A Brief Summary Of Navy Seal

Mark Walberg’s character and the other men are Navy Seals were tapped with a mission to kill a high powered Taliban leader. During their mission, they were stumbled upon by goat herders in the mountains. Unable to make communication with base, they must decide the fate of these men. They find themselves at odds with each other as what to do and consequences of their actions they are considering. Once the ill-fated decision is made to let them go, they move to higher ground and continue to try to reach base to arrange their extraction from their compromised mission.
If subjectivism was the base of their moral reasoning, I believe Mark Walberg’s character would have killed the goat herders. The subjective view is that anything is moral as long as you feel that it is a moral thing to do. A Navy Seal is trained for the hard missions that most are not able to complete. They are trained to get in and get out and to do whatever is necessary to complete that mission. This includes taking lives to
This belief is based on what the culture dictates to be moral reasoning. The culture of the military, when at war, is to defeat the enemy and to come home alive. Therefore, I believe that Mark Walberg’s character would have killed the goat herders under this moral reasoning as well. Since one culture is unable to judge another culture for what they find to be morally acceptable, then they would not be judged by anyone if they decided to kill them. After finding the satellite phone on the goat herders, there was no mistaking that the Taliban would find out that they were there. This not only compromises their mission of defeating the enemy, but also puts all their lives at risk if contact could not be made for extraction. Moreover, if looked at from the culture of Afghanistan, the area that they were in, killing a person for having a different agenda is acceptable. Under either culture’s moral reasoning, killing them would be