Preview

A Comparison Of The Han And Yuan Dynasties

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
395 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Comparison Of The Han And Yuan Dynasties
Throughout ancient China, there were many dynasties that were set up. After one would collapse another one would soon arise and take its place. Because of this there were many different beliefs and government ideas on how China should be run. Some of the dynasties used each other’s ideas, but made them better so they succeeded this time. The two dynasties we will be looking at are the Han and Yuan dynasties. During the Han and Yuan dynasties, religious played a major part in their culture, government, and politics. Religion played a big role in the Han and Yuan Dynasty but they’re were some differences and similarities with that. In the Han Dynasty Confucian principles were the basis for Chinese government. When children were being taught

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both Han China and Imperial Rome used a centralized government with roads to help them rule their large empire, yet Han China had Confucianism to legitimize their rule while Roman emperors were dependent on the support of a large military force for legitimacy from 204 B.C.E to 476 C.E.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    China Dbq Analysis

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Between 100 CE to 600 CE China went between political unification as well as period fragmentation. China also experienced the effect that the rise and fall of confusion ideals and new emerging religions had on their culture. However, Confucianism was always an influence on china both culturally and politically.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In late B.C.E and early C.E many empires rose and thrived. While these empires all desired to conquer and become the strongest, they had other things in common. In Han China, a long lasting empire from 206 B.C.E to 220 C.E, the leadership was similar to the leadership of Imperial Rome, an empire from 31 B.C.E to 476 C.E. Both empires were lead by an emperor, who was the sole lawmaker for the empire, the over thrower of the previous leader and impact on many other aspects of the region. However, these two empires differed in their religious ways. In the Roman Empire, the government had a state sponsored religion and emperors participated in the organization of it. Contrary to Imperial Rome, Han China’s emperors were much less concerned with religion; instead they followed the Confucian ideology in their government. These two…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperial Rome’s political method is centered around polytheism. Han China’s political method is centered around Confucianism during the beginning of the dynasty, and then around Daoism after political changes were made. . Confucianism is defined as more of a philosophy than a religion. Confucius taught philosophical and ethical ideas, that shaped the traditional Chinese culture. Han China, after change in authority, transformed from Confucianism to Daoism. Imperial Rome was centered around polytheism, the worship of many Gods. It is very different than Daoism. Daoism is based upon philosophy and nature, but polytheism is based upon gods. Han China and Imperial Rome express different political methods of control through religion. Imperial Rome and Han China had different ways in which their leaders were chosen. In Han China, rule was gained through ancestors into a centralized bureaucratic authority. In Imperial Rome authority began through certain elements of democracy, not through ancestral…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Comparative Rome and Han

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Despite the similarities, they also had many differences in religion. Rome was mainly polytheistic, and strongly believed in and worshipped many gods. In Chinese religions such as Confucianism, there wasn’t much focus on gods but ancestor worship was very important. Another difference was religious tolerance. When Christianity was introduced to Rome, the Romans hated and persecuted the Christians. In China, Buddhism was introduced through the Silk Road. There was a bit discontent from the government and Confucianists but unlike the Christianity, it quickly became popular. Another difference was the effect of religion. In Rome, the emperor Constantine issued the Edict of Milan and granted tolerance toward Christians. It was finally accepted, but it was a factor to its downfall. In China, Confucianism, Taoism, and Buddhism made it prosper and all three became important parts of…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    - The Greeks and the Romans had a very different religious system compared to Han China that had more of a national philosophy then a religion.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    From 206 B.C.E. - 220 C.E., the Han dynasty, in China, accumulated many political control methods, as did Imperial Rome reigning from 31 B.C.E. – 476 C.E. However, there were more differences than similarities between the two empires/dynasties. Two main differences were China and Rome’s territorial expansion and their political philosophies (mandate of heaven and monarchy). A similarity between these two empires would be their centralized government adopting bureaucracy.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author’s thesis in this section is that despite having the factors to help them succeed, the Ming Empire did not want global dominance. The author included this empire to show that although this empire had many helpful characteristics, it did not reach world domination.…

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Although China has many dynasties, the Han and Ming dynasty were similar in some ways when founded. The Han dynasty followed confucianism. Their leader was a peasant, but then became emperor. The government leaders were fair, honest and kind. This made the dynasty a much better place.…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two of the great civilizations, Han China (206 BCE - 220 CE) and Mauryan/Gupta India (315 BCE - 550 CE) were the economic giants of their time. The economic production of both dynasties originally began with extensive agriculture and eventually developed extensive trade systems. However, Mauryan/ Gupta India emphasized trade and its economic importance while China, due to religious conflictions, allowed trade to occur, but never permitted it to become a main focus of their economy.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Period 3 Study Guide

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages

    C. The different philosophical ideas and religious ideas contributed to the differences. Confucianism affected the Han Dynasty by providing a sense of commonality between people, including filial piety, which allowed for more stability. The Mandate of Heaven was also a cause of a difference since this controlled who was the emperor and who wasn’t. The Roman Empire responded to crises by allowing their personal beliefs of warrior-based ethos, influenced by their gods, and had a dictator appointed for six months. However, the Chinese Han’s Confucian ideology allowed for more order or the loss of the Mandate of Heaven.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One thing that was a key aspect in both societies was religion. While the Han empire brought Confucianism as a main element in daily life, the Roman’s had several different religions that each played a key role. The Han empire trained bureaucrats formally in the teachings of Confucian philosophy. The Roman emperors were sometimes, after death, referred to as demigods. At the same time this was going on in the Roman empire, Jews and Christians were being persecuted.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    No matter where an empire is located, maintaining a vast empire always comes with many hardships, and the Roman and Chinese Empires were no exception. In the time of city-states, the Romans had developed a Republican form of government, which successfully met its needs. However, the Romans failed to develop a new form of government that catered to the demands of an expanding empire, resulting in the fall of the Republic, and Roman emperors were never able to develop an effective ideology of rule. Coupled with armies' loyalties to generals rather than the state, the empire was prone to bloody civil wars and frequent change in rulers who only reigned for several months or years. Also, the empire's obsession with expanding and protecting its borders also led to an increased demand for military service, after which many small farmers had no work, leading to growing populations stuck in poverty and prone to riots. Furthermore, these small farms, which used to produce grain, were replaced, and the empire had to rely on imported grain for sustenance. These events led to the third century crisis, in which the Roman Empire faced a period in which political, military, and economic problems nearly destroyed the empire. China, despite being located in a different hemisphere, faced incredibly similar problems. Both the Roman and Chinese Empires had significant political and social turmoil due to conflicts between independent regions over power. Because it was impossible to communicate any faster than the speed of a horse, empires relied on autonomous local leaders to maintain control. However, many local leaders and military generals being more interested in their own political power, which led to internal conflicts and civil wars. The expanding borders also required greater protection, and both of the administrative centers of these empires were located far from its long borders. In order to maintain and protect its borders, the…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han Dynasty Legacy

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The early Han Dynasty was ruled by Liu Bang. The Han also saw extreme cultural developments with confucianism which was compressed which had been minimized by Qin Dynasty. The Han Dynasty had a centralized government which was highly liked and ruled with dignity for about 400 years, ruling less than the Qin Dynasty. Than Han Dynasty was truly for the people doing everything as a government to see their people prosper giving tax breaks, hosting events and also exceeding research of human care. Early Han rulers expanded their empire almost to the size of modern China. Chinese society had an exceptional foundation. The emperor was at the top and a large body of officials reached down to the village. Han government replaced emphasis on legalism with confucianism created the civil service system. The qualifications required scholars to take an exam to serve as government officials under the empire, based on confusion leader, who should be chosen based on their ability. Under Han rule, Chinese developed their first golden age, the Pax Sinica. Other achievements were advancing the production of paper, chinese became very wealthy through trade, developed a monopoly on the production of slope. A golden age where there is peace and prosperity meaning wealth. During golden ages, civilizations developed achievements and discoveries. During this period, Chinese invented many inventions. Chinese also improved farming by creating a new tubulated plow. This change is important because the number of Chinese people have grown greatly. The Han emperors told their people farming is important work.The Han people were very aggressive and usually having full control over the mining of salt and the making of…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The idea of ruling a powerful government based on the principle of using two conflicting ideologies at the same time appeared foreign to most dynasties of early China. In early Chinese times, after the Period of the Warring States, two ideologies emerged: Legalism and Confucianism. Legalism stressed a strong central government that expressed harsh laws while Confucianism had a decentralized government, placing trust in conscientious and learned individuals to work together to solve political issues. These two schools of thought were in stark contrast to each other and, up until the Han dynasty, had never been combined with each other through government policy. The Qin dynasty, for example implemented a strict Legalist government while the Zhou dynasty applied a decentralized Confucianist government, which, as with the Qin dynasty, did not last long. As opposed to the Qin and Zhou dynasties, the combination of Legalist and Confucianist values led to a successful government in the Han dynasty because it gave way to a strong central government along with a rise in cultural and intellectual thinking while also checking each of the ideologies to prevent one from becoming too dominant.…

    • 1655 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays