Preview

Aaron Harker

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
338 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Aaron Harker
The Founders provided for change to the Constitution with Article 5
Constitutional amendments may be proposed and ratified, or approved, in two ways:
A two-thirds vote in the house and senate
Two-thirds of the states petition, or appeal to, Congress to call a convention.

In the 1980s and early 1990s, 32 state legislature petitioned Congress for a convention to propose a balanced budget amendment.
Congress has to methods for obtaining state approval when an amendment is proposed:
The legislature in three-fourths of the states can ratify an amendment.
The states hold special conventions and need three-fourths of the conventions to approve it
Congress set a rule that says there is a time limit-seven years- for states to ratify an amendment.

There are two indirect ways to adapt the Constitution for changing times
Changes through law
For example, Article I gives Congress the power to “lay and collect taxes” but does not spell out the practical details.
Passing tax laws is one way Congress has expanded the scope of its power.
Changes through practices
For example, Article II says the Congress may impeach, or accuse, federal officials and remove them from office, but is vague on the types of crimes.
Interpreting Article II is one way Congress can adapt the Constitution.

The Actions of presidents have affected the interpretation of the Constitution.
Modern presidents often conduct foreign affairs by executive agreement—agreements between heads of states—instead of the treaty process specified in the Constitution.

Through judicial review, the Supreme Court plays a key role in interpreting the meaning of words and phrases in the Constitution.
Those who support judicial restraint believe that the Court should avoid taking initiative on social and political issues.
Those who support judicial activism believe that the Court should actively help settle difficult social and political questions.

The Constitution can be changed informally through

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    11.4 questions

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. What are the two ways Congress may be involved in amending the Constitution? Which method has never been used?…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many section of the Constitution have been debated and examined. One of the most interesting articles is Article V which details the process of ‘amending,’ or revising, the Constitution. There are two ways to go about the amending process. According to usconstitution.net, “the first method is for a bill to pass both houses of the legislature, by a two-thirds majority in each. Once the bill has passed both houses, it goes on to the states. This is the route taken by all current amendments. Because of some long outstanding amendments, such as the 27th, Congress will normally put a time limit (typically seven years) for the bill to be approved as an amendment.” Secondly, "Congress ... on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which ... shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States (Philip 26)." This procedure has never been used to amend the Constitution.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judicial Activism is when the Supreme Court is willing to change the public policy that has been put into place. Judges who practice judicial activism are considered policy makers. Many of the laws that are passed often depend on what the society needs as a whole. As Pacelle stated in his book, “It is important to note that though many people equate judicial activism with…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The United states constitution is meant to serve as guide lane for all states for all states where the document is meant only to provide a basic structure to the government, and all decisions on meaning are to be interpreted by the Judiciary branch. As said by "J. Harvie Wilkinson III" "Americans…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ch 2 Government Politics

    • 754 Words
    • 5 Pages

    International agreements between the president and other nations that do not require the approval of the Senate are known as…

    • 754 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mr Alex Rusby

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The amendments can be proposed by a two-thirds majority of both houses of Congress, once this is passed it is then ratified by the legislatures in three-quarters of the States. The constitution can also be amended by a national convention called by Congress at the request of the State Legislatures, which can then be ratified by conventions in three-quarters of the States. These processes are interchangeable; the houses of Congress can propose an amendment and it can be ratified by the States, or vice-versa. No amendments have ever been passed through the use of conventions, as gaining a two-thirds majority of State legislatures is too substantial. The US constitution has been criticised for being too rigid making it difficult to amend and as the parties within government become more homogenous and party voting increases, the process of amendments gets even tougher.…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first draft of this new Constitution lacked the placement of specific limits on government power which is why this bill was created. The U.S. House of Representatives approved 17 amendments from which the Senate approved 12. Those 12 were sent to each if the…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Presidential powers are laid out in article II of the constitution, these include a range of formal power such as the power to propose legislation, submit the annual budget, sign legislation, veto legislation, act as chief executive, nominate federal judges and several others. There are also a range of informal powers that have progressively increased in power such as the ability for Presidents to issue executive orders. Although the founding fathers intended to create a government that had a system of checks and balances to prevent tyranny, the effectiveness of these checks in place may not have been as authoritative as intended as the President has ways of getting around the checks in place.…

    • 963 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    28th Amendment

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages

    must call such a convention for the purpose of considering amendments. To date, only the first method…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Texas constitution.

    • 547 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The framers of the Texas Constitution failed to anticipate that the limitations they imposed on governmental institutions would ultimately allow major economic interests within the state to dominate the policy-making process, often to the detriment of the lower socioeconomic groups. What the delegates to the Texas Constitutional Convention of 1875 regarded as the strengths of the constitution--fragmented authority, detailed limitations on the power of governmental institutions, and decentralization--have served to limit the ability of state and local governments to adapt effectively to economic and demographic changes. The perceived solutions to many of the problems of 1875 have compounded the problems of state and local governments in the 2000s.…

    • 547 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Consitutional Review

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When people cannot get decisive action from their political leaders they are likely to turn to courts and judges instead. That is when any political group cannot gain electoral support…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Constitution of the United States explicates the enumerated powers that the people have granted to their public administration. A narrow interpretation of the Constitution would mean denying the government the powers granted to them to keep order, equality, and fairness. An expanded interpretation would "extend words beyond their natural and obvious import, and we might question the application of the term…" (244). It is the government's responsibility to exercise powers that cannot be exercised by its governed people. There are no guidelines in the Constitution's composition that discloses how to interpret the language; therefore, it is in the hands of three federal branches of government to decipher the Constitutions meaning.…

    • 2361 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Executive Branch

    • 938 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cited: Trent E. Lorcher, “Explanation of the United States Constitution: Article II, The Executive Branch” Bright Hub Education, Updated on March 9th, 2014.…

    • 938 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I do believe that judicial activism can be dangerous if the decision is made by a judge based on a belief that can be harmful to a group, such as being prejudice to a specific race, gender, or age, just to be spiteful. I would like to think that wouldn’t happen today and that we have learned from history not to repeat that kind of behavior, yet I still see it today. A good example is the fight for gay marriage and rights for equal treatment for transgenders.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is one of the few amendments that is not directly applied to the state government. This is an amendment is only applicable to the federal government.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays