Preview

4th Amendment: Supreme Court Case

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
561 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
4th Amendment: Supreme Court Case
4th Amendment The Fourth Amendment is a very important element of the United States Constitution. This Amendment has been the solutions to several Supreme court cases, such as Terry v. Ohio, Cupp v. Murphy, and Florida v. Jardines. This amendment also codifies various statutes. Terry v. Ohio (1968) was a court case led by a conflict between a group of men and Officer McFadden. Officer McFadden was patrolling downtown Cleveland, when he noticed a group of men suspiciously wandering around. He decided to observe them. After, he watched them for a period of time. Officer McFadden decided to approach them, and introduced himself and asked their identification. The officer grabbed Terry and began to pat him down, until he found a pistol. The group of men were arrested. The question addressed in this court case was whether “stop and frisk” is constitutional or not. The Supreme court decided it was constitutional, only when the police is to be committed if the suspect is not stopped, and frisk is considered constitutional when the police believe they suspect is armed or dangerous. In Cupp v. Murphy (1973) The question addressed was whether scrapping under an arrestee’s fingernails was constitutional of not. The court case that led to this was the …show more content…
N.p., n.d. Web. 23 Mar. 2017.

"Cupp v. Murphy Case Brief." The Law School Authority. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 Mar. 2017.

"Florida v. Jardines." Oyez itt chicago-kent college of law. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 Mar. 2017.

"2013 Texas Statutes :: CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE :: TITLE 1 - CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE :: CHAPTER 18 - SEARCH WARRANTS." Justia Law. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 Mar. 2017.

Graham Thayer Williamson IIDUI / DWI Attorney Dallas, TX free consultation Message Reveal Number214-824-9461. "Texas Search and Seizure." Guides - Avvo. N.p., 09 Oct. 2010. Web. 23 Mar.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    98 N.J. Super. 235, 236 A.2d 630, N.J. Super. Lexis 389 (1967) Superior court of New Jersey, Law Division…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plainclothes Officer McFadden was patrolling downtown Cleveland to suppress purse swatches, shoplifting, and robbery of merchants plus shoppers when he observed John W. Terry and two cohorts case a corner store for a robbery. Officer McFadden became suspicious, went up to the three men and conducted a pat-down. When the officer pat-down the outside of Terry's coat, he felt something hard in Terry's outer pocket that felt like a gun. McFadden reached into that pocket only and confiscated an illegally possessed gun. Officer proceeded and arrested Terry.…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Terry V. Ohio Case Study

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In 1963, a Cleveland detective observed three gentlemen hanging out in front of a store and their behavior was somewhat suspicious. The detective suspected that the two gentlemen were planning to rob the store, so he decided to conduct a pat-down Terry and discovered a revolver in his coat. Subsequently, Terry was charged with carrying a concealed weapon and later found guilty. The petitioner claimed that "stop and frisk" constituted an unreasonable search and seizure. In 1968, the Supreme Court established the standard for allowing police officers to perform a stop and frisk of a suspect in Terry v. Ohio case. Furthermore, a stop and frisk is detaining a person by law enforcement officer for the purpose of an investigation, accompanied by…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Citations: United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549, 115 S. Ct. 1624, 131 L. Ed. 2d 626 (1995).…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Star Charters v. Figueroa, 192 Ill. 2d 47, 733 N.E.2d 1282, 2000 Ill. LEXIS 987, 248 Ill. Dec. 284 (2000)…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case 2: Doucette v. Jones - [2006] N.B.J. No. 225, [2006] A.N.-B. no 225, 2006 NBCA 38, 299 N.B.R. (2d) 288, 18 B.L.R. (4th) 185, 24 E.T.R. (3d) 167, 148 A.C.W.S. (3d) 640, 2006 CarswellNB…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Legal Brief

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Palmore v. Sidoti, 466 U.S. 429, 104 S. Ct. 1879, 80 L. Ed. 2d 421 (1984)…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Terry Stop Case Study

