A Comparison Of Discipline Models
EDU-450 Classroom Management
A Comparison of Discipline Models
A Comparison of Discipline Models In comparing Wong’s theory and Kagan, Kyle, and Scott’s theory, they both give pupils the independence to do what they think is appropriate for them, and the educators and parents incorporate them in making the rules. The Win-Win approach fixes the situation by allowing the students to choose a better approach to the issue. Morrish’s Real- Discipline approach believes that students do not know how to behave properly and responsible when they begin school. This theory believes that students only learn self-discipline through experience. This theory requires assistance in the required behavior.
Wong’s …show more content…
I agree with it because it is a great idea to give students independence in making choices in the way they are disciplined for breaking the rules. Students need to know that they have a say in how they will be disciplined for their actions. This will give the students a sense of how you must follow the rules or be reprimanded for them.
Morrish’s Theory: I believe in Morrish’s behavior theory because the student is given a chance to correct their misbehavior. This theory allows the students to see that they have a chance to correct their behavior before disciplinary action is taken. This gives the students a sense of responsibility to choose to do the right thing.
Kagan, Kyle, and Scott’s Theory:
I agree with Kagan, Kyle, and Scott’s theory in the aspect that it is beneficial for teachers to develop ways that will disengage disruptive behavior in the classroom. Teachers must be able to distinguish which behaviors the students are engaged in and be able to appropriately correct the situation because the student’s behavior will escalate if not handled …show more content…
> This theory gives the students a since of importance in helping solving discipline issues.
> The teacher may have trouble anticipating the individual students’ needs and behaviors.
>The teacher may fall short of recognizing the student’s potential growth.
Morrish’s Real- Discipline Theory:
Teach students how to behave properly and insist they comply with directions. (Charles 2008).
>This theory gives courage for student to persevere as well as work through tasks which are not particularly pleasing (Charles, 2008).
> This theory makes the students alert of their surroundings and what is happening.
>Morrish’s overemphasis’ the disciplinary power of the teacher.
>Morrish’s theory places assumptions that low self-esteem students are subject to getting in trouble in school.
> Places assumption that teachers who spend time to motivate students are wasting time.
>This theory teaches students how to behave in the correct manner.
> This theory teaches students to be courtesy and considerate of others.
> The students will learn to follow a set of rules and limitations before being disciplined.
> Personal discipline is the focus of this
A Comparison of Discipline Models
A Comparison of Discipline Models In comparing Wong’s theory and Kagan, Kyle, and Scott’s theory, they both give pupils the independence to do what they think is appropriate for them, and the educators and parents incorporate them in making the rules. The Win-Win approach fixes the situation by allowing the students to choose a better approach to the issue. Morrish’s Real- Discipline approach believes that students do not know how to behave properly and responsible when they begin school. This theory believes that students only learn self-discipline through experience. This theory requires assistance in the required behavior.
Wong’s …show more content…
I agree with it because it is a great idea to give students independence in making choices in the way they are disciplined for breaking the rules. Students need to know that they have a say in how they will be disciplined for their actions. This will give the students a sense of how you must follow the rules or be reprimanded for them.
Morrish’s Theory: I believe in Morrish’s behavior theory because the student is given a chance to correct their misbehavior. This theory allows the students to see that they have a chance to correct their behavior before disciplinary action is taken. This gives the students a sense of responsibility to choose to do the right thing.
Kagan, Kyle, and Scott’s Theory:
I agree with Kagan, Kyle, and Scott’s theory in the aspect that it is beneficial for teachers to develop ways that will disengage disruptive behavior in the classroom. Teachers must be able to distinguish which behaviors the students are engaged in and be able to appropriately correct the situation because the student’s behavior will escalate if not handled …show more content…
> This theory gives the students a since of importance in helping solving discipline issues.
> The teacher may have trouble anticipating the individual students’ needs and behaviors.
>The teacher may fall short of recognizing the student’s potential growth.
Morrish’s Real- Discipline Theory:
Teach students how to behave properly and insist they comply with directions. (Charles 2008).
>This theory gives courage for student to persevere as well as work through tasks which are not particularly pleasing (Charles, 2008).
> This theory makes the students alert of their surroundings and what is happening.
>Morrish’s overemphasis’ the disciplinary power of the teacher.
>Morrish’s theory places assumptions that low self-esteem students are subject to getting in trouble in school.
> Places assumption that teachers who spend time to motivate students are wasting time.
>This theory teaches students how to behave in the correct manner.
> This theory teaches students to be courtesy and considerate of others.
> The students will learn to follow a set of rules and limitations before being disciplined.
> Personal discipline is the focus of this