gaines 160) The officer then found a pound of marijuana giving probable cause for arrest.…

    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    be searched, and the persons or things to be seized (Cornell University Law School, No Date).” The first part of this section states that no warrant will be given unless there is probable cause that will lead the judge or magistrate to believe that there is a very good reason to invade the privacy of a citizen. If there is not enough evidence for the judge to justify the signing of a search warrant, then the officer needs to try and find more evidence that will bolster his or her case.…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A warrant is a legal document authorizing a search and seizure. A warrant is obtained from a judge or magistrate, who must be given sworn statements about the reasons for the search and seizure. The warrant must specify where the search will occur and what will be seized. The legal standard for issuing a search warrant is probable cause, which is a reasonable belief known personally or through reliable sources, that a specific person has committed a crime.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    P1 FINISHED

    • 598 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A police officer has powers to stop and search you if they suspect you are carrying; Illegal drugs, a weapon, stolen property, something that can be used to commit a crime e.g. a crowbar.…

    • 598 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The concept of search warrants, probable cause, and searches go hand in hand as part of the legal system. Each step makes the next step part of the process. This process gives us certain civil liberties and are all rooted in the 4th Amendment of the Constitution of The United State of America. The following information will interpret, define, and support the legal justification of warrants, probable cause, and searches.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Search Warrants

    • 2241 Words
    • 9 Pages

    A search warrant must always be based on probable cause. We can define probable cause by facts or circumstances that would lead a person to believe that the place needs to be searched for important pieces of evidence to be found (Swanson 35). The probable cause is established by what is called a written affidavit prepared by the law enforcement officer or investigator. In the affidavit, the officer states all known facts and circumstances involving the suspects and items that are expected to be found. An affidavit contains 3 main parts that need to be described: the person, the property, and the facts. The search warrant must always describe in particular the place that is being searched. The description must be detailed enough to where the place being searched can easily be distinguished from any other place. It can be very easy to confuse one property with another; this is why it is extremely important for the description of the building to be very detailed and accurate.…

    • 2241 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Numerous individuals have a vast misconstruing on the variations between Probable Cause and Reasonable Suspicion. Why is it important for people to understand the differences between these two important concepts? Understanding the differences between the two is essential on the grounds that one will result in a lawful search and the alternative will cause an unlawful search and seizure. As a quick definition, according to the textbook, Probable Cause is a law enforcement officer’s belief that supported by evidences and circumstances, that a crime has been, is being, or will be committed (Harr, Hess, Orthmann, & Kingsbury, 2015, p. 205). Whereas, Reasonable Suspicion can be considered to be more of an inclination a law enforcement officer will get (Harr, Hess, Orthmann, & Kingsbury, 2015, p. 237). Reasonable Suspicion is employed when conducting an investigative stop; conversely, Probably Cause is required to arrest or place a suspect into custody (Harr, Hess, Orthmann, & Kingsbury, 2015, p. 237). An officer must have both Probable Cause and Reasonable Suspicion to conduct a stop and frisk. Officers are taught this during their time in…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many people do not know their rights, most people do not even know the English language, and they are usually intimidated and target by the police when they pull them over. The fourth amendment does prohibit police officers from detaining pedestrians and conducting any kind of…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    A justifiable search could have many factors that would allow an officer to conduct a proper search or make a lawful detention and stops. One of them is a search warrant, which carries a limited authority to detain persons present and also search the property detailed on the warrant. Another is a criminal profile; an example would be of a drug dealer that would fit the physical description given to the officer. Anonymous tip, multiple informant’s, an example is like two or more persons able to identify someone that has committed a crime, and of course police observation. However if the officer sees something suspicious he/she has to articulate why such person has broken the law and given him/her probable cause to do a warrantless search or detention on such said person. Scope falls in the actual process of the search, meaning that you could only reasonably search with in the search area, an example that my teacher Mr. Enos discussed in class, was if your searching for alcohol in a vehicle then you could only search were alcohol could be reasonably hidden inside a car. Place refers to a public or private area, an…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    4th Amendment rights

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Fourth Amendment right also allows for warrantless searches for LEO’s. A warrantless search is granted when probable cause is met for a lawful arrest or if there is exigent circumstances which arise. Exigent circumstances are when a LEO must react immediately due to the defendant’s actions; like destroying evidence. If a LEO has probable cause to arrest someone, then the LEO has the authority to conduct a warrantless search of their persons for illegal contraband. Another example, if a LEO conducts a lawful traffic stop and upon approach has the plain smell of an…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    4th Amendment protects your right against unreasonable search and seizure of property, papers, or people without valid probable cause…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays