Preview

A Vindication Of The Rights Of Brutes By Peter Singer

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
268 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Vindication Of The Rights Of Brutes By Peter Singer
In one of Peter Singer’s arguments defending animals rights he counter argues against Thomas Taylor a philosopher who wrote A Vindication of the Rights of Brutes which was a counterargument against Mary Wollstonecraft (Singer, 1). In Singer’s reply to Taylor he says that one might reply by saying the case for equality between men and women cannot be given to non-human animals (Singer, 2). To summarize this argument, Singer says that women are just as intelligent and capable of voting as men so they are extended this right, while dogs are not mentally capable of recognizing and understanding the significance of voting so they are not given this right (Singer, 2). He then goes onto say that men and women resemble each other closely therefore

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Lindqvist has written more than thirty books of essays, aphorisms, autobiography, documentary prose, travel and reportage..[4][3] He occasionally publishes articles in the Swedish press, writing for the cultural supplement of the largest Swedish daily, Dagens Nyheter, since 1950.[5] He is the recipient of several of Sweden's most prestigious literary and journalistic awards.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    More than three decades ago Peter Singer heralded the need for a new kind of liberation movement, one calling for a radical expansion of the human moral canvas and more importantly, a rejection of the horrors human beings have inflicted for millennia upon other sentient beings, treatment historically considered as being both natural and unalterable. Often regarded as being the father of the modern animal liberation movement, Singer contends that the campaign for animal liberation today is analogous to the struggles for racial and gender justice of the past. (1976, p. 34-36) This essay will attempt to highlight the distinctions made by Singer between sentience and self-conciousness and what implications such a distinction suggests for the moral status of animals. Furthermore, this essay will attempt to identify and contrast the moral status of animals with that of human animals and identify the bases of such standing in ethical deliberation.…

    • 1819 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Much thanks to Jeremy Rifkin for showing us that science supports what we pet owners and animal rights activists have known in our hearts all along: animals have feelings and abilities not very different from humans. I found the stories about Koko the gorilla who is fluent in sign language, and Betty and Abel, the tool-making crows, intriguing and heart-warming. When will more people begin to realize that we share this world with many creatures deserving of our care and respect? However, Rifkin should take his argument farther. Animals have a right to live without being confined, exploited, tormented or eaten.…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Ultimate Punishment, Van Den Haag talks about the death penalty in the United States and takes the stance that it is morally justifiable and sometimes needs to be a punishment that is used to gain retribution. He states, “It ends the existence of those punished, instead of temporarily imprisoning them.” A murderer has taken away the lives of other people, as well as punishing the family members indirectly causing them pain. Therefore not only is this retribution to the person who was killed, but also to the people that the victim was survived by.…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Execute the Brutes

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Sven Lindqvist's book, "Exterminate All the Brutes", explains and informs people of the many things they might now already know, most specifically about the history of genocide, and to display some of the messages based on these events and actions that had happened throughout the history of the European continent and parts of our world. I wholeheartedly agree with the undisputed message to the reader that all humans have done is exterminate the brutes, or lower races, starting at the beginning of humankind and going all of the way to the Holocaust. False scientific reasoning and theories have placed this idea subliminally into our minds. Human’s turned a blind eye to a lot of the atrocities happening because they were not committing these horrendous acts themselves, and ultimately believed that these conquests for expansion and extermination would lead them to a better future in their mind.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals deserve rights because just like humans, they feel excruciating pain, suffer and have feelings. One would argue that animals don’t experience emotions? But the answer is of course they do. It is emotions that allow animals to display various behavior patterns. According to the theory of utilitarianism, all sentient beings should be given consideration in the society and this includes both animals and humans. Also, animals cannot speak for themselves and for this reason they should be treated equally, protected and given the same respect as human beings. Peter singer’s approach also supports the argument on equal consideration in that animals deserve the same respect as human beings but just in a different view. In today’s society humans exploit animals for milk, meat, fur, scientific experimentation etc. and animals are constantly injured or killed. Their pain and sufferings should be taken into consideration, as this unjust treatment is morally unacceptable. Similarly speciesism is an…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rhetorical Devices

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In Speciesism and Moral Status, Singer employs formal yet common terminology that is easy to understand in order to persuade his readers to see his point of view, whereas in Liberté, Égalité, Animalité: Human-Animal Comparisons in Law, Peters uses formal terminology that has more of a basis in law, which would be confusing to the common reader, because this paper is not meant for persuasion. For example, in Speciesism and Moral Status, Singer states that “In the case of applying this to people with severe and profound cognitive disabilities, there is also a problem about saying who the ‘‘we’’ are” (Singer 572). In this example, Singer uses careful, formal diction when approaching a controversial topic: comparing people with “profound mental disabilities” to animals with high mental…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the early times, burglary was a crime of precise definition and only under certain circumstances were acts considered criminal. Furthermore, burglary was originally defined in the old common law as “breaking and entering into the dwelling or structure of another at night with an intent to commit a felony inside”. At present, by court decisions and regulation, the characterization of the crime of burglary has evolved to include many more accurate situations. To common law writers the above progression made sense because the expansion of the original concept of security of the dwelling was in response to social…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phil. outline

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A. Singer reflects his statements in Animal Liberation “The basic principle of equality does not require equal or identical treatment; it requires equal consideration.”…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion.” (Article18). In the book thief by Markus Zusak this article was violated many times by Hitler and other characters. Hitler and the torture that he brought to characters such as Max, Liesel, and Hans violate many articles such as article 18 in the UDHR. These characters were not given the right to freedom of religion. Or given the chance to stand up for what they believe is right. Or even given the privacy they deserve in their own homes. However all of these characters must learn to change and adapt to life in this new cruel world.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    week 2 DQ 1&2

    • 663 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Singer argues that there is no moral justification for denying moral consideration to animals. Can you think of a reason why our moral consideration should include all humans regardless of their level of cognitive ability, yet denied to non-human animals simply because they have lower levels of cognitive abilities (though still higher in some cases than those of human infants and some mentally disabled humans)? What response might he have to your way of drawing the line between the types of beings that should get moral consideration and those that should not?…

    • 663 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tom Regan's Position

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages

    An Argumentative essay that looks at and breaks down the philosophical difference between Tom Regan’s position on Animal rights and, Peter Singer’s position on Animal liberation as a basis for better treatment of animals.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Peter Singers All Animals Are Equal, he claims we should give the same respect the lives of non human animals as we give the lives of humans and that all animals human and non-human are in fact equal. I agree with him because there is no reason as to why animals should not get the same rights and respect as us. Animals have interest, when these are similar to ours, or their pain is on a similar level why give them less consideration. All human and animals have similar feelings such as loving something or feeling pain when they get hurt. I agree with Singer in what he says when animals should be given the same respect and treated equally.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. What does Singer mean by saying that all animals are equal? What does he mean by "speciesism," and how is it like racism and sexism?…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determining the rights of non-human animals and deciding how to treat them may not be a choice available to our human society. As an advocate for the rights of animals, Tom Reganʻs three main goals are to abandon the use of animals in any scientific research, discontinue all commercial animal agriculture, and to completely terminate both commercial and sport animal hunting. To support these intentions, Regan argues that every human and non-human animal possesses inherent value, which makes them all more than a physical object or vessel. He then states that possessing inherent value allows every human and non-human to have rights of their own. To further his argument, Regan claims that the any human and non-human retaining rights requires equal treatment and respect from others. To conclude his argument, Regan states that due to these reasons, non-human animals cannot be treated as resources and must be treated by humans as equals. In this paper, I object to Reganʻs third premise, which states that non-human and human animals must be treated as equals and with respect, because our communication barrier with non-human animals restricts us from determining their notion of equal treatment or respect, and that attempting to do so could…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays