As the attorney for Joseph, the inmate in Louisiana, I’m writing to defend his 8th amendment rights. Joseph has committed murder, sentencing him to death. In his situation, he was attempting to kill himself but misfired murdering his roommate in the other room. This accident should not be punished by death as it wasn’t attempting. Joseph’s sad and unusual case mustn’t go to the worst stage of punishment and we plead for a life in prison instead of a lethal injection.…
This work POL 303 Week 2 Discussion Questions 1 4th Amendment comprises solution of the following task: "What rights are protected by the 4th Amendment? Provide three concrete examples. Why are unreasonable searches forbidden? What factors determine whether a search is reasonable or not? Explain in 200…
This article discusses the Eighth Amendment, which states that “excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.” According to the child rape statute in Louisiana, the death penalty or life imprisonment is being administered to convicted pedophiles, as such; research on mental abnormality, and Forensic Psychology to assess the punishment. The author of this article is Brian Sellers, BA, University of North Carolina, and works in the Department of Criminal Justice. As a knowledgeable individual of the law, he explored the pros and cons whether the death penalty is appropriate for pedophiles, hence the many studies being conducted to support his point. This article will highlight…
This case deals with the eighth amendment and shows, the freedom to “ Be able to be heard before physical punishment is given.” In the end of this case the supreme court took a vote on who went with the “ Wright ” side or the “ Ingraham “ side. Ingraham lost with the vote of 5-4. The court says that “ Public school student could be paddled without being heard.’ The court says they ruled this was because “ The eighth amendment doesn’t contain the word “Criminal” so the court should not impose that limitation.…
Explain the two-fold requirement discussed in Katz v. United States, for analyzing when a search occurs under the 4th Amendment.…
In the fourteenth amendment it states no person is allowed to be denied life, in that case, should we have the right to die? In 1983, the supreme court ruled in favor of Nancy Cruzan, in the case of Nancy vs. Missouri, by vote of the Supreme Court 5-4. Yes, the Supreme Court made the right decision. My reasonings are because Nancy Cruzan died by choice.Next, a few days before she died nineteen doctors actually tried to reinsert the tube. Lastly, Missouri life support were taking away her right to pursue happiness.…
The “Cruel and Unusual Punishment” Clause of the Eighth Amendment came from the English Bill of Rights that were adopted in 1689. This provision was written into the English Bill of Rights after Titus Otis, who lied causing many innocent people to be executed, was punished in a cruel and unusual way at the time. George Manson first used the cruel and unusual punishment clause in 1776 when he drafted the Declaration of Rights for the Commonwealth of Virginia. In 1791, the clause was added to the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution. People feared that if this clause was not added that Congress would abuse its power and use cruel and unusual punishments as a tool to oppress them.…
Karen L. Jerman had a mortgage with Countrywide Home Loans and was contacted by the law firm Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich LPA, on behalf of Country Wide, seeking a foreclosure on Jerman’s property.…
The Eighth Amendment: It prohibits excessive bail and cruel and unusual punishment. In the case of Atkins v. Virginia, the facts brought to the court was that the defendant, Daryl Atkins was tried for capital murder and sentenced to death for the shooting of a victim named Eric Nesbitt. Atkins had been smoking and drinking all day before he decided to walk to a convenient store and hold Nesbitt at gun point, upon Daryl’s dissatisfaction with the money he took, he kidnaped Nesbitt, taking him to an ATM to with drawl 200 dollars, along with a friend named William Jones, in Nesbitt’s car. When Daryl was satisfied with the money taken, he further continued his violence by driving Nesbitt to an isolated area, forcing him out of the vehicle, and then shot Nesbitt eight times killing him.…
In the constitution of the United States, the very documents that our nation is built upon, it is said that, “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. The Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1791, has three provisions” (Madison, 1778). Dzhokhar Tsarnaev would in turn later be sentenced to the death penalty for his crimes. However the questions still stand, is this the appropriate ruling? Or is capital punishment in violation of The Eighth Amendment? After all the killing and pain that he caused, the death penalty is nothing but the right punishment for a man so tarnished by evil. Tsarnaev does not stand alone in his crimes. Around the world and around our country people perform acts that should not be taken lightly, and should be punished heavily. Acts of terror, gruesome murders, rape, and a long list of other atrocious crimes should all be punishable by murder. While the system is not perfect, it is fixable and it is just. Justice is blind, but punishment…
Solitary confinement has been called into question as violating of the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution. The Eighth Amendment guarantee the protect from any cruel and unusual punishment. On Febuarary 24, 2012, a Russian immigrant named Viktor Bout challenged the use of solitary confinement during his time in Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC). Bout was convicted on 2 November 2011, for conspiracy of attempting to smuggle arms to the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) to kill U.S. citizens and delivery of anti-aircraft missiles. Once Bout was convicted he was held in solitary confinement for fourteen months. Judge Scheindlin (2012) ruled that,…
The 10th amendment was written as the last amendment on the original Bill of Rights. It was added to assure the delegates from different states that the Federal Government would not step outside the boundaries established in the Constitution. It also helps define the concept of federalism, the relationship between Federal and state governments. Having said that, it would seem obvious that the state should be allowed the power to prevent or accept the use of marijuana for medical reasons. Most would agree but it is possible that others have a different opinion on the subject.…
Martin Luther King Jr. once said “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” Imagine being put into a situation where someone is in complete and utter control of your future and the severity of it. Now pretend they also are going to make it as severe as possible either because you are from a poor family, you have different religious or political views, or someone bribed them to make it as harsh as possible for you. This obviously is not fair and would cause any rational person to rebel against the system put in place for them; that is exactly what the colonists did when King George III took away the colonists’ right to trial by jury. Colonists knew the importance of the 7th Amendment because it prevented judicial bias and allowed…
In this case, the felony-murder law is unconstitutional and Tisons cannot be executed because if they did not plan to or actually kill anyone, under the 8th Amendment, their punishment given is cruel and unusual. In Enmund v. Florida, Earl Enmund was given the death sentence for being an accessory to two murders. He later appealed and the Supreme Court ruled it was unlawful and his death sentence was vacated. The defendant’s punishment must be proportionate to the crimes they have committed and those not actually performing the murders should not be given the death sentence. We want consistency in the Supreme Court and giving the death penalty for Ricky and Raymond Tison should be uplifted because it would just not be a reasonable punishment. The 14th Amendment states, “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws”. In the Enmund case, Earl Enmund was not given the death sentence because he did not commit any murder. It is only fair, under these circumstances, that the Tison brothers shouldn’t be given the death sentence either because they did not commit any murders. Our defendants were accessories to the murders, they aided and embedded their father and his friend, they were involved in armed robbery, kidnapping, and car theft but due to the fact that there is no evidence that the defendants intended to, attempted to, or in fact kill anyone, they do not deserve the death penalty under these conditions. We want to honor the 8th and 14th Amendment and keep uniformity in this country and that is why these two men should not receive the death sentence. There is no question these two brothers should be punished and that is why a life sentence without possibility of parole is a more…
One of the most highly debated amendments of the United States Constitution is the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment has been disputed for hundreds of years on exactly of its exact true meaning. The United States Constitution wrote the Second Amendment as “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."…