Preview

50 Shades Of Gray Book Analysis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
156 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
50 Shades Of Gray Book Analysis
I believe that people should be able to choose what they read, and that other people shouldn’t hold that right from them. In the article we all read on Laurie Halse Anderson, she says that adults just have to suck it up sometimes. I support reasonable censorship, such as not letting little kids read things with graphic sexual content or strong language, but nothing really heavy for older kids, like not letting them read books with violence or with controversial topics in them. Books such as the Harry Potter series shouldn’t be banned just because they have magic and witchcraft in them, but books like 50 Shades of Gray should definitely be. I think it’s more reasonable for the readers to be told that certain books contain violence, sexual content,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Although I don’t agree with most forms of censorship, I feel as if it is important in certain situations. For instance, television must be censored because all age groups watch it, and it influences younger children’s behavior because they have seen it on television. Not to mention anyone at any time can watch TV. Whereas censoring books is completely different. The reader has the option to read the book, making the author not reliable. Not just any age group can pick up a book and begin to read the content. But a six-month-old baby can sit in front of a television and be influenced by the action of a criminal. Certain things influence certain age groups and I feel as if books shouldn’t be responsible. You have to actually read a book; you cannot just sit and watch the pages. I feel as if censorship should appeal to only things that require it, and in my opinion, books do not require censorship.…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s society the biggest reason for book banning is based on protecting moral values set in place in the home. Well meaning teacher, parents, and other would be censors worry that by exposing the nation’s youth to concepts such as sex, drugs, and alcohol they will start experimenting with these things. Ultimately they fear the breakdown of the moral values emphasized in the home. This is especially true for conservative Christians, in the past ten years books such as J.K. Rowling’s Harry Potter series and, Philip Pullman’s His Dark Materials have caused a great deal of controversy among conservative Christians. The idea of magic, alternate and parallel universes is not a popular one among Conservative Christians. But does this really warrant all out banning books such as these? Most would say no, the ideals of a certain group should not determine what the rest of the population reads.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For me personally, books should not be banned because it is basically censoring someone else's art. Writers or authors have the right to publish whatever they want. They are just books. People should not get all worked up over a piece of literature. Especially schools. Schools across the country in different time periods banned the novel for the reasons being that it is too vulgar, sexual, and violent for kids to read. (“Banned Book: The Catcher in the Rye”)…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe censorship is acceptable because it’s very much needed in today’s society. Not all movies or music are meant for a younger age group. There are specific genres and ratings for children because most adults believe they should be “shielded” from the topics discussed or depicted. The NC-17 rating is perfect for those people who enjoy seeing brains ripped out of a person’s head. Also censorship is acceptable because there is larger variety of movies for parents to see while their child watches a PG…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I think that they’re should be only certain banned books.”The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks...Considered to be pornigraphic…”This quote means that a parent decided that a book should be banned for nothing.What i mean is that he/she decided that because she thought it looked inappropriate that it should be banned. Also I Think that the government shouldn't get involved with this topic. What i mean is that they shouldn’t decide on what we read because it looks bad or graphic. For example The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks was banned for being pornigraphic.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Do Books Be Banned

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Not all books that are banned should be but there are some that I see good reasoning for why it has been banned. In my opinion the book I read shouldn’t be banned, but I do see why some readers feel that it should, in the book there is some violence that might be disturbing to a young reader. Also to some young readers they may find the book to be scary. Even with these other points I am still against banning this book and many other books. I encourage anyone who dislikes a book or finds it inappropriate to think about their decision before challenging or banning a…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    These books are: Harry Potter by J.K Rowling, Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck, Catcher in the Rye by J.D Salinger, The Giver by Lois Lowry, Killing Mr.Griffen by Lois Duncan, Bridge to Terabithia by Katherine Paterson, When Dad Killed Mom by Julius Lester, The Lovely Bones by Alice Sebold, The Joy of Gay Sex by Dr. Charles Silverstein, Goosebumps by R.L Stine. The books Harry Potter by J.K Rowling and Goosebumps by R.L Stine both are very graphic and descriptive in their writing and they both are absurd non-fiction that go against all religions. Killing Mr.Griffen by Lois Duncan, When Dad Killed Mom by Julius Lester, The Giver by Lois Lowry, Bridge to Terabithia by Katherine Paterson all talk about tragic death to innocent people. Of mice and men is a very unique book that has all the elements to get banned such as betrayal, abuse, killing, rape, mental illness. All these elements are really hardcore when put together and have put tears into people’s eyes (including mine), and people didn’t like that and decided to ban the…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Book Bannings

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Books all over America are in danger. Books, objects that allow imagination and the expansion of the mind and the world around one, are often times subject to criticism and even bannings when any one person does not like the content. Books bannings should not be done whatsoever, let alone become a semi-common practice. Of course, bannings only occur after careful consideration. Or do they? Censorship is a growing problem in America, as parents and other authority figures ban various types of books in their community when content is too “edgy” or “age inappropriate”, and these are often gone through without the book so much as being opened. However, in all reality, what might be “wrong” for one child may be just right for another. Are book…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the research I’ve done about the book being banned, my opinion still remains that it’s not right to keep it away from children. I think schools should be allowed to provide the book to students, but I don’t think they should make them read it. If the child wants to read the book and their parents approve, it should be allowed in school libraries. If the book is offencive to you, don’t read it. Just because you don’t like it doesn’t mean nobody should be able to enjoy…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that every person should have the option to read whatever they want. Many schools claim they ban books because they do not want students to act out or feel uncomfortable. Schools are afraid that their students are going to achieve the violent crimes that are mentioned in the books. In the article "Banned Books" the article states," The First Amendment of the Constitution guarantees our right to free speech...includes the right…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many of these classic stories have been banned because of sexual references, racial slurs, religious intolerance, or supposed witchcraft promotion. Although some may consider these books controversial or inappropriate, many English classes have required their students to read these books (About banned). It should be believed that even controversial books could ultimately boost, not deter, our educational wealth. Book banning should be opposed for three main reasons: education should be open to everyone, citizens should have access to the press, and, lastly, parents should monitor what their own children read and not what other children can obtain. For these reasons, I conclude that the government should play no role in what books any age group can obtain.…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Banning Books In Schools

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Throughout the years, books from classics to young adult novels have been banned.. Books are an essential part of education. They have always been there to teach children, but all over the country, books are being prohibited. Certain books are not only banned in schools but they are also banned in libraries, and bookstores, limiting public access to specific pieces of literature. These books are banned for because they include profanity, or sometimes having different opinions than the majority of the population. However, Books should not be banned in schools because banning certain books prevents freedom of speech, keeps readers away from reality, and limits learning tools.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Because there are so many reasons people challenge a book’s content, many more books are getting banned from schools. "Most frequently, books are challenged because they contain profanity or violence, sex or sex education, homosexuality, witchcraft and the occult, "secular humanism" or "new age" philosophies, portrayals of rebellious children, or "politically incorrect," racist or sexist language"(Mullaly). During this time in life, most of these topics are dealt with on a daily basis. Tons of people using drugs or trying to recover from drug use, different forms of sexuality and how the world can be both accepting and not accepting of it. People are around others with different beliefs, religious or otherwise, all the time. "But what's truly obscene is that I know a real girl in the real world who has gone through this. What's obscene is that so do you, even if you're not aware of the specifics. What's obscene is that you know kids who have gone through, and are going through, worse" (Crutcher). People see others facing difficult situations that are often similar to situations that happen in books, especially ones being banned. Sometimes a book is the most comforting thing to a person, if they find a book that perfectly represents the situation they are facing they can feel like they aren’t alone. Banning books doesn’t help a town as much as the…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He feels a deep sense of guilt and pain because of the condition of society…

    • 2652 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    They each have gone through different experiences and have formed to become the person they are different from any other person. Therefore, the only person who can decide what they want to read, or wat is against their own personal set of morals is themself. By banning books or censoring books, people can not choose for themselves, limiting their freedom given to them by the government. If a particular person does not approve of a topic, idea or theme in a novel, then they do not have to read it, but trying to have it banned is not allowing others to make that judgement for themselves (Harvey, Linda). Some may say that libraries or publishers are not trustworthy of protecting the youth of today from ideas that they see as “wrong’ or “immoral” (Manning, Erin). Should those readers not be allowed to decide for themselves what they believe is good or bad? For example, the way that today's teens have grown up is completely different than that of their parents or grandparents. These teens see the world differently, than the adults of the world. While it is important to learn from past mistakes, should the older members be allowed to continue to dictate what youth read and ultimately come to believe (Harvey, Linda)? A recent study has shown that adults are more likely to support censoring or banning books while most youth are against it (Rampell, Catherine). Neil Gaiman once said, “ Ideas- written ideas are special. They are the…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays