Length of stay was not the only process that was made more effective with the implementation of the PSH model at UC Irvine Health. Another aspect that was positively affected by the PSH model was turnover time of a procedure. According to UC Irvine Health ninety two percent of procedures start at 7:30 in the morning. With the implementation of the PSH model the turnover time averaged about 29 minutes. This was a 31 percent improvement from before the PSH model was implemented. For those worried about the performance of a surgeon because the turnover time improved, it went unaffected. According to UC Irvine Health, the 166 cases researched that all 166 cases had 100.00 performance rates. Because the performance of the surgeons was so high in less amount of time, this lowered the readmission rate for the same health issue. UC Irvine found that the readmission rate for hip arthroplasties is zero percent. The national average for readmission for a knee arthroplasty is between 2.5 percent and 4.3 percent compared to UC Irvine Health readmission rate which is 1.1 percent…
The facts of the case stated that on August 2, 2009, Riley, who belonged to the one of the gangs of San Diego, California, and others shot at a rival gang member while driving past them. The shooters got into Riley’s car and drove away. Then, twenty days later on August 22, 2009, the police pulled Riley over driving a different car because of his expired license registration tags. They found that his driver’s license had been suspended. Police searched his car before impounding it. During the search, the police located two guns in the car and then arrested Riley for possession of said guns. Riley had his cell phone in his pocket at…
4)The case we read in class that I enjoyed the most was State of Connecticut v. Cardwell. I primarily liked it because it best exemplifies the difference and complexity regarding the sale of goods and the helps reflect the distinction between a “shipment” and “destination” contracts. I disagree with the trial courts judgment that Cardwell sold tickets within Connecticut and thereby violated Connecticut statute. However, I agree with the judgment of the court after the appeal. The transfer of goods occurred in Massachuestes, therefore the sale of the tickets, as defined by the code, occurred in Massachusts.…
Chimel v California (1969) was a landmark case that involved Officers armed with only an arrest warrant, enter Ted Chimel’s home and arrest him for burglary. The Officers decided to search his entire house in search of the stolen coins from the burglarized coin shop. They justified their search maintaining that it was to uncover evidence but that it was incident to arrest. Chimel was convicted and his appeal reached the U.S. Supreme Court; where they overturned the ruling stating that “the search of Chimel’s residence, although incident to arrest, became invalid when it went beyond the person arrested and the area subject to that person’s “immediate control” (Schmalleger, 2014). This case gave officers the authority to conduct a protective…
a member of a different gang driving by. They used Riley's car to get away and then left the car somewheres else. On August 22, 2009 they pulled Riley over while he was driving another car on an expired license registration tag. After Riley was stopped for this violation the officer seized and searched his phone without a warrant, he was arrested on weapon charges. The Riley v. California case was argued April 29, 2014 and decided on June 25, 2014.The main issue in this case was how the police officer searched his phone without a warrant then arrested him and if this action violated the fourth amendment. The fourth amendment clearly states that “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures…”.…
I believe Stogner v. California (2003) favors the offender’s rights because the offender escaped justice due to passage of time. In some cases, I believe passage of time could be acceptable, but in cases of serious personal and psychological injury, I do not believe passage of time should be such a factor.…
|Duty-based Ethics |Regardless of consequences, |Deontology, pluralism, |C |It is my duty to follow through…
Informed consent is the process in which a client voluntarily agree to a proposed treatment option. This is imperative because the client should always be aware of and understand the proposed treatment options. The advantages and disadvantages are made aware to the client as well as specific risks and alternatives. Informed consent derived from battery, which is when the touching of another person is unauthorized and both parties don’t agree on it. I believe that every person should have the right to determine what is to be done with their body and treatment that is offered to individuals. Not having informed consent violates a client’s personal rights and is dangerous for the client and the professional. A client also have the right to informed refusal which is when a client refuses to participate in all of or part of certain treatment plans. The professional should always explain the consequences of not completing said treatment plan so the client is fully aware of what the repercussions are. Clients have the right to refuse treatment and do so for many of reasons. Some refuse services because of fear, inconvenience, denial, or they simply can’t afford it. Both of informed consent and refusal are totally up to the client’s discretion and are able to make the decisions they want based on how they feel.…
individuals in high management and all those working in the organization. All individuals have their own interpretation of what the rules are and the ethical climate of the organization. This is further explained by the Stages of Moral Development as described in Chapter 2 of the text. For example, an individual in the obedience and punishment orientation will perceive things differently than an individual in the social contract stage. If a person in the lowest stage feels that there is no risk of being caught, the individual will be more likely to engage in unethical behavior, if it benefits them, as evidenced by Lionel Waters of Wesson. Depending on the level of authority the individual has in the organization, the effects of their influence can be great or small. Mr. Waters is in higher management and his personal impact is great because it affects other people. Valerie faced this major dilemma because of her personal belief, but also because of his level in management. She was not sure if there were others in management that knew what was going on.…
If Carolina decides to support the director’s belief ”do bad to do good”, the Kant principle would not apply. In the other hand applying the equity principle of distributive justice for the community would force them to start reporting their information correctly. Caroline was always known and chosen because of her reputation that she is been building all these time, by violating the code of conduct, it would affect her directly as well. These ethical problems exist at the organizational level.…
This paper renders a point of view on the ethical dilemma presented in the case study of the Disappearing Degree from the ethical stand point of view the writer. This paper also weighs in on the philosophical viewpoints of Hobbes, Hume’s and Kent’s theories that are consistent with their views on ethics and human nature.…
Alex’s decision can change the whole situation and affects strongly to all of the stakeholders especially CMI’s employees and local people. In a deontological approach, Alex must follow the rightness and fairness to make the best ethical decision (Brooks, 174). It means that Alex and CMI Company need to follow the government’s rule that they have to stop all the transactions with the unsavory organizations even though the whole company would be in risk of being killed or economic damages. This Deontological theory brings the conflict between law and morality while only one can be followed (Brooks, 145). Government’s law is what people have to follow but they cannot ignore the facts and consequences. The consequentialist context, however, considers an act is ethical if “its favorable consequences outweigh its negative consequences” (Brooks, 173). In this case, Alex should put safety and lives of employees on top. It means, CMI Company should continue to pay for the unsavory organizations while hiding those payments from the government. The consequence of this decision is safety for every one and the business can run normally. The other consequence could be CMI’s employees would lose their jobs and CMI’s CEO might be arrested as supporting for terrorist criminal. But because the benefit is over the negative consequence so it is considered…
Deontological ethics has as its basic thrust, the concept of a duty to do what is right. For one’s actions to be in accordance with DE, those actions must be realized out of a “notion of right (that) is not derived from a prior notion of good”, as explained by Illies (Illies, 2011, p. 107). A person should choose to perform an act solely because it is the right thing to do, irrespective of the act’s outcome or the consequences thereof.…
This essay will attempt to determine at which point deceit, larceny, and breaking a promise will be considered morally wrong according to three moral philosophies, with Kantian Deontology providing the clearest answer. The two other philosophies chosen are Utilitarianism and Virtue ethics. To begin with, Kantian Deontology will discuss the nature of ones duty towards always telling the truth as well as how a promise is considered 'good' in accord with duty will be discussed, followed by a disassembly of the grey area between wrong and right that Utilitarianism can bring up when looking into difficult situations. Finally ending with how components of Virtue ethics can effect…
Virtue theory, utilitarianism, and deontological ethics are three of the different approaches to ethics. This paper will go over the similarities and differences between virtue theory, utilitarianism, and the deontological principles. It will also include information of the variations in how each concept details ethics, morality, and will also discuss a personal experience to describe the correlation between virtue, values, and moral perceptions as they relate to one of the three theories.…