Kubic's Article on Manifest Destiny had a very strong structure and proofing system. Thus, Kubic builds his argument through recalling historical events and providing quotes from that time period to effectively show how the manifest destiny justified dishonorable and ignominious actions done by the united states. First the Author talks about Jefferson and his opinion on Native Americans. He describes how Jefferson thought the way he treated the Natives was with Kid glove. He includes Notes of the State of Virginia, which is a book written by Jefferson back in 1785.…
The documentary “Indians, Outlaws and Angie Debo” shows Angie Debo as a 98-year old lady, reflecting on her experiences in life. In the documentary she talks about Oklahoma´s history of depriving its five Native American tribes of their land and resources in the 1930s from the perspective of the displaced. Native Americans during this time were seen more than ever as a bounded group by the European Anglo-Americans [in the following analysis, the dominant European Anglo-American group is referred to as whites to simplify the reading]. In comparison to whites who felt superior and avowed to themselves the power to dominate the inferior race, the Native Americans were ascribed a strongly subordinated position in society and were treated in a discriminatory way by the whites.…
Mrs. Mary Rowlandson in the excerpt, The Sovereignty and Goodness of God, asserts that Native Americans are barbarous savages; only the grace of God guided the author to survival. Rowlandson supports her claim by illustrating the bloody attacks the Natives led against the colonists and the deaths of her closest family members and friends. The author’s purpose is to expose the cruelties of the Native Americans in order to persuade all educated colonists that Native Americans are cruel, not friendly, and cannot be cooperated with. Therefore, the author writes in a grieving and anguished tone for all educated white colonists with mixed knowledge and perspectives on the trustworthiness of Native Americans.…
In this sentence from John Green’s Looking for Alaska, the speaker's attitude toward the party is best described as indifferent. The speaker’s tone and diction implies that he lacks interest or concern in the unsuccessful party that was thrown for him. He mentions how “he could feel their pity”, but then goes on to say that “they needed more pity than I did”. This shows how although his parents pitied him for not having friends, he did not pity himself, but instead felt bad for his hopeful parents. The way the speaker describes his friends as “Imaginary” displays that he is an introvert who does not have any friends, and that the people his parents were expecting to show did not actually exist. His parents had high hopes and expectations…
The stories Columbus, the Indians, and Human Progress and A Patriot’s History of the United States have a greater difference than they do similarities. Each story has a different tale of how Native Americans were treated by the Europeans. One story told of gallons of bloodshed, torture, enslavement, and overworked Indians, while the other one told of glorified Europeans here to help their fellow man. Even though, both stories had their differences; they do tell of a similar time in which explorers reach the New World and start to establish colonies. The explorers also tried to convert the Indian tribes to Christianity.…
All through the historical backdrop of the New World, there has been strife between indigenous populaces and approaching pioneers that usurp the land and assets. The uncovered histories and ficticious belief surrounding the Trail of Tears and the victory of the Incas and other local societies reminds us as readers that genocide and ethnic purifying leaves a sign of an awesome misfortune on American…
At the Exposition, Native Americans served a dual purpose, albeit a contradicting one. While they were showcased as objects of civility and Christianity, Native Americans were also portrayed in the exact opposite manner of civility and Christianity: barbarity and savagery. Rydell’s argument, while effective, loses some of the nuance of the reactions by government agents regarding the deliberate contradiction of the Native American presence at the Exposition. Some government agents, particularly those connected to military affairs, appear to have reacted indifferently towards the apparent contradiction and in fact seemed more concerned with menial issues than the stalling of Native American “progression.” Yet, other government agents, particularly those more invested in the advancement and assimilation of Native Americans, expressed similar concerns to those suggested by…
Respect is shown to the Governor and the whites at the beginning by Chief Seattle because he approaches them in a friendly manner which shows he understands white’s superior status. The choice of diction really helps persuade the governor especially when he refers to him as “the great, and 'the good white chief” throughout the text. Chief Seattle's goal here is to make the governor support his oration despite the underlying mocking of the whites and their intelligence. When the Chief takes full responsibility on the plight of his people this causes him to gain respect and admirability of the Governor even though most likely he felt quite opposite of this the Chief knew his goal was to persuade the Governor and thats exactly what he was doing. Another way he tried to gain the Governor’s support was when he blames his own Native soldiers during the warfare between them and the whites saying their “hearts are black” to show that he knows that his people are wrong. Chief Seattle knows exactly what he is doing with every word he attempts to tell the Americans what they want to hear this shows how easily it was to influence the whites and despite the fact the Natives were “inferior” they were very underestimated by the whites.another method used by the chief was to increase his credibility when he uses a simile saying “my words are like stars that never change,”(line3) this shows the Governor that he is willing to cooperate with the whites. Throughout…
Mayas and Aztecs were polytheistic and believed in sacrifices. The Timuquans and Natchez worshiped the sun. All the tribes got married to the person the family picked for them.…
How can some people live in endless misery and not have any hope for the future and the good things to come? In America, Claud McKay describes America as a woman who is treacherous and someone who continually puts him down. America does many terrible things to the narrator, but he still loves her and the goodness she can bring. America is his home no matter what she does. By showing how the narrator perseveres through all the awful things that America throws at him, I can infer that the message the narrator is trying to put out is that if we fight for the good things in life, we can achieve anything. America is personified as someone who treats the narrator as if he is nothing, expendable, and only worth the punishment she gives him. She makes everything harder for the narrator and constantly gives him reasons to give up, but he still fights on and keeps hoping to receive the reward of the American Dream. If no one ever looked on the bright side of things and persevered through the bad, no one would ever achieve the American Dream. Because the narrator is still persistent, and keeps hoping, he will soon be rewarded with the beautiful things about America and not…
The use of diction in this speech is very significant in the act of identifying the purpose of Chief Seattle’s oration. Seattle uses words like, White chief, Big Chief, extensive, reproach, etc. to convey a certain mood. Seattle also uses color to distinguish or evoke different meanings, and also many other words to emphasize separations and…
“It has been said that America will never be right until they right themselves with the American Indian. America must now seize this historic opportunity to deal honorably with the Native Peoples on the issue of Restitution, Reparations and Restoration of Lands that guarantees Indian people a future in America. “…
Native Americans have felt distress from societal and governmental interactions for hundreds of years. American Indian protests against these pressures date back to the colonial period. Broken treaties, removal policies, acculturation, and assimilation have scarred the indigenous societies of the United States. These policies and the continued oppression of the native communities produced an atmosphere of heightened tension. Governmental pressure for assimilation and their apparent aim to destroy cultures, communities, and identities through policies gave the native people a reason to fight. The unanticipated consequence was the subsequent creation of a pan-American Indian identity of the 1960s. These factors combined with poverty, racism, and prolonged discrimination fueled a resentment that had been present in Indian communities for many years. In 1968, the formation of the American Indian Movement took place to tackle the situation and position of Native Americans in society. This movement gave way to a series of radical protests, which were designed to draw awareness to the concerns of American Indians and to compel the federal government to act on their behalf. The movement's major events were the occupation of Alcatraz, Mount Rushmore, The Trail of Broken Treaties, and Wounded Knee II. These AIM efforts in the 1960s and 1970s era of protest contained many sociological theories that helped and hindered the Native Americans success. The Governments continued repression of the Native Americans assisted in the more radicalized approach of the American Indian Movement. Radical tactics combined with media attention stained the AIM and their effectiveness. Native militancy became a repertoire of action along with adopted strategies from the Civil Rights Movement. In this essay, I will explain the formation of AIM and their major events, while revealing that this identity based social movement's…
Thesis: Modern Native American traditions reflect the history of struggle, strife and triumph they experienced in history.…
Chief Seattle’s diction reflects his sorrow and passion in regards to selling the land. The purpose of the speech was to persuade the “The Great Chief of Washington” on how important the land was to his people. With vivid description, history and memories he was able to contract the difference between the Indians love of the land and the white man ignorance of the land by saying, “The earth is not his brother, but his enemy, and when he has conquered it, he moves on. He leaves his father’s grave behind, and he does not care.” These words illustrated the great respect and the different morals toward each family. He condemns the white man for moving away from their land which displays the disrespect they have for their dead.…