Preview

A Psychological Experiment: A Stanford Prison Experiment

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
254 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Psychological Experiment: A Stanford Prison Experiment
A. Stanford Prison Experiment- In this experiment, students volunteered to be a part of a psychology experiment that was being conducted at Stanford College. Because of the situation around them, they conformed to the environment, even though it was only a simple experiment in a Stanford hallway. Embarrassed and yet impressed, the experimenters stated this, “The negative, anti-social reactions observed were not the product of an environment created by combining a collection of deviant personalities, but rather the result of intrinsically pathological situation which could distort and rechannel the behavior of essentially normal individuals” (Haney, et al. 1973, pg 90). All of the participants were in good health and sound mind at the beginning
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Stanford Prison Experiment Philip Zimbardo
    • 164 Words
    • 1 Page

    Stanford Prison Experiment Philip Zimbardo

    The Stanford Prison Experiment was an experiment that Philip Zimbardo evented. He wanted to study the human response of captivity, of the prison life. Zimbardo randomly assigned roles to the prisoners and the guards. Each role was uniquely identified. For example, he gave the guards sticks and sunglasses and the prisoners were arrested by the police department and were forced into the basement of the jail which was converted into the psychology department that was converted into a makeshift jail. Zimbardo wanted the experiment to be as realistic as he possibly could have made it, therefore, he assigned each role to help do so. Testing each individual and then assigning them to roles would of gave inconclusive readings and therefore, it was…

    • 164 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    How Did The Stanford Prison Experiment Affect Zimbardo's Behavior
    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages

    How Did The Stanford Prison Experiment Affect Zimbardo's Behavior

    In discussions of the Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Philip G. Zimbardo in 1970, one controversial issue has been whether or not the experiment should have ever been attempted. On the one hand, Dr. Zimbardo and his colleagues argued that the experiment gave them a deeper understanding of human suffering and a greater empathy for their fellow man (Ratnesar 2011). On the other hand, one of the former guards contended that the experiment made him more hostile and less sympathetic during his time as a guard and that the circumstances significantly altered his perception of what was appropriate behavior. Others even maintain that the prison experiment degraded the prisoners so greatly, empowered the guards to such a great extent, and even affected Dr. Zimbardo’s behavior and mannerisms so dramatically that it thoroughly altered their sense of…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Examples Of Dysfunction In The Stanford Prison Experiment
    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Examples Of Dysfunction In The Stanford Prison Experiment

    Another example of dysfunction in the stanford prison experiment was are that guy left they had to bring in someone…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Stanford Prison Experiment Analysis
    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Stanford Prison Experiment Analysis

    The articles “The Stanford Prison Experiment” written by Philip G. Zimbardo and “The My Lai Massacre: A Military Crime of Obedience” composed by Herbert C. Kelman and V. Lee Hamilton both focus on the effects of power. In which the subjects have been ordered to follow something by superiors. In the experiment the original group of subjects are divided into the role of guards, and inmates. The massacre, however, was not an experiment but was the result of an order issued by a higher ranking official. In comparison the movie A Few Good Men was used. This movie contained the same main underlying concepts as the articles which makes it a good comparison. Involved were two marine who were charged with murder of a fellow marine and the conspiracy…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Stanford Experiment Philip Zimbardo
    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Stanford Experiment Philip Zimbardo

    The Stanford Experiment is a study of experimental psychology conducted by Philip Zimbardo in 1971 on the effects of the prison situation. It was created with students playing the roles of guards and prisoners. It was intended to study the behavior of ordinary people in such a context and effect was to show that this was the situation rather that the personality of the participants who was at the origin of behaviours sometimes opposite the values professed by participants before the start of the study.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Stanford Prison Experiments Summary
    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Stanford Prison Experiments Summary

    Can good, moral, and virtuous people be pushed to do bad things? This article seeks to compare an experiment done in 1971 to a real life military situation during wartime. The article also tries to link the experiment to another horrible act done by someone suffering from various mental illnesses with extremely mixed results. Is there a correlation between these three events as far as the mental states of the participants?…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment: Zimbardo And Le Bon
    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Stanford Prison Experiment: Zimbardo And Le Bon

    Have you ever noticed that certain people act and behave differently when they are with crowds versus when they are alone? Being in a large crowd can really impact individual to act in a certain way that they seem to fit in with the group and sometimes do things more anonymous as it is in a large crowd. Both Zimbardo and Le Bon believe that bystanders are less responsible and more likely to commit violence than when people are alone. Philip Zimbardo is a psychologist and a professor at Stanford University; he researches the cause of evil in people by doing a Stanford prison experiment. Zimbardo states about how evil can cause good people easily by the peers that they are surrounded by and the culture and traditional way changes can affect people…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment: The Power Of Government
    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Stanford Prison Experiment: The Power Of Government

    The idea of government has been around for centuries. It has changed and expanded so much over the years that certain governments have morphed into a more violent institution, in some cases. Because governments have changed so much over the years, certain governments have slowly evolved to become extreme, and may be considered seriously dangerous in the future.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Stanford Prison Experiment Zimbardo
    • 176 Words
    • 1 Page

    Stanford Prison Experiment Zimbardo

    The Stanford Prison Experiment began just like any other, with a general question: “Would a negative environment would be able to control…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Malcolm Gladwell Power Of Context Analysis
    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Malcolm Gladwell Power Of Context Analysis

    One of the experiments is the Stanford University prison experiment. This experiment was performed by Philip Zimbardo and a group of scientists wanted to see how normal people would act once they were put into a prison environment for two weeks whether they are a guard or a prisoner. The experiment was cut down to 6 days because of the information that the scientist discovered. Gladwell exclaimed “What Zimbardo found out shocked him. The guards, some whole previously identified themselves as pacifists, fell quickly into the role of hard-bitten disciplinarians” (Gladwell 158). Both the prisoners and the guards lost their identities and were reforming to the lifestyle and beliefs of actual prisoners and prison guards. The “prisoners” actually felt like they were in prison and became emotionally distraught and the guards became strict disciplinarians and lost their morals. When the people were put into the environment of a prison, they reverted from their morals and even led to them changing. Stout talks about this epidemic as well, she says “All human beings have the capacity to dissociate psychologically, though most of us are unaware of this, and consider “out-of-body” episodes to be far beyond the boundaries of our normal experience. In fact, dissociative experiences happen to everyone, and most of these events are quite…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Zimbardo And The Stanford Prison Experiment
    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Zimbardo And The Stanford Prison Experiment

    Most people desire some sort of power. Whether it is political power or economic power, this yearning runs our society. Some people use their power to benefit others, and other person inappropriately use their power to degrade and diminish. As explored in the Stanford Prison Experiment, Philip Zimbardo states people change with they are given “power without oversight” (Zimbardo, The Psychology of Evil, TedTalk). Though the students were considered “good apples,” the combination of situation and the system caused the guards to lose their identities and to abuse their power in inhumane ways. The results of the experiment were derived many observations and conclusions about the subjects; however, Zimbardo’s switch between running the experiment…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment Comparison Essay
    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Stanford Prison Experiment Comparison Essay

    Experiments have been done for many more years than humans can count on the two hands in which they possess. Two experiments, in particular, were written, “The Stanford Prison Experiment” by Philip G. Zimbardo and “The Perils of Obedience” by Stanley Milgram. These experiments can be controversial for many different reasons, but neither of these experiments were completed under conditions of normality. The information collected in these experiments isn’t exactly based off of real life situations, it becomes difficult not to question the relevance of these experiments.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Stanford Prison Experiment Essay Example
    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Stanford Prison Experiment Essay Example

    Those involved had forgotten they were playing a role. The prisoners were "behaving in pathological ways" and no longer realized that they were free to quit at anytime (Zimbardo, 2006). The guards had either become sadistic or allowed the behavior, believing that they were unable to do anything about it; and as previously stated, even the researchers playing a role had begun to lose their grip on reality (Zimbardo, 2006). This experiment showed just how detrimental inhumane prison conditions were to the health of everyone in the prison system from Super-Intendents to guards and prisoners.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Apa Code Of Ethics Essay
    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Apa Code Of Ethics Essay

    For Instance, The Stanford Prison Experiment carry out by Haney, Banks & Zimbardo is known for its significant study but also its violation of ethics in psychology (Haney, Banks & Zimbardo, 1973). The concept of this experiment was to determine the role of conformity in an experiment act to establish the correlation between prison guards and prisoners in the prison system(Haney, Banks & Zimbardo, 1973). Although, its success, the experiment received immense condemnation due to the ethical violations that occurred during the experiment. Philip Zimbardo failed to stop the experiment as soon as it was getting out of hand. Zimbardo and his colleagues were determining to see how far the experiment could go they failed to see the damage it was doing to their…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dehumanization Of The Stanford Prison Experiment
    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Dehumanization Of The Stanford Prison Experiment

    The Abu Ghirab prison was the most horrific, brutal and dehumanizing thing I have even come across. The level of suffering the inmates experienced words cannot express how terrifying it is. There were male as well as female and even worst, children was in that dreadful place. They were treated worse than animals in my opinion, I cannot see in no one lives they should have to encounter such gruesome experience. The Stanford prison experiment was conducted on August 14th to 20th, 1971.The team of researchers were led by professor Phillip Zimbardo.This experiment was conducted with college students. This experiment was also dehumanizing although the prisoners were forced to engage in many events, such as defecating in buckets and used their hands…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics