Political
Government support for national carriers (Johnson, Gerry. 2011, pg51)
Security Controls (Johnson, Gerry. 2011, pg51)
Investment support
Restrictions on migration (Johnson, Gerry. 2011, pg51)
Deregulations (try to cut down airfare prices)
Economic
National growth rates (Johnson, Gerry. 2011, pg51)
Fuel prices (Johnson, Gerry. 2011, pg51)
High costs associated with the Full Service Carrier business model
Liberalization …show more content…
of markets
Increasing world trade and investment
Social
Rise in travel by elderly
Student international study exchanges
Changing life styles
Increase in the number of educated people
Globalization
Technological
Fuel-efficient engines and airframes
Security check technologies
Teleconferencing for business
Consolidation
Alternative fuels
Environmental
Air pollution controls
Noise pollution controls
Energy consumption controls
Land for growing airports
Legal
Employee work hours
Restrictions on mergers
Preferential airport rights for some carriers
Porter’s five forces analysis for pre 9/11
Threat of Entry
High regulations
Capital intensive
Requires high level of experience and knowledge
It has a high barrier entry
Monopoly in some cities’ airports
The Threat of Substitutes
Busses, ships, rail industry
In Europe, Russia rail is the preferred transportation mode
In US rail and road are the mode of transportation for goods
Prices are regularly low comparing to airfares in Europe for within Europe and Russia
Ships are being used for transportation of goods in bulk to continents
But for individual transportation for long distances mostly airlines are preferred.
The Power of Buyers
Almost 50% increase within a decade, due to increase in the number of retirees. Also rise in the world GDP.
Increasing number of airline companies gives more choice to select from to the buyers.
Customer loyalty highly depended on airfares. Price sensitive.
So bargaining power of the buyer is high.
Technological innovations give advantages to business travelers (skype, conference calls…etc)
The Power of Suppliers
Pilot’s unions, “there is no good alternative to a well-trained pilot in the cockpit”.
The supply is mainly being done by Boeing and Airbus, Aramco, Gazprom
All of the suppliers have high power.
(Fuel, maintenance, labor).
Competitive Rivalry
Low margin cost (1-2% net profit)
Increase in the number of airlines
High costs
High exit barrier
As per the case study “analysts were predicting that the US airline industry world lose some $.5bn because of the slowing economy combined with a large decline in business travel.” So the decrease and losses were already happening, due to technological, mismanagement and economic reasons. 9/11 may have given good reasons for mistakes.
2. Analyze the attractiveness post 9/11.
The decrease hit the bottom with the terrorist attacks. People preferred other ways to travel.
PESTEL Analysis of the Airline Industry Post 9/11
Political
Government support for national carriers (bailout money $4bn)
Tax break for the next five years (national carriers)
Security Controls increased (3 hours early check in)
Restrictions on migration (Johnson, Gerry. 2011, pg51)
Economic
Lay offs
Cost increase due to security increase
Supplier’s suppliers were affected
Probable increase in the demand for metal detectors and security items
Increase in the insurance …show more content…
cost
Increase in the airfare but after 2007 airlines are raising against each other, prices are going down
Social
Fear against flights
No trust to security
Choice towards road, rail, or teleconferencing. Technological
Need for advanced security check, secure stronger technologies including navigational equipment.
Teleconferencing for business
Environmental
Air pollution controls
Noise pollution controls
Energy consumption controls
Land for growing airports
Legal
Stronger rules over employees
Tighter regulations
Increase in the consumer rights and protection*
3.
How might airlines better plan for disruptive events such as 9/11?
They could have done scenario planning and train the employees according to the worst case scenario.
Shell was the only company during the crisis which survived because they had the scenario before and when they started to feel the crisis they reacted before it reached at the door. Airline industry can do the same thing, and train their employees.
Government can do trainings at the school or public places for worst case scenarios.
Airplane suppliers can produce safer doors for the cockpit. And security companies should not just hire normal people they should have people from the army or police departments at the airports who are well trained. References
Johnson, Gerry. Exploring Strategy. 9th edition. Pearson Education Limited, England.(2011). Pg 51
Porter, Michael E. ‘The Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy’. Harvard Business Review. January 2008. Pg. 78-93
Ward, Rodney. September 11 and the Restructuring of the Airline Industry. 2002. Source: http://dollarsandsense.org/archives/2002/0502ward.html. Accessed on [October 5,
2013]
*Wensveen, John, Ph.D. THE AIRLINE INDUSTRY: Trends, Challenges, Strategies. Dean, School of Aviation Dowling College, New York, USA http://sydney.edu.au/business/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/67789/johnw-presentation.pdf. Accessed on [October 5, 2013]