Preview

A Quilt Of A Country Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1008 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Quilt Of A Country Summary
Looking at two similar, yet different, articles “A Quilt of a Country”, by Anna Quindlen, and the other, “The Immigrant Contribution”, by John F. Kennedy. It may have been hard, but we can tell some important things to you that you might have missed. While reading these articles, we found big differences between the two. Some people might say these are too similar to tell a difference. Well, let me to you something, both articles seem very similar with a glance, however, they both have many differences that can be seen if you look hard enough. Let’s compare and contrast these relations and divergences that we chose from these writings. Both authors have the same ideas and like to share on how they write it. One of these ideas is that they both show mutual encouragement for unity. This similarity should be rather easy to spot. The fact that both Quindlen and Kennedy have the same ideas, and express them rather roughly the same, they can be compared with some effort. An excellent example that we found in Quindlen’s writing is this quote: “One of …show more content…
Let’s take a look at some that we found. While looking at both articles, we found that Quinlan's article talks more about terrorism, and Kennedy’s article talks about people hoping to climb the social ladder. By terrorism, we mean events like 9/11, and Quindlen even talks about the world wars, the cold war, even communism, ere she talks about this act of agroterrorism (Quindlen 15). For Kennedy’s side, we found that he talks more about the spirit of equality in all immigrants and where they came from. Once again, there are multiple different occurrences of this, so sourcing them all would be a bit of a pain. Kennedy never talks about wars, or terrorism, or anything of the sort. The same could go for Quindlen, as she never talks about the wishes of the people she is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    John F. Kennedy’s inauguration speech, a speech that gave his plans for the next four years of presidency, and unified all american citizens under one idea. Fifty years later, writer Eleanor Clift published an essay about her beliefs which she meant to show how the united states as a whole failed to carry on JFK’s legacy. JFK’s inaugural speech was very hopeful and positive, while Clift’s essay, “Inside Kennedy’s Inauguration, 50 years on”, was very rueful and somber. Although their purposes and tones contrast, the way that they both use different rhetorical devices makes it so they share one comparison, they both speak to the same audience.…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    He continues by elaborating about and creating pledges with anaphora to further appeal to the American citizens’ emotions. “To those old allies”, “To those new states”, “To those people in huts and villages”, “To our sister republics south of our border”, and “To that world assembly of sovereign states, the United Nations” tie the world together through the pledges that follow this anaphora that Kennedy makes in the name of America. “Let both sides explore”, “Let both sides, for the first time, formulate”, “Let both sides seek to invoke”, and “Let both sides unite” was declared by Kennedy shortly after to show how “both sides” should come together also in rhythmic, catchy application of…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compare and Contrast In, “A Quilt of Our Country” by Anna Quindlen, she tells about how our country is like a “crazy quilt” because everything on it is different but still tied together. In, “An Immigrant Contribution” by John F. Kennedy, he talks about immigrants in the U.S. and how they change our life. These articles both have different views on the same topic and are expressed differently. John F. Kennedy had a more “real life” view of American immigration oppression obsession; Quindlen had a more relaxed “aside the fact” approach by comparing it to a quilt.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By using theses rhetorical devices in his writing John F. Kennedy’s speech make its more memorable and more powerful.As it implies deeper though and invokes to think in unity rather than for only ourselfs but think of all the people in the coutnry.He wanted us to think farther into the future than just in his term or their lives but rather in the continuty of the Nation as a…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    By bringing up the topic of revolution and mentioning all the hardships people have gone through, Kennedy appeals to the American citizens’ sense of nationalism and pride. Another instance where Kennedy applies pathos is when he says, “In your hands, my fellow citizens, more than mine, will rest the final success or failure of our course. Since this country was founded, each generation of Americans has been summoned to give testimony to its national loyalty…Now the trumpet sounds again…--a struggle against the common enemies of man: tyranny, poverty, disease and war itself.” (70). Here, Kennedy says how the course of the country lies with the citizens of America and how they need to cooperate to fight “the common enemies of man”. This makes the citizens feel important and want to actually do something themselves to help. Also, when Kennedy mentions how every generation of Americans have been required to defend against enemies, he, again, appeals to the nationalism and pride of American citizens. The third place where Kennedy appeals to emotion is when he says…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There, Rose interviews and observes the lives of those who have direct experiences with the immigration issue at the border where she gains two different perspectives. There are those who feel that everyone should be treated with compassion regardless of the circumstances and there are those whom she interviews that support the federal law of placing restrictions on strangers who want to cross the border. Although Rose does not favor one side over the other, it is clear to recognize that her compassion is with the immigrants. Rose criticizes and attacks the way in which immigration laws provoke the mass deaths of immigrants at the border and specifically argues that the border creates a human binary of acceptance from those who are included and those who are excluded. Rose’s purpose of the book is to challenge one’s own opinion and views regarding this controversial question. “My aim in these pages has not been to take sides but rather to try to approach the problem in a disinterested fashion; to try to play a bit of the devil’s advocate all around; to see the merits and flaws behind clashing philosophies”…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Samuel argues that the contiguity encourages immigration and that it has steadily been increasing. The number of immigrants coming from Mexico is an overwhelming population. “The most important element of American identity was its capacity to be built through the successful synthesis of people with nationally diverse origins into a new American identity” (Fraga, Segura 280). The influx of immigrants helped this nation become what it is today, the United States of America. Where people come from should not become an issue as long as we all have the same goal: to adapt to the Constitution and help the U.S remain a great and successful country.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Quindlen's Quote Analysis

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This shows that there are similarities even in the differences. “Every ethnic minority, in seeking its own freedom, helped strengthen the fabric of liberty in American life” (Kennedy, 24). This describes that the new immigrants basically strengthened America's diversity which also lead to the strengthening of our equality which was viewed much differently in Kennedy’s writing than Quindlen’s. In Kennedy’s quote his tone is flat, informative yet he manages to spike it up by using abstract diction in the words, “fabric of liberty”. This gives the writing some flavor that wasn’t tasted before. In Quindlen’s quote however it is intriguing with it’s usage of word choice, her diction may be plain but it holds a strong emotion that Kennedy just can’t seem to get a hold of in his formal writing. In the end these are just some of the differences in Quindlen and Kennedy’s writings, yet in the end they both agree that our differences are what make us who we are as a…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kennedy reached his audience on a personal level when he addressed himself as an equal to the people and stated “we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, and oppose any foe, in order to assure the survival and the success of liberty.” As he said this, he related to the people by showing them that they were all suffering the same hardships, and his tone is made sincere, serious, and willing in that he will do what he must for his people. The use of parallelism through the statement “Let both sides explore…” “Let both sides seek…” and “Let both sides unite…” also emitted an inspiring feel that ensured the people that he was in the fight for improvement with them, and prepared to do what it took for a better tomorrow. As he did so, he was…

    • 976 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the essay “ Quilt of Country “ by Anna Quindlen, argues that having a common enemy and having a nation built with divergent pieces are the forces and ideas that connect the people of the United States. She communicates this argument by giving the reader informational facts and quotes. Quindlen invokes that America as a mongrel nation due to how distinct people have made up our country, “ a great national striving consisting frequently of failure.” Our community has been in constant conflict by cause of our different backgrounds and this hurts our idea of unity. Quindlen also states that tragedy brings us to unity, “ Terrorism has led to devastation “ the 9/11 attack caused damaged to the people of America ,…

    • 181 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Specifically, he maintains that the Immigration Act of 1965 has triggered a mass immigration consisting of migrants that are significantly different in ethnic origin from the resident population and that this migration is causing a radical change in the demographic composition of the population which will lead to a breakdown in the ties that bind the nation together. Furthermore, he suggests that this migration policy, which is designed to be free of any trace of racism or xenophobia, is not only creating an alien nation, but is doing so despite the wishes of the majority of the current resident population. The author also makes the case that immigration is, and always has been, of much less importance to American economic growth than is conventionally assumed.” (Brim low P 1995)…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Anna Quindlen

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The primary purpose portrayed through Quindlen's writing is the complete and all-encompassing celebration of life. Quindlen is not supporting or denying a women's right to choose whether or not she should have an abortion. Here we find a sole voice crying out to the masses. Those who have not been placed in such a predicament and are confronted with someone who has seen or experienced both sides of the issue and is seemingly trying to encourage these young people to think wisely about the main issue that is being confronted. Her primary purpose is proven to be true because of the strategies that she uses.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    All three anti-racial activists share similar aspects on the way they view their community, but also have several differences on how they react towards it. From same backgrounds, different time periods, and different places of the United States, they each shared one major quality. They wanted to be heard and stand up for what was right for society through studies, poetry, anti-racial clubs, etc.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King constantly brings up the idea of hope for African American citizens while also bringing up the injustice done to them. Obama constantly brings up the idea of peace among the citizens of Ferguson and strides for anti-violence. The style of King and Obama is very similar the both use repetition to express their ideas.…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    His most masterful use of this strategy comes when he uses more than three different types in just one sentence, “Two thousand years ago, two thousand years ago, the proudest boast was, ‘civis Romanus sum.’ Today, in the world of freedom, the proudest boast is “Ich bin ein Berliner.” In this statement, Kennedy is most impactful by using parallelism and likening his boast, “Ich bin ein Berliner.” , to one of Marcus Tullius Cicero’s, “civis Romanus sum”. Not only do these two boasts essentially mean the same thing, but they were both spoken as a plea for the rights of citizens in their respective countries, centuries apart. Another example of Kennedy’s use of a rhetorical device comes when he says, “Freedom has many difficulties and democracy is not perfect.” Here, Kennedy is offering a concession to the proponents of communism. He knows that there are individuals who believe that “communism is the future” and he wants to make it difficult for them to present a counterargument against his promotion of capitalism. At the end of that statement, Kennedy strengthens the tangibility of his appeal by saying, “But we have never had to put a wall up to keep our people in to prevent them from leaving us.” Another form of rhetorical devices Kennedy takes advantage of in his speech are metaphors. One example of this is when he says, “You live in a defended island of freedom, but your life is part of the main. . . . beyond the wall to the day of peace with justice, beyond yourselves and ourselves to all mankind.” By saying this, Kennedy is using metaphorical language to appeal to the greater good by asking the citizens to not think of this as only being about the human rights of Berlin, or even German, instead, he wants them to think about this as being about the collective human rights of all…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics