Preview

Abigail Fisher vs University of Texas

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
469 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Abigail Fisher vs University of Texas
Royal Dorrough
Business Law 1
Nov. 29, 2012 Abigail Fisher vs University of Texas

Have you ever once being denied of school admission cause of discriminated toward you? If you have, you made have been violated of your right. This is based on Equal Protection Clause that forbids state from passing laws depriving any person of life, liberty, or property without due process. The big factor of admission decision serves as a compelling interest in achieving diversity among its student body.

Abigail Fisher filed law suit against the University of Texas in 2008 after the school denied her admission because of the color of her skin. Fisher filed suit against the university and other related defendant claiming that the University of Texas use of race as a consideration in admission decision was in violated of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Title VI. The courts decide in favor of the University of Texas and the United State court of appeal for the fifth circuit affirmed the district court decision. Fisher appeals the appellate court decision. In these cases, affirmative action will argue that such program are based on reverse-racism. In American society, racism is still a potent force. It made not be violent like it was 50 year ago, but it stills an issue today. In the case of Fisher versus the University of Texas on the ground that their affirmative action based admissions process is unconstitutional. The current admission policy automatically admits the top ten percent from each Texas High School. Base on affirmative action, they operate on the basis of race it has to make this assumption. To compare Abigail case to other case that are similar to her is that Bakke, Grutter, and Gratz all had the same situation of applying for a school. All of them was denied admission because the use of race as a factor in making admission decision. These cases were affected by the Equal Protection Clause of Title VI. Some of these cases were

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the present case, the question is whether Joe Smith parent can file a lawsuit because he was discriminated against due to his race, sex, national origin, religion, and/or financial means. Like in the Yick Wo case, Smith is discriminated due to his national origin. Even though, his origin is white and the admissions policy might appear neutral to some, but it is applied unequally to whites. In DeFunis v Odegaard, this case was ruled moot because Defunis was in his last year of law school, so the courts would have to wait for a later case to set a precedent. In Bakke v. UC Board of Regents, the court would decide that at place of higher education can use race in their admission policy, but it cannot be the lone deciding factor. When the university…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abagail Fisher, a white female, applied for admission into the University of Texas. She was denied entrance because she did not qualify for Texas' Top 10 Percent Plan. This plan guarantees entrance to the top ten percent of every graduating high school class in Texas. Miss Fisher sued the University of Texas because she claimed that the use of race in admissions to the college violated the Equal Protection Clause from the 14th Amendment. The case made it all the way up to the Supreme Court which came to a final verdict. The University of Texas could use race as a plus factor when considering admissions. This use of race as a plus factor promotes diversity and therefore satisfies strict scrutiny.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1978 Supreme Court case, Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 35 year old while male, Allan Bakke applied to the University of California Davis Medical School and was rejected twice while exceeding academic requirements for admission. The university reserved 16 of 100 spots for minorities in part of their affirmative action program. Bakke sued claiming he was denied admission to the Medical school both times based on race. The California Medical School argued that their admissions process is used to guarantee all individuals an equal opportunity while creating a diverse student body. Baker argued that this admissions process violated the Equal Protection Act and the Civil Rights Act. Did the University of California violate…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The effect of this case was that racial quotas were ruled to be unconstitutional, while affirmative action programs would remain constitutional. These affirmative action programs would rule as constitutional as long as race is one of many admission factors, it is used to remedy past findings of discrimination, or to promote the school’s diversity levels. This also allowed more diversity to be added to universities and this topic would be brought up once again in Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) where Bakke’s case requirements allowed the University of Michigan’s affirmative action program to pass through by having the interest of a diverse student body and giving significant but not determinative weight to its applicants’ race. ("The Supreme Court. Expanding Civil Rights. Landmark Cases. Regents of California v. Bakke…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2. Equal protection clause – prohibits “invidious” discrimination, that is, discrimination not based on sufficient justification.…

    • 1870 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Problem: Jennifer Gratz was denied the admission to University of Michigan’s College of literature, due to her race. The Supreme Court concluded that the denial was unconstitutional based on the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and Title VI Civil Rights Act because it wasn’t narrowly tailored. They set the precedent that colleges can’t subtract points from admission due to race, because it violates the Equal Protection Clause. Decided that same year another girl named Barbara Grutter was denied the admission to University of Michigan Law School, due to her race as well. The Supreme Court decided that the University didn’t violate the Equal Protection Clause because the clause doesn’t forbid the Law school’s use of race as a factor in admissions in order to have a more diverse student…

    • 4656 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On June 23rd 2016, the judges of the supreme court gathered to analyze a challenge about the University of Texas of Austin’s race-conscious admissions program. This case, known as Fisher II v. The University of Texas, was brought about when senior Abigail Fisher applied to the University of Texas and did not get in. She was not accepted in the top ten percent program as well( a program in Texas Law stating that top ten percent students from all schools in Texas get automatic admission into UT Austin), and firmly believed that she had the academic status to get in. She implied that the fact that she was white and had a good financial status reduced her chances of admission into the university and that she was heavily racially discriminated.…

    • 2122 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A considerable number of children who were the plaintiffs of African American descent were deprived of access to public schools based on their race. The litigants mainly wanted to contest the segregation doctrine applied to them in southern states and allow them to choose any school of their choice without being discriminated against racial lines.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A. Rule: In the field of public education, the doctrine of “separate but equal” has no place. Separate education facilities are inherently unequal. Therefore we hold that the plaintiffs and others similarly situated for whom actions have been brought are, by reason of the segregation…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Grutter v. Bollinger, the Court accepted that the “critical mass” concept was not an “outright racial balancing”, where race was used as a factor in the admission process (Alexander 151). Therefore, the Court held that diversity is a compelling interest for the University of Michigan Law School as long as race is not the only factor considered for admission. In addition, the Court concluded that the “benefits of diversity are substantial” and “promotes cross racial understanding, helps to break down racial stereotypes, and enables students to better understand persons of difference races” (Chemenrisky 772). Moreover, “the Court accepted the university’s argument that the education of all students is enhanced with a diverse student body”…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Its Equal Protection Clause requires each state to provide equal protection under the law to all people within its jurisdiction. This clause later became the basis for Brown v. Board of Education (1954), the Supreme Court decision which precipitated the dismantling of racial segregation in the United States.”…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People now check on colleges’ admissions programs to see how big of a factor is race. Fisher v Texas was a very similar case to Grutter v Bollinger, as racial discrimination is starting to become an even greater trend in America’s…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ncfe E&D Unit 1

    • 2827 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Schools, Colleges and Universities all have equal opportunity policies to ensure no discrimination against a person for such things as:…

    • 2827 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Considering diversity within the campus is an important factor for college boards across the country, the admission offices are prone to deny applicants of common, white ethnicity if an applicant of the same, or lessened, qualifications, but who obtains a more diverse ethnicity. Although this practice may seem to be in favor with what the Brown v. Board of Education desired to accomplish, it is reasonable to question if the importance of diversity over the best applicants has taken things far beyond the extent of equal opportunity to education. More specifically, the University of California at Davis (a medical program) has a regular admission program and a special admission program. Most students fall under the regular admission program and have to meet certain requirements such as above a 2.5 GPA. However, the special admission program accepts the applicants of the minority group and have been found to be disadvantaged through the education system in the past. Where the unfairness comes up is that the “Special candidates… did not have to meet the 2.5 grade point cutoff and were not ranked against candidates in the general admissions process” (Regents of University). With the standards of the minority applicants straying from the standards of the majority applicants, the inequitability of the college admission process has…

    • 1610 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Schools have a duty to eliminate unlawful racial discrimination and to promote equality of opportunity and good relations between people of different groups[2].…

    • 2916 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays