Preview

A Brief Look At Czar Nicholas II

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1975 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Brief Look At Czar Nicholas II
Czar Nicholas II was the last of the Romanov dynasty and the last czar to ever rule over the country of Russia. He was trained to be an army man, but was forced to take on the role of being the czar when his father died. Since he was never taught by his father on how to rule a country properly, he was easily persuaded by people such as Rasputin to do what others thought was best for Russia. Czar Nicholas II disliked being the czar at times, but his wife, Alexandra, and five children, Olga, Tatiana, Maria, Anastasia, and Alexei, always brought a smile to his face. Sadly, all good things must come to an end. In 1917, Czar Nicholas II’s entire family, pets, and some servants were executed by the Bolsheviks- a group of people that were against …show more content…
At the palace, Nicholas and his first cousin, the future King George V of Britain became lifelong friends, regardless of how Nicholas’s father, Alexander III and Queen Victoria, George’s mother, disliked each other. They both had similar appearances and personalities and dislike William, the future German Kaiser. He spent most of boyhood in Gatchina, Russia where he received a strict upbringing since his mother, the Czarina, taught Nicholas to model himself on Peter the Great, a past czar of Russia. Nicholas became a czarevitch (crown prince) early in his life when his older brother died (Rice 271). Nicholas grew up in the isolation of his family, and had a lack of friends outside of European royalty that deprived him of the benefit of understanding the way his future subjects lived (“Nicholas”). Because of that he never gained a sense of confidence and self reliance. Also, he was the best educated European Monarch of his time, but he was taught nothing to fit him for the tasks of a sovereign. He was purposefully cut off from liberal thoughts and ideas by his parents, and instead he received a soldier’s preparation. Nicholas achieved the rank of Colonel in the Life Guards and loved the …show more content…
He tried to conceal his exhaustion and physical pain from others. The assassination of Archduke Francis Ferdinand at Sarajevo in 1914 made Nicholas to diplomatic efforts aimed at averting war. Unfortunately, Russia went to war in 1914 to defend the Serbs when Austria declared war on Serbia. But, when war broke out it enhanced Nicholas’s popularity even though Nicholas ignored the Duma and discouraged the effects of patriotic volunteers. He also bowed to his wife’s advice in relieving the tremendously popular Grand Duke Nicholas as commander in chief of the armed forces and assuming direction of the army himself. Nicholas went into the lines to lead his armies but the problems increased and many soldiers deserted. Nicholas’s departure for the front meant that his wife had to rule Russia and Rasputin appointing new members to the cabinet and clergy. Those soldiers were instrumental in the February Revolution in 1917 which ended the Romanov Dynasty. On March 8th, 1917 riots broke out throughout Russia, and seven days later Nicholas abdicated the throne in favor of his brother Michael, who declined the crown. The royal family was imprisoned and then transported Yekaterinburg in Ural Mountains. It looked as if anti-revolutionary White Russian forces might arrive to rescue the royal family, the Bolsheviks killed the royal family in the cellar of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    War broke out in 1914, with Tsar Nicholas becoming commander-in-chief in 1915, meaning he was away from Petrograd. Not only was this poorly thought out by Nicholas because it gave the people an opportunity to plot against him, but as he was away he left Tsarina (also a German princess), Alexandra, in charge during his absence. Due to the war being against Germany, this made the Russian people nervous and skeptical towards the extreme power she had over them during such a crucial time. Not only were they disgruntled by this, but also Alexandra’s close friendship to Rasputin, a Serbian peasant. This particularly angered the aristocracy and middle classes as they believed they were being led by someone of lower demeanor than that of themselves. This weakened support for the autocratic rule and lost the Tsar many of his supporters, which put him in a vulnerable position in the case of revolutionary upturn. This also could have inspired the peasantry to discover greater aspirations and encourage their belief that they could have greater status which in turn could trigger new revolutionary ideas amongst the lower classes. This demonstrates a link between Nicholas being away in order to commandeer army movement for the war, however it is arguable that it was a lack of authority and respect for the Tsarist regime that caused the change of opinions towards the Tsar amongst all classes, lessening his support and leaving him far more vulnerable in the case of a revolution.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Czar Nicholas was famous for his autocratic ideas, meaning that he theoretically had total power. His autocratic belief led to an ineffective rule. Nicholas II was the leader of the Russian Empire; however, he was not prepared for the tremendous obligations of administration. The Britannica article, “Nicholas II” claims, “Neither by upbringing nor by temperament was Nicholas fitted for the complex tasks that awaited him as autocratic ruler of a vast empire.” This suggests that Czar Nicholas’s rule was doomed from the start of his czarship. Nicholas’s inexperience explained his ineffectiveness as a ruler. In addition, Czar Nicholas’s absolutist beliefs blinded him from change. Nicholas II’s belief that he had absolute power and stubbornness clouded his view of change. According to Encyclopedia.com’s “Nicholas II,” “[Nicholas] was too stubborn and very slow to recognize the need for change. Nicholas found it…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Candice Ivan IV, Tsar of Russia is better known as Ivan the terrible. In the following paragraphs I will depict major events in his life and the role he played in Russia. I will also exhibit the many positive things that he did. As well as the negative things that he did to Russian society during his reign of thirty-seven years. I will debate the fact that Ivan IV was nick named Ivan the terrible.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II was the head of the Romanov family who had ruled Russia for five generations from 1613 to 1762. When Nicholas had inherited the throne he married Alexandra Fyodorovna of Hesse, who was from Germany. They had five children together, but their popularity was starting to fall by 1914. When there was the outbreak of the war, the Russian people criticised Alexandra’s German heritage and Nicholas’s failure to treat Russia’s social, political and economic problems caused further discontent among the Russian people.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In July 1918, the royal Romanov line was suddenly and brutally ended by the Bolsheviks. The Romanov family had ruled the Russian Empire for over three centuries. The Romanovs reign was one of strict tyranny. Tsar Nicholas II of Russia made one big step toward a more equal Russia by freeing the serfs but because the serfs owned no land they had little to no money still. After WWI when nicholas led Russia to a crushing defeat there was lots of unrest throughout Russia. I think that the main reason the Tsar was forced to abdicate the throne and then was slaughtered is that he made a more equal Russia but in doing so he made the serfs more impoverished than ever, that he had led Russia into multiple wars that had ended badly and that the technology…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II’s lack of military experience and inability to rule the throne all together, additionally contributed to the devastating outcome of WW1 on Russia. “A quick intelligence, a cultivated mind, method and industry in his work, an extraordinary charm that attracted all who came near him- the Emperor Nicholas had not inherited his father’s commanding personality nor the strong character and prompt decision which are so essential to an autocratic ruler...” stated Sir G. Buchanan, British ambassador to Russia in 1910, emphasizes how the urban lower classes were not the only ones unsatisfied with the Tsar Nicholas…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Summary: Romanov Dynasty

    • 4116 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Nicholas II, the last tsar of Russia, had neither the qualities nor the desire to rule imperial Russia. Born in Tsarskoye Selo in 1868, Nicholas was the eldest son of Alexander III, the fearsome tsar who had reimposed autocracy and oppression on the Russian empire after the murder of Alexander II. Those who met the young tsarevich, described him as pleasant and likeable, but otherwise unremarkable – hardly the traits of a man ordained by God to rule Russia. Nicholas famously expressed reluctance about taking the throne, declaring that he “never wanted to rule”. But tradition…

    • 4116 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II was a very poor leader for the people of Russia, he lacked leadership skills. His poor leadership qualities lead too many problems within Russia that were not dealt with efficiently. For example he did not trust the Duma, in 1906 the first Duma was introduced; after 72 days Nicholas dissolved the Duma as he did not believe in their policies and he did not trust them. This angered many people, Nicholas was not giving anyone a chance to speak and help him to change Russia.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the book the ”The Family Romanov” there were many tragedies. In 1894 Russia’s last tsar, Nicholas II, inherited the throne when he was unprepared to do so. Another tragedy was that Nicholas’s only son was a hemophiliac. At the end of the book Nicholas, his wife, and his five children died. Karl Marx once said, “History repeats itself, first as a tragedy, second as farce.”…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. Nicholas II Nicholas II was the last Czar of Russia from 1894 until 1917 when he was forced to abdicate. He was the leader of Russia during a turbulent time when the Russian society was ready for the changes he was not willing to make. Nicholas II would lead Russia into War World I as the commander of the Russian army despite his qualifications to do so. He wouldn’t back down from war and let his country slide into worsening circumstances which would eventually lead to his abdication and the revolutionary takeover of Russia.…

    • 1993 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Undeniably, Nicholas II had an enormous role in bringing about the downfall of the Romanov Dynasty in March 1917. Whilst many historians argue the fall of the Tsarist regime to be the direct response and product of World War I, it is quite evident that it was Nicholas’ inefficient and fatal autocratic ruling which led to the March Revolution of 1917. The effects of Russia’s involvement in numerous wars only heightened and highlighted Nicholas’ unsuitability for the role of Tsar, and his absolute and stubborn belief in autocracy. Had Nicholas’ various choices throughout his reign differed, the Romanov Dynasty could in fact, have existed…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The losses over the course of the war were staggering, making it very unpopular throughout Russia, all while oppression and corruption persisted throughout the government. With shortages of food and water along with mass rioting in 1917, soldiers abandoned its government to side with the citizens demanding change inside the government. The Duma commanded that the Czar resign and Nicholas II relinquished his power. Nicholas II were shortly thereafter exiled and later executed, ending the Russian…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He worried that what he had worked so hard to accomplish would be destroyed by his son who had no lessons in how to rule a country. Nicholas II, as a child, was sheltered from his parents; and the Russian people’s point of views, or beliefs, and he developed an outlook toward his future with “honor, service and tradition” (Atchison). Nicholas enjoyed the military field and had an “excellent education and was perhaps the best educated European monarch of his time.” Nicholas II wanted to please…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexei, who puzzled the people - they didn’t know about his condition - and was seen as spoiled and unloveable by politicians, was reasonably killed. He followed his father’s way of life, one that the people of Russia greatly disliked. It also made sense that Alexandra, the tsarina, was killed, as the people mistrusted her and Rasputin. Wherever Alexandra went, Rasputin went too. On the other hand, Nicholas’s brother, Grand Duke Michael, was asked to take the throne. (He later on refused) Eventually though, as history tells, most of the Romanov family was led to their deaths. OTMA, on the other hand, were possibly murdered due to the fact that their parentage led people to believe the children would turn out like Nicholas II and Alexandra. Nicholas was actually an uneducated man. “He had few intellectual pretensions” and instead preferred to leave the politics and papers to others. His parents did not bother educating him well either; Nicholas was tutored by average and undesirable people. The upbringing of the tsar helped Nicholas rule the way he did, and look at other people the way he did. The tsar was not very smart, so he sent away all ministers that he thought were more intelligent than him due to superiority belief. The people might have thought that OTMA and Alexei would turn out the same way - as Alexei showed he…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Last of the Romanovs

    • 3074 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The fall of the Romanov Empire changed the face of Russia forever. The royal family, led by Nicholas II, we're imprisoned and eventually assassinated by the Bolsheviks, a political party founded by Vladimir Lenin and Alexander Bogdanov whose main focus was to eliminate the monarchy and employ their own form of democracy. Tsar Nicholas II, his wife, Alexandra, and their only son, Alexei, heir apparent to the throne, were all integral figures in this historical evolution of Russia and its people.…

    • 3074 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays