To be able to understand how organic soluble compounds could be isolated from non-organic components, a chromatographic separation process was used. The objective of the analgesic drug identification is to isolate the organic compounds/ active ingredients in an unknown drug. The identity of the drug was determined through melting point, percent recover, and Rf values. The comparable data for acetaminophen from the manufacturer is 500mg of active ingredient. After conducting the experiment-extraction, distillation, and evaporation- 451mg of active ingredient. This relates to a 68.1% recovery. The melting point was between 158 and 165 degrees Celsius, which is almost ten degrees lower than the published melting point of acetaminophen. After conducting a TLC plate, the Rf value was calculated to be .4268, the same as the standard Rf.…
I personally agree that Singleton should have received the death penalty. Schizophrenia can develop in later life, and Singleton committed his heinous crime at a young age. He murdered an innocent civilian, taking away that person’s hopes, dreams, and future, and causing incomparable grief to family and friends. Since his symptoms were being controlled by his medication, I believe the prison should have continued to mandate his medication until his execution date, and continued on with the procedure. Singleton was eventually executed by means of lethal injection at Cummins Unit Prison on Tuesday, January 6th, 2004, after spending twenty three years on death row.…
The death penalty, no matter your opinion on the practice of it, is a reality in thirty-one of the fifty states within America. With that being said, a group of people is exempt from being placed on death row due to the Atkins v. Virginia case; the mentally disabled. Bobby James Moore was convicted of capital murder in 1980. He shot a seventy-year-old store clerk in Houston, Texas and his sentence, affirmed on appeal, was execution. In 2001, after a court granted habeas, Moore argue that the Atkins v. Virginia case should apply to him.…
The intention of Canada’s Sentencing law of abolishing the death penalty to life imprisonment was to create the fixture of humanity. In this paper, I want to examine that the death penalty should not be reinstituted within the Canadian society. Canadian legislators are trying to treasure an appropriate balance between individual wishes being satisfied and the states obligation to secure the prosperity of society. The policy of this state of removing the death penalty should be attempted to be removed everywhere. The overview of this paper will be based upon an Auto-Ethnography method of research. I will examine the role of representing the process of how the death penalty was abolished and why it should be that way in a qualitative research,…
Severely mentally ill individuals may commit horrific crimes. Many believe that these crimes deserve the death penalty; however, others believe that in certain circumstances the mentally ill should be exempt from capital punishment and believe that the punishment is too extreme for those who are not fully aware of committing their crimes. Many mentally ill individuals have been executed and some are currently on death row. All the while, this controversial issue is still being debated on.…
Despite the evidence found that gun control in fact could decline crime, some individuals refuse to believe so. One of those individuals is, Kit Daniels, a Texas journalist. Daniels in his article “10 reasons why gun control will not work” argues that putting a restriction on gun laws will not stop mass killings or gun related deaths nationwide, because individuals who are set out kill will find a way around these restrictions. Daniels then proceeds to argue that a limit on obtaining guns is a violation to the second amendment (Daniels). The argument that Daniels argues which is that gun control will not abolish mass shootings is accurate to an extend. As Daniels argues individuals who want are set out to kill others will proceed to do so.…
Death penalty is the punish meant of execution, administered to someone legally convicted of a capital crime and there are twenty-two countries in the world that still impose the death penalty for capital crimes, the United states is one of them. If you are charged with capital homicide, and the jury of twelve of your peers proclaims, “We find the defendant guilty as charged”(Condenaststore). Then it is simple, you are going to forfeit your life, so abolishing the death penalty or there’s no coming back from the grave.…
There is a pattern of evidence indicating racial disparities in the charging, sentencing, and imposition of the death penalty according to a 1990 U.S. Government report. Racism is not the only problem with Capital Punishment. Many inmates on death row suffer from mental retardation. In fact the 1984 ECOSOC safeguards state that death penalty must not be carried out on persons who have become insane, while the ECOSOC resolution 1989/64 on the executation of the 1984 safeguards recommends that UN members states eliminate the death penalty for persons suffering from mental illness or extremely limited competence. Amnesty International has documented the cases of more than 50 prisoners suffering from mental illness who have been executed in the U.S. in the past decade. Humanitarian standards maintain that mentally impaired people should not be held criminally responsible for their acts. The prohibition against executing insane recognizes that killing people who cannot comprehend the nature and purpose of their punishment is not a deterrent or retribution. Despite all this the mentally ill are still being executed. Innocent people will be killed if the death penalty is kept in the same way that it is used today. Three hundred fifty people convicted of capital crimes in the U.S. between 1990 and 1985were innocent of the crime charged, according to a 1987 study. Some prisoners escaped execution by minutes, but 23 were not so lucky…
There’s a saying that two wrongs don’t make a right. According to the DPIC (Death Penalty…
There are many differences in the way people view the death penalty. Some are against it and some agree with it. There have been many studies trying to prove or disprove a point regarding the death penalty. Some have regarded the death penalty as a hindrance, and some have regarded it as state sanctioned murder and not civilized. The death penalty has been linked to societies for hundreds of years. More recently, as we become more civilized, the death penalty has been questioned on if it is the correct way to so enforce justice on the people. The death penalty is a highly controversial subject. No one knows who’s right or who’s wrong-it’s fifty percent speculation and fifty percent research. It’s just a lot of thoughts and beliefs from people who have contributed to the death penalty controversy. Who’s right and who’s wrong? That is the question.…
The first reason that people with a mental illness should not be executed is because it does not reduce violence or illness (Sheffer). There are no benefits from executing people. One may think that it does, but if the crime was committed by someone who was mentally unstable like a bipolar person, it could have been a random act of violence that they would have not done otherwise if not mentally ill. People may think that it will bring a sigh of relief knowing that the person who committed the crime is not out on the streets of alive in anyway so they are not given the chance to do the crime. But there is a difference between a sane person committing a crime and a mentally ill person committing a crime. The difference is that a sane person knows that what they are doing is wrong but a mentally ill person does not. Everyone makes mistakes in life some bigger than others. Yes, they should be punished, or at least helped to make sure they do not do it again. But killing them is like doing the crime two times. It also never brings the person they killed back (Sheffer). The death of the person responsible for the…
The death penalty has always been a controversial topic in the United States. It is outlawed in 16 states, but it should be abolished in all fifty states. The act of the death penalty is irrational, costly, inhumane, and religiously immoral. Taking an individual’s life, because he/she murdered someone is senseless and is not a good representation of the United States.…
According to Forbes, the top ten most dangerous cities in the United States as of 2014,…
I think people who commit horrible crimes should receive the death penalty. For example corruption, adultery, and drug smuggling. Mostly murderers are relatively young. Then protect us from further terrorist attacks and other dangers. They government is only trying to keep us safe.…
Although 60 percent of Americans say they still support the death penalty according to the Gallup Poll, it has dropped from 80 percent in 1994. Six states have also done away with the death penalty and in other states, governors have put a temporary ban on capital punishment. The article points out that 700 people, have been put to death in California before 1976, however the state has 741 currently on death row and has only executed 13 people since 1976. The death penalty has even caught President Obama’s attention and has requested a review of capital punishment in 2014, due to the botched execution of Clayton Lockett. When Lockett was given the needle, he was supposed to be sedated and then his breathing would eventually stop. The medication did not work and instead the prisoner felt that his entire body was burning until a vein ruptured and he died of a massive heart attack. Lockett suffered a horrible death for 40 minutes, before it was over and made many question if it was worth it.…