ii. To carry or own a gun, citizens express the lack of trust in their enviroment.…
“A Peaceful Woman Explains Why She Carries a Gun” is an excerpt from Linda M. Hasselstrom’s essay Land Circle that details why and for what purpose she purchases a handgun and concealed carry permit. In the essay, Mrs. Hasselstrom recounts several instances where men disrespected and purposefully intimidated her in violent ways that truly scared her. Originally, Mrs. Hasselstrom took Kung Fu, but soon realized that if she was attacked by an average male, he could easily over power her just due to his superior size. Now armed with a gun at all times, Mrs. Hasselstrom’s interaction with belligerent man changed drastically. Men still acted disorderly and disregarded her polite requests to cease, but when she displayed her gun the whole overtone…
In “Just Take Away Their Guns,” by James Q. Wilson, Collins Professor of Management and Public Policy at the University of California at Los Angeles, the author shows what is wrong with each side of the argument. In the first paragraph, he says, “The president wants still tougher gun control legislation and thinks it will work” (Barnet and Bedau 124). But, he continues on to say how this will not affect the illegal use of guns. About 200 million privately own a gun and one-third of that 200 million own a handgun (Barnet and Bedau 124). Only two percent of the citizens are using them in unlawful acts (Barnet and Bedau 124). The number of people who defend themselves outnumbers the amount of arrests for crimes committed. There are many issues with gun control, such as, whether a citizen should be able to own a gun or not, law enforcement confiscations, and punishment for criminals who use guns.…
Just like when Mr. Jones and his men came back to try and win the farm back they had gun, the animals did not run they stood there and they fought them back that was not scared of the men and there guns. Just like that they laughed at Mr. Jones and his men that came back , they wasn't scared. If someone comes at you with a gun and tells you to beware, you might want to…
1. In paragraph one, Hasselstrom clearly states that she is “peace-loving” and due to past events she carries a pistol to be safe. She also wants to give valuable reasons on why people should carry pistols.…
For example, “ a number of researchers tell us that the number of suicides and homicides would be far smaller if the means to do so surely and easily complete a suicide weren’t there.” This is saying that if the guns were gone there would be less death by suicide and homicide. But, if a person has violent intents towards themselves or another, they will find a way to do this harm. The author chose to include the following statement in his article, many believe that police officers are trained to automatically assume that anyone and everyone is attempting to harm or kill them. By saying this, the author is saying that the ones who are trained to protects us are also the people have the mindset to kill everyone who looks remotely…
This existing policy of course is the second amendment. She explains how she highly agrees with the amendment but that people are seeing the amendment in the wrong way. The second amendment states “A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” The author also has no facts to be proven, her argument is mostly surrounded by opinion and belief. The only facts she really has are the most obvious to everyone: like a person who drives a car is licensed or the second amendment has the word militia in it.…
We have burglar alarms, cellular phones, laws and police forces, a powerful army, and technology has made us safer than ever. At the same time, technology has made us more vulnerable than ever before. A small group has the potential to wipe out millions of people with a single nuclear weapon. The fall of the Soviet Union has loosened the control over its existing nuclear weapons, and third-world countries can have nuclear arsenals. The threats from crime, terrorism, natural disaster, and weapons of mass destruction are real. If something were to happen today, you would need to have made a decision about the rifle you would select and be prepared for such an event.…
Natalie Portman, the actress behind the film Jane Got A Gun directed by Gavin O'Connor, expresses her concern about gun violence in the country. She may have played a gun-slinging cowgirl in her latest movie but she feels strongly about tighter gun laws.…
In the article “The Accessibility of Guns Lead to Gun Crime,” written by Alan M. Ruben apprises us that firearms have one sole purpose and that is to cause harm, meaning committing an injury, homicides, or suicides. Most people believe that owning a firearm gives the reassurance that they are protected and no harm can come to them. Ruben shows statistics that guns are not the most secures ways of bringing protection, but it can actually bring danger. “States with the highest level of gun ownership have 114 percent higher firearm murder rates and 60 percent higher total homicide rates than states with the lowest gun ownership”(Ruben). Gun ownership has shown that there is more danger being brought upon rather than protection. Statistics have made an estimate that not every gun owner is capable of having the responsibility of a firearm. “It is estimated that over 40 percent of gun acquisitions occurs in the secondary market. That means that they happen without any background whatsoever… guns show rank the second to corrupt dealers” (Ruben). Not every person who purchases a firearm are trustworthy, some may have a negative use instead of a greater purpose.…
Winker further urges that more research and work must be done to tame this issue and find better ways to evaluate and address gun control, safety, and education awareness. In a study aimed at tackling this issue, Emily Stark and Daniel Sachau performed nationally-representative survey to test if this phenomenon of firearms safety and use. This extensive survey considered people’s moral beliefs, political affiliations, gun control attitudes, gender, and firearm experience to ascertain any relevancies to these beliefs and people’s overestimation of their abilities as pertaining to firearms and safety. This study relied purely on self-reports. Stark predicted that male, pro-gun, and conservative participants would be more prone to the effect. The final sample 4,950 participants, primarily male, democrats were recruited through a Qualtrics survey across the US. Over 50% of people estimated they would be among the 90th percentile and 23% placed themselves in the top 1% of those able to be responsible gun owners. 65% of this population indicated they were above average in their knowledge of firearms and safety. Other findings…
According to the article carrying a firearm put community at risk , the author states “ Before we give a law enforcement officer the responsibility of carrying a firearm, we require that officer to extensive training” (Horwitz 1). The author is trying to say that carrying and using a gun is not for everybody or anybody who wishes to have it but for those who is ready and have been prepared for certain situation such as the officer. Moreover, Horwitz or the author says that” If you want to use firearm in your house, the risk is primarily to yourself and your family” ( Horwitz 1). This also saying that firearm can and will put anybody who used it at risk and not just that, people around them would be affected too, especially their family. The source that have been used in this paragraph is reliable and relevant because it directly talked about gun problems and how important it is to carefully controlling guns. He also gives some points that states why it is dangerous to the society. It is important to anyone who consider to own or use a gun that it can and will be risky and by means the government should have the power to control over who should have and buying…
Even if someone doesn’t have a bad record, that doesn’t mean that they are not bad people. It is very hard to tell if someone can be trusted while having a gun out in public. People should open carry, due to the fact that there is a lot of violence in this nation. According to the statistic in the article, Careful with the Panic: Violent Crime and Gun Crime Are Both Dropping, Gun crime was at its highest percentage in 1993, and has been declining since then. This decline in homicides is probably due to the fact that people got smart and started buying guns for protection. More Americans should own guns, not only because it is good protection, but if everyone knew how to at least shoot a gun, then some people would not be so afraid of them. “The first rule of not being a victim is not looking like a victim… The best way to avoid a fight is to look like you can win one”(Zimmerman). Most criminals will not mess with someone that they feel as if they could put up a fight. They want to pick out the weakest looking victim. A person carrying a gun in the open is not someone that a criminal would want to mess with most of the time. So that right there is another reason more people should openly carry a…
What would be going through your mind if you were in a restaurant and a mad man came in and began slaughtering people right and left including you family (Swasey 174)? Would you be thinking if they would ban guns this would have never happened? Probably not! What you were probably thinking is if I had a gun on me I could protect not only my family but also the others being slaughtered. This same scenario was on the mind of Suzanna Gratia as written in Elizabeth Swasey essay ”NRA Woman’s Voice”(174). People are starting to see a gun as an object of death and destruction, and not what they are intended to be.…
Kasler, P.A. (1992). Self-Reliance for self-defense- police protection isn’t enough! : Police Have No Duty…