    • 2397 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Justice Harlan wholeheartedly agree with the Court 's ultimate holding in this case, He was constrained to fill in a few gaps, as he saw it because what was said by this Court has serve as initial guidelines for law enforcement authorities and courts throughout the land as this important new field of law develops. A police officer 's right to make an on-the-street "stop" and an accompanying "frisk" for weapons is, of course, bounded by the protections afforded by the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. The Court holds and he agrees, that, while the right does not depend upon possession by the officer of a valid warrant, nor upon the existence of probable cause, such activities must be reasonable under the circumstances as the officer credibly relates them in court. Since the question in this and most cases is whether evidence produced by a frisk is admissible, the problem is to determine what makes a frisk reasonable. Concealed weapons create an immediate and severe danger to the public, and though that danger might not warrant routine general weapons checks, it could well warrant action on less than a "probability." In the absence of state authority, policemen have no more right to "pat down" the outer clothing of passers-by, or of persons to whom they address casual questions, than does any other citizen. Consequently, the Ohio courts did not rest the constitutionality of this frisk upon any…

    • 2397 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law enforcement officers in the United States often perform “Terry stops”, as part of the work routinely associated with police patrol. In policing the term “Terry Stops” which refers to the “stop and frisk” practice, was coined in 1968, and derives from the Supreme Court case Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1(1968) . In that landmark case, it was ruled that the Fourth Amendment constitutional right, made applicable to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment, that prohibits “unreasonable searches and seizures” of individuals by American government agents, is not violated, when police officers detain, for a short period time an individual whom they reasonably believe to be committing, have committed or about to commit a criminal activity.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    CJ 101 4th Amendment

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages

    To understand the impact of Terry v. Ohio, I feel it is important to first review the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment was established so citizens would not have to suffer unreasonable search and seizures like they did under British Rule. The Amendment states the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    R v Byrnes (1995) 183 CLR 501; 81 A Crim R 138; 69 ALJR 710; 13 ACLC 1488; 17 ACSR 551…

    • 3164 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides for the protection of citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. Because of this, our legal system requires that a warrant be obtained prior to a search of people or their homes or property. Without this provision, citizens would be subject to invasions of privacy without probable cause. While the idea behind the protection from unreasonable searches and seizures was well-intentioned, in practice it did not immediately live up to its aims. “For more than 100 years after its ratification, the Fourth Amendment was of little value to criminal defendants because evidence seized by law enforcement in violation of the warrant or reasonableness requirements was still…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case Law Search

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The aftermath of the 9/11 in 2001, has left the United States of America in frenzy. It is this particular event that has been devastating to our nation and unforgettable. Furthermore, stressing the importance of the safety and health of the general public. September 11, has caused federal and state governments to merge public health and public safety into one. This merger brought about the significance of public health preparedness. In other words, this merger created ways in which we can protect the country against future terrorist attacks and the precautions that we must now take to ensure that our nation and its people are protected (Annas, 2012). The United States Supreme Court now upholds the merger. But where problems begin is in the area of routine strip searches of those who are arrested (even those who commit a minor crime such as, not wearing a seat belt) before being confined to either jail or prison. The U.S. Supreme court had to determine whether or not these routine strip searches were a violation of the Fourth Amendment. According to Walenta (2010), the Fourth Amendment states: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” (para 1, pg. 1). In other words, this prohibits those in positions of authority to conduct strip searches on individuals without probable cause. Hence, the term “unreasonable” searches. Public health as well as medical professionals and staff should be informed of how. This writer will further discuss the findings in Annas’s article in the New England Journal of Medicine titled “Strip Searches in the Supreme Court –Prisons and Public…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil Rights

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This case has a similar background to those of the assignment. The original action is based in 1962 in the city of Jackson, Mississippi. In that lawsuit, Clark v. Thompson, 206 F. Supp. 539 (SD Miss. 1962), the…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Civil Law V. Criminal Law

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Bibliography: Barry K. Brown v. Richard Kay. (n.d.). Retrieved March 3, 2012, from Find A Case: http://ks.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.20120209_0000131.sny.htm/qx…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays