Preview

A2 Level History Complete Guide

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
48155 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A2 Level History Complete Guide
REVISION GUIDE
Making Of Modern Britain,
1951-2007

BRITAIN IN 1951

POLITICS

Three key turning points during this period * 1951 election > start of 13 years Conservative rule * 1979 election > start of Thatcher dominance lasting 11 years * 1997 election > start of New Labour dominance (so far 13 years)

1951 saw end of Labour and Attlee in government – had achieved all promises outlined in 1945 election manifesto and legacy remains for (arguably) twenty years. Impact on society and politics until mid 1970’s despite Conservative dominance, and Welfare State and NHS continue to date.

1951-1997 – Conservatives ‘natural party of government’ for 35 of the 46 years. Labour Party showed a mentality of an opposition party rather than governing party (even when in power) until Blair arrived.

Two party electoral system 1951 onwards: Labour and Conservatives enjoy near total dominance of politics. Due in part to the FPTP electoral system effects as well as the insignificance of Liberals, lack of parliamentary support for nationalists, and negligible impact of other smaller parties.
Rise of consensus politics – political gulf between major parties narrower than ever before. Labour moderate and patriotic (not extreme socialism as expected) and key policy makers in Conservatives were ‘One Nation Tories’ (reformist) keen to build on national cooperation to maintain an essential post war consensus.

ECONOMY
Contradictions: a curious mixture of difficulties and decline versus optimism and growth

Huge difficulties – damaged infrastructure, saddled with massive debts, pre-war markets lost, old staple industries in decline, Britain reliant on US to begin economic recovery, key industries (coal, steel, rail) had been nationalised by Attlee (hopes of faster modernisation), many consumer goods scarce and expensive, rationing only just coming to an end. Britain sliding down the league tables of the world economy 1951-2007 –
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Explain why the Cpnservatives won the General Election of 1959
    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Explain why the Cpnservatives won the General Election of 1959

    WW2 made a huge dent in Britain’s economic capability in terms of international trade and the fact that half of our factories had been converted to build military equipment. Not long before the General Election the economy had begun to pick up.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    To What Extent Was Whig/Liberal Dominance In The Period 1846-68
    • 2523 Words
    • 11 Pages

    To What Extent Was Whig/Liberal Dominance In The Period 1846-68

    Between the years 1846 and 1868, the Conservative party was only in power for a total of just under four years – 1852, 1858-97 and 1866-68. Throughout these short-lived periods, they were never able to achieve a majority and this illustrates and defines the extent of Whig/Liberal dominance in this period. Their dominance was without doubt partially as a result of their free-trade agenda, but other factors, such as other policies the grouping made in this period, the gravitation of the Peelites towards the Whigs, the growth of popular Liberalism, the work of specific individuals and the weakness of the Conservatives also caused their dominance in this period.…

    • 2523 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Do You Agree with the View That the Conservative Party’s Policies in the Years 1951-59 “Hindered the Country’s Economic Development”?
    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Do You Agree with the View That the Conservative Party’s Policies in the Years 1951-59 “Hindered the Country’s Economic Development”?

    The Conservative Party which was leaded by Winston Churchill (1951-55) and Anthony Eden (1955-57) and Harold Macmillan (1957-63) between the years 1951-59 wanted, according to their manifesto in 1951, to stop all further nationalisation. The Iron and Steel Act will be repealed and the Steel industry allowed resuming its achievements of the war and post-war years. To supervise prices and development we shall revive, if necessary with added powers, the former Iron and Steel Board representing the State, the management, labour, and consumers. They also wanted to free the people from austerity and housing shortages. Macmillan introduced the stop and go economy. If the domestic consumption and the prices rose too quickly (and the economy appeared to be “overheating”) the government put on the “brakes” by increasing taxes and raising interest rates. This would make it more difficult to borrow money. The other way around would be, when the production and the exports declined, and the economy appeared to be a “downturn”, the government pressed the “accelerator” button by cutting and lowering the interest rates. This would make it easier to borrow money. There was also the “Stop-Go” approach. This approach was to try and solve the main two problems of maintaining economic growth which were keeping inflation low and making sure there was a healthy balance of payments. But this policy was not coherent. The budgets were used to buy votes and it also caused mixed success. One result was “Stagflation” (Stagnation and Inflation). It was a failure to invest in the long term R & D (Research and Development). Britain also started to lag behind because of the heavy defence expenditure and the expensive nuclear arms development programme. Also 35 per cent of the Research and Development were spent on the defence. But this face the rise in living standards (50%) and material prosperity, the wages raised ahead the pries, there was a greater availability of a credit, house buying grew…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    What Were the Two Greatest Sucesses and Failures of the Wilson Government
    • 1722 Words
    • 7 Pages

    What Were the Two Greatest Sucesses and Failures of the Wilson Government

    Wilson had been voted into government with the promise of central planning and “the white heat of new technology”, catching the mood of the moment, and making the public believe he was not just another old bumbling politician, but one who showed some promise in getting the country moving, and reinvigorating the lumbering economy. However when Wilson was appointed prime minister these issues got pushed back from the centre stage; dumped off into the newly created Department of Economic Affairs. The majority of research and development funds were being channelled into a few large scale projects which had no real impact on the economy, leaving the new department short on options and in conflict with the treasury over the power to control economic affairs. However the external image the government was giving out was promising, the signing of the National Plan by the government and the trade unions showed potential to the nation, an indication that the new leadership was active in its attempt to bring the suffering economy back to its feet. However this act in reality did very little to help, and paired with the discovery that the previous conservative establishment had played off the economic situation better than was the reality, it was clear that the labour party would have to make some big changes to how they were going to operate. In this situation the party really started to become unstuck, changes in the party manifesto were coming thick and fast. Priorities such as house building, and changes in the welfare state were postponed. Alongside an increased taxation rate and…

    • 1722 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ Essay
    • 304 Words
    • 1 Page

    DBQ Essay

    In conclusion, what led to the rise of political parties in the 1970s was different views and…

    • 304 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    How Successful Was the Conservative Party Between 1918 and 1929
    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages

    How Successful Was the Conservative Party Between 1918 and 1929

    As a party the Conservatives can be seen to have achieved considerable success between the years 1918-28. Before the war the party had lost 3 consecutive elections, whereas during the period 1918-28 they were in power for all but 10 months of those 10 years (First Labour Government January- October 1924). It can then be seen through their domination of power that they were very successful. However during the first 4 of those years, whilst in power, they shared it with the Liberal Party, as their chances of winning as an individual party were near non-existent and so this limits the extent of their success. Their failings can also be seen through Stanley Baldwin, whose misjudged decision to hold a general election led the party to disaster in 1924 and lost them their position in government. I will argue that the Conservatives were very successful during those years, and that whilst such success was lessened by these two factors, the period 1918-28 was a largely prosperous time for the party.…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    To What Extent Was The Conservative Government In The Years 1951-1964
    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages

    To What Extent Was The Conservative Government In The Years 1951-1964

    During 1951-1954 Britain saw an improvement in the economy of the country. The global economy was booming as countries rebuilt after the war. High levels of demand from other countries and at home meant that by 1955 the unemployment rate was 1%, the lowest it had been since the end of the war. Wages rose by 30% and this all led to economic growth which was illustrated by the fact that home and car ownership, as well as demand for consumer goods increased dramatically…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Did Labour Lose The 1924 Election
    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Did Labour Lose The 1924 Election

    While the 1924 Labour government was undoubtedly one of the most important developments in party politics, there were other factors that contributed to the change from Liberal vs Conservatives in the 1880 to Labour vs conservative with Liberal's downfall by 1951. The 1924 Labour government was arguably a significant development as it was the first time Labour won an election, proving they had progressed from a small independent party to a real opponent of the Conservatives. This was significant as it showed that Labour had finally gotten their foot in the door and how Conservatives had not fully recovered from their decline in the previous 2 decades. The win was a huge shock to the Conservatives, but they won in a weak position and only lasted 10 months.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain Why Did The Republicans Win The 1906 Election
    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Explain Why Did The Republicans Win The 1906 Election

    In the1870s, the Conservative Party won three out of four elections and formed the government for 17 years out of a total of 20 years. It reflected the Conservative Party was the most powerful party in England at that time; they even had an overpowering majority of seats in the House of Lords. They had support from everywhere. However, the situation changed dramatically when the Liberal party won the general election in 1906 with an overwhelming majority of 400 seats as against 157 seats for the Conservatives party. This event was marked as the well-known ‘Liberal landslide’. There are several reasons why the Conservative lost such a large amount of seats; national efficiency, the imposition of Education Act and Licensing Act, tariff campaign and Neglect of social reform.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain How Successful Were The Labour Welfare Reforms
    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Explain How Successful Were The Labour Welfare Reforms

    The New Labour Government came in to power in a ‘Landslide’ election victory. The Government was led by Clement Atlee and introduced reforms. The reforms were in Social Security, Health, Housing, Education and Employment.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Has Welfare Reform in the Uk Since 1997, Been Determined More by Ideology or Pragmatism?
    • 3395 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Has Welfare Reform in the Uk Since 1997, Been Determined More by Ideology or Pragmatism?

    Fielding, S. (2003). The Labour Party: continuity and change in the making of ‘New’ Labour. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.…

    • 3395 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Was Attlee a truly revolutionary MP?
    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Was Attlee a truly revolutionary MP?

    Perhaps, the most ‘revolutionary’ reform that Labour introduced was the NHS. Although there was liberal influence and consensus between the parties over welfare, the clear historical fact remains that Atlee’s Labour party introduced this. The public were in dire need of better healthcare – especially those who couldn’t afford it. Unfortunately, the majority of the population after the war were still living on a very small income and not many people in society could afford health services.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Labour weakness was the reason for conservative dominance
    • 562 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Labour weakness was the reason for conservative dominance

    Labour weakness was the most important reason for Conservative dominance from 1951 to 1964. How far do you agree? Between 1951 and 1964, the Conservative's time in power, the Labour party were providing ineffectual opposition. One of the reasons for this was their internal disputes over issues such as unilateralism. However, there were also more important reasons for Conservative dominance, such as the economy and growing prosperity in Britain, the property owning democracy and the greater availability of credit, modern conveiniences and luxury items. Prosperity during this time was growing, and people were in general wealthier than they had been before. A reason for this could have been the manipulation of the economy by the Conservatives; their stop-and-go stagflation lowered and rose taxes in accordance to the election date in order to gain more votes. Though they had no real long-term economic plan and their wily manipulation was often criticised, it did help them to gain votes. The wages also rose during this time meaning people were able to more freely afford luxury items and other things such as mortgages, which links to the property owning democracy.…

    • 562 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Labour Reforms 1945-1951
    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Labour Reforms 1945-1951

    When the war ended in 1945, the Labour Government, led by Clement Atlee, were faced with tackling numerous problems that existed in Britain. Their aim was to meet the welfare needs of the British people who, during the war, got used to support provided by the government. In 1942, a Civil Servant and an experienced worker on social welfare named William Beveridge constructed a report which would go on to become the basis for the Labour reforms. By 1951, Labour had introduced many different reforms aiming to tackle the problems that faced Britain. The Beveridge Report identified what is known as the 5 giants; these include disease, want, squalor, idleness and ignorance. Arguably the most important and successful were the acts introduced to tackle disease and want, but some may disagree. Nevertheless, it is clear that the Labour government met most of the needs of the British people between 1945-1951.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Social class is still the determinant of voting behaviour
    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Social class is still the determinant of voting behaviour

    The most apparent change in the class de-alignment was in the 1997 general election. Tony Blair brought in the ‘new labour’, intended to be a ‘catch all’ party which aimed to please everyone, regardless of ethnicity, gender, region and class. Tony Blair strived to unite the country and in his victory speech he said he aimed to achieve ‘a Britain that is one nation, with shared values and purpose’. This made his party extremely popular and Tony Blair won the…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics